Cargando…
Stability of yield and its components in grafted tomato tested across multiple environments in Texas
Grafting with vigorous rootstocks could offer tomato growers in Texas sustainable and efficient option to achieve reliable yield across a range of production systems and locations. Genotypes (G) of grafted and non-grafted tomato were grown in different environments (E) in the 2017 and 2018 spring se...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7419296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32782333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70548-3 |
_version_ | 1783569853355917312 |
---|---|
author | Djidonou, Desire Leskovar, Daniel I. Joshi, Madhumita Jifon, John Avila, Carlos A. Masabni, Joseph Wallace, Russell W. Crosby, Kevin |
author_facet | Djidonou, Desire Leskovar, Daniel I. Joshi, Madhumita Jifon, John Avila, Carlos A. Masabni, Joseph Wallace, Russell W. Crosby, Kevin |
author_sort | Djidonou, Desire |
collection | PubMed |
description | Grafting with vigorous rootstocks could offer tomato growers in Texas sustainable and efficient option to achieve reliable yield across a range of production systems and locations. Genotypes (G) of grafted and non-grafted tomato were grown in different environments (E) in the 2017 and 2018 spring seasons. The objectives of the study were to (i) evaluate the effects of production system and grafting on tomato yield traits, (ii) determine the size of genotypic and genotype by environment interaction (G × E) variance components, and (iii) evaluate the relative stability of tested genotypes for yield and its components across production environments. In 2017, genotypes were non-grafted ‘TAMU Hot Ty’ (TAM) and ‘Tycoon’ (TY) and each grafted on commercial tomato rootstocks ‘Estamino’ (TAM/ES, TY/ES) and ‘Multifort’ (TAM/MU, TY/MU) while in 2018, TAM and ‘HM1823’ (HM) were grafted on ‘Estamino’ (TAM/ES, HM/ES) and ‘Multifort’ (TAM/MU, HM/MU). Testing environments were high tunnel (HT) and open-field (OF) in Uvalde in 2017 while in 2018, these were HT and OF in Lubbock (LU-HT, LU-OF), Overton (OV-HT, OV-OF), Uvalde (UV-HT, UV-OF), and Weslaco (WE-HT, WE-OF). Total and marketable yields, fruit number per plant, and average fruit weight were significantly affected by E, G, and G × E interaction. Environmental component contributed 71–86% to the total variation for all these traits, while genotype explained 1.5–10.8%, and the contribution of G × E ranged between 4.3 to 6.7%. Estimation of the univariate statistic parameters and genotype plus genotype × environment (GGE) biplot analysis indicated that HM/MU and HM/ES were the most stable graft combination with the highest total and marketable yields, while TAM/ES was very unstable for yields across test environments. TAM/MU was stable but with yield lower than the grand mean. These results suggest that high tomato yields could be consistently achieved with grafted combination (HM/MU and HM/ES) especially under high tunnel production system across the regions of Texas. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7419296 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74192962020-08-13 Stability of yield and its components in grafted tomato tested across multiple environments in Texas Djidonou, Desire Leskovar, Daniel I. Joshi, Madhumita Jifon, John Avila, Carlos A. Masabni, Joseph Wallace, Russell W. Crosby, Kevin Sci Rep Article Grafting with vigorous rootstocks could offer tomato growers in Texas sustainable and efficient option to achieve reliable yield across a range of production systems and locations. Genotypes (G) of grafted and non-grafted tomato were grown in different environments (E) in the 2017 and 2018 spring seasons. The objectives of the study were to (i) evaluate the effects of production system and grafting on tomato yield traits, (ii) determine the size of genotypic and genotype by environment interaction (G × E) variance components, and (iii) evaluate the relative stability of tested genotypes for yield and its components across production environments. In 2017, genotypes were non-grafted ‘TAMU Hot Ty’ (TAM) and ‘Tycoon’ (TY) and each grafted on commercial tomato rootstocks ‘Estamino’ (TAM/ES, TY/ES) and ‘Multifort’ (TAM/MU, TY/MU) while in 2018, TAM and ‘HM1823’ (HM) were grafted on ‘Estamino’ (TAM/ES, HM/ES) and ‘Multifort’ (TAM/MU, HM/MU). Testing environments were high tunnel (HT) and open-field (OF) in Uvalde in 2017 while in 2018, these were HT and OF in Lubbock (LU-HT, LU-OF), Overton (OV-HT, OV-OF), Uvalde (UV-HT, UV-OF), and Weslaco (WE-HT, WE-OF). Total and marketable yields, fruit number per plant, and average fruit weight were significantly affected by E, G, and G × E interaction. Environmental component contributed 71–86% to the total variation for all these traits, while genotype explained 1.5–10.8%, and the contribution of G × E ranged between 4.3 to 6.7%. Estimation of the univariate statistic parameters and genotype plus genotype × environment (GGE) biplot analysis indicated that HM/MU and HM/ES were the most stable graft combination with the highest total and marketable yields, while TAM/ES was very unstable for yields across test environments. TAM/MU was stable but with yield lower than the grand mean. These results suggest that high tomato yields could be consistently achieved with grafted combination (HM/MU and HM/ES) especially under high tunnel production system across the regions of Texas. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7419296/ /pubmed/32782333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70548-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Djidonou, Desire Leskovar, Daniel I. Joshi, Madhumita Jifon, John Avila, Carlos A. Masabni, Joseph Wallace, Russell W. Crosby, Kevin Stability of yield and its components in grafted tomato tested across multiple environments in Texas |
title | Stability of yield and its components in grafted tomato tested across multiple environments in Texas |
title_full | Stability of yield and its components in grafted tomato tested across multiple environments in Texas |
title_fullStr | Stability of yield and its components in grafted tomato tested across multiple environments in Texas |
title_full_unstemmed | Stability of yield and its components in grafted tomato tested across multiple environments in Texas |
title_short | Stability of yield and its components in grafted tomato tested across multiple environments in Texas |
title_sort | stability of yield and its components in grafted tomato tested across multiple environments in texas |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7419296/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32782333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70548-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT djidonoudesire stabilityofyieldanditscomponentsingraftedtomatotestedacrossmultipleenvironmentsintexas AT leskovardanieli stabilityofyieldanditscomponentsingraftedtomatotestedacrossmultipleenvironmentsintexas AT joshimadhumita stabilityofyieldanditscomponentsingraftedtomatotestedacrossmultipleenvironmentsintexas AT jifonjohn stabilityofyieldanditscomponentsingraftedtomatotestedacrossmultipleenvironmentsintexas AT avilacarlosa stabilityofyieldanditscomponentsingraftedtomatotestedacrossmultipleenvironmentsintexas AT masabnijoseph stabilityofyieldanditscomponentsingraftedtomatotestedacrossmultipleenvironmentsintexas AT wallacerussellw stabilityofyieldanditscomponentsingraftedtomatotestedacrossmultipleenvironmentsintexas AT crosbykevin stabilityofyieldanditscomponentsingraftedtomatotestedacrossmultipleenvironmentsintexas |