Cargando…

TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed procedure with many options regarding graft choice and graft fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare suspensory and aperture fixation in terms of femoral osseous integration of the bone block after ACL rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yari, Shahram Shawn, El Naga, Ashraf N., Patel, Amar, Qadeer, Ali Asaf, Shah, Anup
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123662
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00057
_version_ 1783569779776290816
author Yari, Shahram Shawn
El Naga, Ashraf N.
Patel, Amar
Qadeer, Ali Asaf
Shah, Anup
author_facet Yari, Shahram Shawn
El Naga, Ashraf N.
Patel, Amar
Qadeer, Ali Asaf
Shah, Anup
author_sort Yari, Shahram Shawn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed procedure with many options regarding graft choice and graft fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare suspensory and aperture fixation in terms of femoral osseous integration of the bone block after ACL reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft. METHODS: After institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained, 37 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft. The patients were randomized according to the graft femoral fixation technique, which was with either a suspensory device (Arthrex TightRope) or aperture fixation by a biocomposite interference screw (Arthrex BioComposite Interference Screw or DePuy Mitek MILAGRO Interference Screw). Tibial fixation, performed with a biocomposite screw and knotless anchor, was identical in all patients. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan at 6 months to evaluate bone block incorporation of the femoral graft within the femoral tunnel, which was the study’s primary outcome. Secondary outcome measures included a postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, range-of-motion measures, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Demographic data were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (89%) completed the study’s 6-month follow-up, at which time the femoral ossification score was significantly greater in the aperture fixation group (p = 0.025). There was no substantial difference between the 2 groups with regard to any other outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: Performing Achilles tendon allograft ACL reconstruction with femoral aperture fixation results in greater femoral bone block incorporation at 6 months postoperatively compared with what is seen after suspensory fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7418916
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74189162020-10-28 TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes Yari, Shahram Shawn El Naga, Ashraf N. Patel, Amar Qadeer, Ali Asaf Shah, Anup JB JS Open Access Scientific Articles BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is a commonly performed procedure with many options regarding graft choice and graft fixation. The purpose of this study was to compare suspensory and aperture fixation in terms of femoral osseous integration of the bone block after ACL reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft. METHODS: After institutional review board approval and patient consent were obtained, 37 patients underwent ACL reconstruction with an Achilles tendon allograft. The patients were randomized according to the graft femoral fixation technique, which was with either a suspensory device (Arthrex TightRope) or aperture fixation by a biocomposite interference screw (Arthrex BioComposite Interference Screw or DePuy Mitek MILAGRO Interference Screw). Tibial fixation, performed with a biocomposite screw and knotless anchor, was identical in all patients. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) scan at 6 months to evaluate bone block incorporation of the femoral graft within the femoral tunnel, which was the study’s primary outcome. Secondary outcome measures included a postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, range-of-motion measures, and International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Demographic data were collected. RESULTS: Thirty-three patients (89%) completed the study’s 6-month follow-up, at which time the femoral ossification score was significantly greater in the aperture fixation group (p = 0.025). There was no substantial difference between the 2 groups with regard to any other outcome measure. CONCLUSIONS: Performing Achilles tendon allograft ACL reconstruction with femoral aperture fixation results in greater femoral bone block incorporation at 6 months postoperatively compared with what is seen after suspensory fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2020-04-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7418916/ /pubmed/33123662 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00057 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Scientific Articles
Yari, Shahram Shawn
El Naga, Ashraf N.
Patel, Amar
Qadeer, Ali Asaf
Shah, Anup
TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes
title TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes
title_full TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes
title_fullStr TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes
title_short TightRope Versus Biocomposite Interference Screw for Fixation in Allograft ACL Reconstruction: Prospective Evaluation of Osseous Integration and Patient Outcomes
title_sort tightrope versus biocomposite interference screw for fixation in allograft acl reconstruction: prospective evaluation of osseous integration and patient outcomes
topic Scientific Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418916/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33123662
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.19.00057
work_keys_str_mv AT yarishahramshawn tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstructionprospectiveevaluationofosseousintegrationandpatientoutcomes
AT elnagaashrafn tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstructionprospectiveevaluationofosseousintegrationandpatientoutcomes
AT patelamar tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstructionprospectiveevaluationofosseousintegrationandpatientoutcomes
AT qadeeraliasaf tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstructionprospectiveevaluationofosseousintegrationandpatientoutcomes
AT shahanup tightropeversusbiocompositeinterferencescrewforfixationinallograftaclreconstructionprospectiveevaluationofosseousintegrationandpatientoutcomes