Cargando…

Reproducibility and validity of anterior implant esthetic indices: A review

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review was to narrate about the reproducibility and validity of different indices evaluating esthetic aspects in anterior single implant-supported restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search of Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Scienc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Srivastava, Gunjan, Panda, Swagatika, Panda, Saurav, Padhiary, Subrat Kumar, Das, Sitansu Sekhar, Fabbro, Massimo Del
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32831501
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_528_19
_version_ 1783569710491631616
author Srivastava, Gunjan
Panda, Swagatika
Panda, Saurav
Padhiary, Subrat Kumar
Das, Sitansu Sekhar
Fabbro, Massimo Del
author_facet Srivastava, Gunjan
Panda, Swagatika
Panda, Saurav
Padhiary, Subrat Kumar
Das, Sitansu Sekhar
Fabbro, Massimo Del
author_sort Srivastava, Gunjan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review was to narrate about the reproducibility and validity of different indices evaluating esthetic aspects in anterior single implant-supported restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search of Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science databases was performed using the keywords “dental implants,” “anterior esthetics,” “esthetic score,” and “esthetic index.” Besides, a manual search of dental implant journals was carried out. RESULTS: The electronic search revealed 932 titles. After further review, 14 articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Because of the heterogeneity of the study designs, interventions, and parameters used for assessment of esthetics, no meta-analysis could be performed. CONCLUSION: Many indices have been proposed for the evaluation of the esthetic aspects of single implant-supported reconstructions in the anterior maxilla. All of them have some advantages and drawbacks that this review pointed out. The evidence level of studies used for the validation of these indices is poor. It is necessary to achieve a consensus on the tools for assessment of the esthetic aspect and perform evidence-based studies to validate an appropriate index.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7418544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74185442020-08-20 Reproducibility and validity of anterior implant esthetic indices: A review Srivastava, Gunjan Panda, Swagatika Panda, Saurav Padhiary, Subrat Kumar Das, Sitansu Sekhar Fabbro, Massimo Del J Indian Soc Periodontol Review Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this review was to narrate about the reproducibility and validity of different indices evaluating esthetic aspects in anterior single implant-supported restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic search of Medline, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science databases was performed using the keywords “dental implants,” “anterior esthetics,” “esthetic score,” and “esthetic index.” Besides, a manual search of dental implant journals was carried out. RESULTS: The electronic search revealed 932 titles. After further review, 14 articles fulfilled the eligibility criteria and were included in this review. Because of the heterogeneity of the study designs, interventions, and parameters used for assessment of esthetics, no meta-analysis could be performed. CONCLUSION: Many indices have been proposed for the evaluation of the esthetic aspects of single implant-supported reconstructions in the anterior maxilla. All of them have some advantages and drawbacks that this review pointed out. The evidence level of studies used for the validation of these indices is poor. It is necessary to achieve a consensus on the tools for assessment of the esthetic aspect and perform evidence-based studies to validate an appropriate index. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020 2020-06-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7418544/ /pubmed/32831501 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_528_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Indian Society of Periodontology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Review Article
Srivastava, Gunjan
Panda, Swagatika
Panda, Saurav
Padhiary, Subrat Kumar
Das, Sitansu Sekhar
Fabbro, Massimo Del
Reproducibility and validity of anterior implant esthetic indices: A review
title Reproducibility and validity of anterior implant esthetic indices: A review
title_full Reproducibility and validity of anterior implant esthetic indices: A review
title_fullStr Reproducibility and validity of anterior implant esthetic indices: A review
title_full_unstemmed Reproducibility and validity of anterior implant esthetic indices: A review
title_short Reproducibility and validity of anterior implant esthetic indices: A review
title_sort reproducibility and validity of anterior implant esthetic indices: a review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32831501
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jisp.jisp_528_19
work_keys_str_mv AT srivastavagunjan reproducibilityandvalidityofanteriorimplantestheticindicesareview
AT pandaswagatika reproducibilityandvalidityofanteriorimplantestheticindicesareview
AT pandasaurav reproducibilityandvalidityofanteriorimplantestheticindicesareview
AT padhiarysubratkumar reproducibilityandvalidityofanteriorimplantestheticindicesareview
AT dassitansusekhar reproducibilityandvalidityofanteriorimplantestheticindicesareview
AT fabbromassimodel reproducibilityandvalidityofanteriorimplantestheticindicesareview