Cargando…
Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis
OBJECTIVE: First-phase ejection fraction (EF1) is a novel measure of early left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We investigated determinants of EF1 and its prognostic value in aortic stenosis. METHODS: EF1 was measured retrospectively in participants of an echocardiography/cardiovascular magnetic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32345658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316684 |
_version_ | 1783569721233244160 |
---|---|
author | Bing, Rong Gu, Haotian Chin, Calvin Fang, Lingyun White, Audrey Everett, Russell J Spath, Nicholas B Park, Eunsoo Jenkins, William SA Shah, Anoop SV Mills, Nicholas L Flapan, Andrew D Chambers, John B Newby, David E Chowienczyk, Phil Dweck, Marc R |
author_facet | Bing, Rong Gu, Haotian Chin, Calvin Fang, Lingyun White, Audrey Everett, Russell J Spath, Nicholas B Park, Eunsoo Jenkins, William SA Shah, Anoop SV Mills, Nicholas L Flapan, Andrew D Chambers, John B Newby, David E Chowienczyk, Phil Dweck, Marc R |
author_sort | Bing, Rong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: First-phase ejection fraction (EF1) is a novel measure of early left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We investigated determinants of EF1 and its prognostic value in aortic stenosis. METHODS: EF1 was measured retrospectively in participants of an echocardiography/cardiovascular magnetic resonance cohort study which recruited patients with aortic stenosis (peak aortic velocity of ≥2 m/s) between 2012 and 2014. Linear regression models were constructed to examine variables associated with EF1. Cox proportional hazards were used to determine the prognostic power of EF1 for aortic valve replacement (AVR, performed as part of clinical care in accordance with international guidelines) or death. RESULTS: Total follow-up of the 149 participants (69.8% male, 70 (65–76) years, mean gradient 33 (21–42) mm Hg) was 238 029 person-days. Sixty-seven participants (45%) had a low baseline EF1 (<25%) despite normal ejection fraction (67% (62%–71%)). Patients with low EF1 had more severe aortic stenosis (mean gradient 39 (34–45) mm Hg vs 24 (16–35) mm Hg, p<0.001) and more myocardial fibrosis (indexed extracellular volume (iECV) (24.2 (19.6–28.7) mL/m(2) vs 20.6 (16.8–24.3) mL/m(2), p=0.002; late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) prevalence 52% vs 20%, p<0.001). Zva, iECV and infarct LGE were independent predictors of EF1. EF1 improved post-AVR (n=57 with post-AVR EF1 available, baseline 16 (12–24) vs follow-up 27% (22%–31%); p<0.001). Low baseline EF1 was an independent predictor of AVR/death (HR 5.6, 95% CI 3.4 to 9.4), driven by AVR. CONCLUSION: EF1 quantifies early, potentially reversible systolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis, is associated with global afterload and myocardial fibrosis, and is an independent predictor of AVR. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7418600 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74186002020-08-18 Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis Bing, Rong Gu, Haotian Chin, Calvin Fang, Lingyun White, Audrey Everett, Russell J Spath, Nicholas B Park, Eunsoo Jenkins, William SA Shah, Anoop SV Mills, Nicholas L Flapan, Andrew D Chambers, John B Newby, David E Chowienczyk, Phil Dweck, Marc R Heart Valvular Heart Disease OBJECTIVE: First-phase ejection fraction (EF1) is a novel measure of early left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We investigated determinants of EF1 and its prognostic value in aortic stenosis. METHODS: EF1 was measured retrospectively in participants of an echocardiography/cardiovascular magnetic resonance cohort study which recruited patients with aortic stenosis (peak aortic velocity of ≥2 m/s) between 2012 and 2014. Linear regression models were constructed to examine variables associated with EF1. Cox proportional hazards were used to determine the prognostic power of EF1 for aortic valve replacement (AVR, performed as part of clinical care in accordance with international guidelines) or death. RESULTS: Total follow-up of the 149 participants (69.8% male, 70 (65–76) years, mean gradient 33 (21–42) mm Hg) was 238 029 person-days. Sixty-seven participants (45%) had a low baseline EF1 (<25%) despite normal ejection fraction (67% (62%–71%)). Patients with low EF1 had more severe aortic stenosis (mean gradient 39 (34–45) mm Hg vs 24 (16–35) mm Hg, p<0.001) and more myocardial fibrosis (indexed extracellular volume (iECV) (24.2 (19.6–28.7) mL/m(2) vs 20.6 (16.8–24.3) mL/m(2), p=0.002; late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) prevalence 52% vs 20%, p<0.001). Zva, iECV and infarct LGE were independent predictors of EF1. EF1 improved post-AVR (n=57 with post-AVR EF1 available, baseline 16 (12–24) vs follow-up 27% (22%–31%); p<0.001). Low baseline EF1 was an independent predictor of AVR/death (HR 5.6, 95% CI 3.4 to 9.4), driven by AVR. CONCLUSION: EF1 quantifies early, potentially reversible systolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis, is associated with global afterload and myocardial fibrosis, and is an independent predictor of AVR. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7418600/ /pubmed/32345658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316684 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Valvular Heart Disease Bing, Rong Gu, Haotian Chin, Calvin Fang, Lingyun White, Audrey Everett, Russell J Spath, Nicholas B Park, Eunsoo Jenkins, William SA Shah, Anoop SV Mills, Nicholas L Flapan, Andrew D Chambers, John B Newby, David E Chowienczyk, Phil Dweck, Marc R Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis |
title | Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis |
title_full | Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis |
title_fullStr | Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis |
title_short | Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis |
title_sort | determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis |
topic | Valvular Heart Disease |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418600/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32345658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316684 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bingrong determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT guhaotian determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT chincalvin determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT fanglingyun determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT whiteaudrey determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT everettrussellj determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT spathnicholasb determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT parkeunsoo determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT jenkinswilliamsa determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT shahanoopsv determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT millsnicholasl determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT flapanandrewd determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT chambersjohnb determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT newbydavide determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT chowienczykphil determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis AT dweckmarcr determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis |