Cargando…
TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes
BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed procedure with many options regarding graft choice and graft fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare suspensory and aperture fixation in terms of femoral osseous integration of the bone block after ACL rec...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123662 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00057 |
_version_ | 1783569779776290816 |
---|---|
author | Yari, Shahram Shawn El Naga, Ashraf N. Patel, Amar Qadeer, Ali Asaf Shah, Anup |
author_facet | Yari, Shahram Shawn El Naga, Ashraf N. Patel, Amar Qadeer, Ali Asaf Shah, Anup |
author_sort | Yari, Shahram Shawn |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed procedure with many options regarding graft choice and graft fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare suspensory and aperture fixation in terms of femoral osseous integration of the bone block after ACL reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft. METHODS: After institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained, 37 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft. The patients were randomized according to the graft femoral fixation technique, which was with either a suspensory device (Arthrex TightRope) or aperture fixation by a biocomposite interference screw (Arthrex BioComposite Interference Screw or DePuy Mitek MILAGRO Interference Screw). Tibial fixation, performed with a biocomposite screw and knotless anchor, was identical in all patients. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan at 6 months to evaluate bone block incorporation of the femoral graft within the femoral tunnel, which was the study’s primary outcome. Secondary outcome measures included a postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, range-of-motion measures, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Demographic data were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (89%) completed the study’s 6-month follow-up, at which time the femoral ossification score was significantly greater in the aperture fixation group (p = 0.025). There was no substantial difference between the 2 groups with regard to any other outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: Performing Achilles tendon allograft ACL reconstruction with femoral aperture fixation results in greater femoral bone block incorporation at 6 months postoperatively compared with what is seen after suspensory fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7418916 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74189162020-10-28 TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes Yari, Shahram Shawn El Naga, Ashraf N. Patel, Amar Qadeer, Ali Asaf Shah, Anup JB JS Open Access Scientific Articles BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed procedure with many options regarding graft choice and graft fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare suspensory and aperture fixation in terms of femoral osseous integration of the bone block after ACL reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft. METHODS: After institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained, 37 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft. The patients were randomized according to the graft femoral fixation technique, which was with either a suspensory device (Arthrex TightRope) or aperture fixation by a biocomposite interference screw (Arthrex BioComposite Interference Screw or DePuy Mitek MILAGRO Interference Screw). Tibial fixation, performed with a biocomposite screw and knotless anchor, was identical in all patients. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan at 6 months to evaluate bone block incorporation of the femoral graft within the femoral tunnel, which was the study’s primary outcome. Secondary outcome measures included a postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, range-of-motion measures, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Demographic data were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (89%) completed the study’s 6-month follow-up, at which time the femoral ossification score was significantly greater in the aperture fixation group (p = 0.025). There was no substantial difference between the 2 groups with regard to any other outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: Performing Achilles tendon allograft ACL reconstruction with femoral aperture fixation results in greater femoral bone block incorporation at 6 months postoperatively compared with what is seen after suspensory fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7418916/ /pubmed/33123662 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00057 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Scientific Articles Yari, Shahram Shawn El Naga, Ashraf N. Patel, Amar Qadeer, Ali Asaf Shah, Anup TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes |
title | TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes |
title_full | TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes |
title_fullStr | TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes |
title_full_unstemmed | TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes |
title_short | TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes |
title_sort | tightrope versus biocomposite interference screw for fixation in allograft acl reconstruction: prospective evaluation of osseous integration and patient outcomes |
topic | Scientific Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418916/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123662 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00057 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yarishahramshawn tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstructionprospectiveevaluationofosseousintegrationandpatientoutcomes AT elnagaashrafn tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstructionprospectiveevaluationofosseousintegrationandpatientoutcomes AT patelamar tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstructionprospectiveevaluationofosseousintegrationandpatientoutcomes AT qadeeraliasaf tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstructionprospectiveevaluationofosseousintegrationandpatientoutcomes AT shahanup tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstructionprospectiveevaluationofosseousintegrationandpatientoutcomes |