Cargando…

Patient propagules: Do soil archives preserve the legacy of fungal and prokaryotic communities?

Soil archives are an important resource in agronomic and ecosystem sciences. If microbial communities could be reconstructed from archived soil DNA, as prehistoric plant communities are reconstructed via pollen data, soil archive resources would assume even greater value for reconstructing land-use...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benucci, Gian Maria Niccolò, Rennick, Bryan, Bonito, Gregory
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32780777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237368
_version_ 1783569789526999040
author Benucci, Gian Maria Niccolò
Rennick, Bryan
Bonito, Gregory
author_facet Benucci, Gian Maria Niccolò
Rennick, Bryan
Bonito, Gregory
author_sort Benucci, Gian Maria Niccolò
collection PubMed
description Soil archives are an important resource in agronomic and ecosystem sciences. If microbial communities could be reconstructed from archived soil DNA, as prehistoric plant communities are reconstructed via pollen data, soil archive resources would assume even greater value for reconstructing land-use history, forensic science, and biosphere modelling. Yet, the effects of long-term soil archival on the preservation of microbial DNA is still largely unknown. To address this, we assessed the capacity of high-throughput sequencing (Illumina MiSeq) of ITS (internal transcribed spacer) and prokaryotic 16S rRNA genes for reconstructing soil microbial communities across a 20 years time-series. We studied air-dried soil archives and fresh soil samples taken from Populus bioenergy and deciduous forest research plots at the Kellogg Biological Station. Habitat and archival time explained significant amounts of variation in soil microbial α- and β-diversity both in fungal and prokaryotic communities. We found that microbial richness, diversity, and abundance generally decreased with storage time, but varied between habitat and taxonomic groups. The high relative abundance of ectomycorrhizal species including Hebeloma and Cortinarius detected in older soil archives raises questions regarding traits such as long-term persistence and viability of ectomycorrhizal propagules in soils, with relevance to forest health and ecosystem succession. Talaromyces, Paecilomyces and Epicoccum spp. were detected in fresh and across 20-year-old archived soils and were also cultured from these soils demonstrating their long-term spore viability. In summary, we found that microbial DNA in air-dried soils archived over the past 20 years degraded with time, in a manner that differed between soil types and phylogenetic groups of microbes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7418970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74189702020-08-19 Patient propagules: Do soil archives preserve the legacy of fungal and prokaryotic communities? Benucci, Gian Maria Niccolò Rennick, Bryan Bonito, Gregory PLoS One Research Article Soil archives are an important resource in agronomic and ecosystem sciences. If microbial communities could be reconstructed from archived soil DNA, as prehistoric plant communities are reconstructed via pollen data, soil archive resources would assume even greater value for reconstructing land-use history, forensic science, and biosphere modelling. Yet, the effects of long-term soil archival on the preservation of microbial DNA is still largely unknown. To address this, we assessed the capacity of high-throughput sequencing (Illumina MiSeq) of ITS (internal transcribed spacer) and prokaryotic 16S rRNA genes for reconstructing soil microbial communities across a 20 years time-series. We studied air-dried soil archives and fresh soil samples taken from Populus bioenergy and deciduous forest research plots at the Kellogg Biological Station. Habitat and archival time explained significant amounts of variation in soil microbial α- and β-diversity both in fungal and prokaryotic communities. We found that microbial richness, diversity, and abundance generally decreased with storage time, but varied between habitat and taxonomic groups. The high relative abundance of ectomycorrhizal species including Hebeloma and Cortinarius detected in older soil archives raises questions regarding traits such as long-term persistence and viability of ectomycorrhizal propagules in soils, with relevance to forest health and ecosystem succession. Talaromyces, Paecilomyces and Epicoccum spp. were detected in fresh and across 20-year-old archived soils and were also cultured from these soils demonstrating their long-term spore viability. In summary, we found that microbial DNA in air-dried soils archived over the past 20 years degraded with time, in a manner that differed between soil types and phylogenetic groups of microbes. Public Library of Science 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7418970/ /pubmed/32780777 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237368 Text en © 2020 Benucci et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Benucci, Gian Maria Niccolò
Rennick, Bryan
Bonito, Gregory
Patient propagules: Do soil archives preserve the legacy of fungal and prokaryotic communities?
title Patient propagules: Do soil archives preserve the legacy of fungal and prokaryotic communities?
title_full Patient propagules: Do soil archives preserve the legacy of fungal and prokaryotic communities?
title_fullStr Patient propagules: Do soil archives preserve the legacy of fungal and prokaryotic communities?
title_full_unstemmed Patient propagules: Do soil archives preserve the legacy of fungal and prokaryotic communities?
title_short Patient propagules: Do soil archives preserve the legacy of fungal and prokaryotic communities?
title_sort patient propagules: do soil archives preserve the legacy of fungal and prokaryotic communities?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7418970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32780777
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237368
work_keys_str_mv AT benuccigianmarianiccolo patientpropagulesdosoilarchivespreservethelegacyoffungalandprokaryoticcommunities
AT rennickbryan patientpropagulesdosoilarchivespreservethelegacyoffungalandprokaryoticcommunities
AT bonitogregory patientpropagulesdosoilarchivespreservethelegacyoffungalandprokaryoticcommunities