Cargando…

Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis

OBJECTIVE: First-phase ejection fraction (EF1) is a novel measure of early left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We investigated determinants of EF1 and its prognostic value in aortic stenosis. METHODS: EF1 was measured retrospectively in participants of an echocardiography/cardiovascular magnetic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bing, Rong, Gu, Haotian, Chin, Calvin, Fang, Lingyun, White, Audrey, Everett, Russell J, Spath, Nicholas B, Park, Eunsoo, Jenkins, William SA, Shah, Anoop SV, Mills, Nicholas L, Flapan, Andrew D, Chambers, John B, Newby, David E, Chowienczyk, Phil, Dweck, Marc R
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32345658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316684
_version_ 1783569721233244160
author Bing, Rong
Gu, Haotian
Chin, Calvin
Fang, Lingyun
White, Audrey
Everett, Russell J
Spath, Nicholas B
Park, Eunsoo
Jenkins, William SA
Shah, Anoop SV
Mills, Nicholas L
Flapan, Andrew D
Chambers, John B
Newby, David E
Chowienczyk, Phil
Dweck, Marc R
author_facet Bing, Rong
Gu, Haotian
Chin, Calvin
Fang, Lingyun
White, Audrey
Everett, Russell J
Spath, Nicholas B
Park, Eunsoo
Jenkins, William SA
Shah, Anoop SV
Mills, Nicholas L
Flapan, Andrew D
Chambers, John B
Newby, David E
Chowienczyk, Phil
Dweck, Marc R
author_sort Bing, Rong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: First-phase ejection fraction (EF1) is a novel measure of early left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We investigated determinants of EF1 and its prognostic value in aortic stenosis. METHODS: EF1 was measured retrospectively in participants of an echocardiography/cardiovascular magnetic resonance cohort study which recruited patients with aortic stenosis (peak aortic velocity of ≥2 m/s) between 2012 and 2014. Linear regression models were constructed to examine variables associated with EF1. Cox proportional hazards were used to determine the prognostic power of EF1 for aortic valve replacement (AVR, performed as part of clinical care in accordance with international guidelines) or death. RESULTS: Total follow-up of the 149 participants (69.8% male, 70 (65–76) years, mean gradient 33 (21–42) mm Hg) was 238 029 person-days. Sixty-seven participants (45%) had a low baseline EF1 (<25%) despite normal ejection fraction (67% (62%–71%)). Patients with low EF1 had more severe aortic stenosis (mean gradient 39 (34–45) mm Hg vs 24 (16–35) mm Hg, p<0.001) and more myocardial fibrosis (indexed extracellular volume (iECV) (24.2 (19.6–28.7) mL/m(2) vs 20.6 (16.8–24.3) mL/m(2), p=0.002; late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) prevalence 52% vs 20%, p<0.001). Zva, iECV and infarct LGE were independent predictors of EF1. EF1 improved post-AVR (n=57 with post-AVR EF1 available, baseline 16 (12–24) vs follow-up 27% (22%–31%); p<0.001). Low baseline EF1 was an independent predictor of AVR/death (HR 5.6, 95% CI 3.4 to 9.4), driven by AVR. CONCLUSION: EF1 quantifies early, potentially reversible systolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis, is associated with global afterload and myocardial fibrosis, and is an independent predictor of AVR.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7418600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74186002020-08-18 Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis Bing, Rong Gu, Haotian Chin, Calvin Fang, Lingyun White, Audrey Everett, Russell J Spath, Nicholas B Park, Eunsoo Jenkins, William SA Shah, Anoop SV Mills, Nicholas L Flapan, Andrew D Chambers, John B Newby, David E Chowienczyk, Phil Dweck, Marc R Heart Valvular Heart Disease OBJECTIVE: First-phase ejection fraction (EF1) is a novel measure of early left ventricular systolic dysfunction. We investigated determinants of EF1 and its prognostic value in aortic stenosis. METHODS: EF1 was measured retrospectively in participants of an echocardiography/cardiovascular magnetic resonance cohort study which recruited patients with aortic stenosis (peak aortic velocity of ≥2 m/s) between 2012 and 2014. Linear regression models were constructed to examine variables associated with EF1. Cox proportional hazards were used to determine the prognostic power of EF1 for aortic valve replacement (AVR, performed as part of clinical care in accordance with international guidelines) or death. RESULTS: Total follow-up of the 149 participants (69.8% male, 70 (65–76) years, mean gradient 33 (21–42) mm Hg) was 238 029 person-days. Sixty-seven participants (45%) had a low baseline EF1 (<25%) despite normal ejection fraction (67% (62%–71%)). Patients with low EF1 had more severe aortic stenosis (mean gradient 39 (34–45) mm Hg vs 24 (16–35) mm Hg, p<0.001) and more myocardial fibrosis (indexed extracellular volume (iECV) (24.2 (19.6–28.7) mL/m(2) vs 20.6 (16.8–24.3) mL/m(2), p=0.002; late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) prevalence 52% vs 20%, p<0.001). Zva, iECV and infarct LGE were independent predictors of EF1. EF1 improved post-AVR (n=57 with post-AVR EF1 available, baseline 16 (12–24) vs follow-up 27% (22%–31%); p<0.001). Low baseline EF1 was an independent predictor of AVR/death (HR 5.6, 95% CI 3.4 to 9.4), driven by AVR. CONCLUSION: EF1 quantifies early, potentially reversible systolic dysfunction in aortic stenosis, is associated with global afterload and myocardial fibrosis, and is an independent predictor of AVR. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08 2020-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7418600/ /pubmed/32345658 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316684 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Valvular Heart Disease
Bing, Rong
Gu, Haotian
Chin, Calvin
Fang, Lingyun
White, Audrey
Everett, Russell J
Spath, Nicholas B
Park, Eunsoo
Jenkins, William SA
Shah, Anoop SV
Mills, Nicholas L
Flapan, Andrew D
Chambers, John B
Newby, David E
Chowienczyk, Phil
Dweck, Marc R
Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis
title Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis
title_full Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis
title_fullStr Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis
title_full_unstemmed Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis
title_short Determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis
title_sort determinants and prognostic value of echocardiographic first-phase ejection fraction in aortic stenosis
topic Valvular Heart Disease
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32345658
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316684
work_keys_str_mv AT bingrong determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT guhaotian determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT chincalvin determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT fanglingyun determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT whiteaudrey determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT everettrussellj determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT spathnicholasb determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT parkeunsoo determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT jenkinswilliamsa determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT shahanoopsv determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT millsnicholasl determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT flapanandrewd determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT chambersjohnb determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT newbydavide determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT chowienczykphil determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis
AT dweckmarcr determinantsandprognosticvalueofechocardiographicfirstphaseejectionfractioninaorticstenosis