Cargando…

An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements

OBJECTIVES: The last decade has seen a variety of modifications of glass-ionomer cements (GICs), such as inclusion of bioactive glass particles and dispensing systems. Hence, the aim was to systematically evaluate effect of mixing modes and presence of reactive glass additives on the physical proper...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al-Taee, Lamis, Deb, Sanjukta, Banerjee, Avijit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7419565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-020-0040-x
_version_ 1783569910705684480
author Al-Taee, Lamis
Deb, Sanjukta
Banerjee, Avijit
author_facet Al-Taee, Lamis
Deb, Sanjukta
Banerjee, Avijit
author_sort Al-Taee, Lamis
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The last decade has seen a variety of modifications of glass-ionomer cements (GICs), such as inclusion of bioactive glass particles and dispensing systems. Hence, the aim was to systematically evaluate effect of mixing modes and presence of reactive glass additives on the physical properties of several GICs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The physical properties of eight commercial restorative GICs; Fuji IX GP Extra (C&H), Ketac(TM) Fill Plus Applicap (C&H), Fuji II LC (C&H), Glass Carbomer Cement and Equia® Forte Fil, capsulated versus manually mixed were assessed. 256 cylindrical specimens were prepared for compressive strength and microhardness, whilst 128 disc-shaped specimens were prepared for biaxial flexural strength tests. Fluid uptake and fluoride release were assessed. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Games-Howell post-hoc tests (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Both encapsulated GIC/RMGICs exhibited significantly improved mechanical properties in comparison to manually mixed equivalents, which in turn showed higher fluid uptake and early fluoride release (p < 0.05). The glass carbomer cement exhibited improved mechanical properties post ageing and evidence of mineral deposits were apparent in the microstructure. CONCLUSIONS: The mixing mode and inclusion of reactive glass additives in cements had a statistically significant effect on physical properties of the selected GICs-RMGICs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7419565
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74195652020-08-18 An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements Al-Taee, Lamis Deb, Sanjukta Banerjee, Avijit BDJ Open Article OBJECTIVES: The last decade has seen a variety of modifications of glass-ionomer cements (GICs), such as inclusion of bioactive glass particles and dispensing systems. Hence, the aim was to systematically evaluate effect of mixing modes and presence of reactive glass additives on the physical properties of several GICs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The physical properties of eight commercial restorative GICs; Fuji IX GP Extra (C&H), Ketac(TM) Fill Plus Applicap (C&H), Fuji II LC (C&H), Glass Carbomer Cement and Equia® Forte Fil, capsulated versus manually mixed were assessed. 256 cylindrical specimens were prepared for compressive strength and microhardness, whilst 128 disc-shaped specimens were prepared for biaxial flexural strength tests. Fluid uptake and fluoride release were assessed. Data were analysed using one-way ANOVA and Games-Howell post-hoc tests (alpha = 0.05). RESULTS: Both encapsulated GIC/RMGICs exhibited significantly improved mechanical properties in comparison to manually mixed equivalents, which in turn showed higher fluid uptake and early fluoride release (p < 0.05). The glass carbomer cement exhibited improved mechanical properties post ageing and evidence of mineral deposits were apparent in the microstructure. CONCLUSIONS: The mixing mode and inclusion of reactive glass additives in cements had a statistically significant effect on physical properties of the selected GICs-RMGICs. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7419565/ /pubmed/32821430 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-020-0040-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Al-Taee, Lamis
Deb, Sanjukta
Banerjee, Avijit
An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements
title An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements
title_full An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements
title_fullStr An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements
title_full_unstemmed An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements
title_short An in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements
title_sort in vitro assessment of the physical properties of manually- mixed and encapsulated glass-ionomer cements
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7419565/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821430
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41405-020-0040-x
work_keys_str_mv AT altaeelamis aninvitroassessmentofthephysicalpropertiesofmanuallymixedandencapsulatedglassionomercements
AT debsanjukta aninvitroassessmentofthephysicalpropertiesofmanuallymixedandencapsulatedglassionomercements
AT banerjeeavijit aninvitroassessmentofthephysicalpropertiesofmanuallymixedandencapsulatedglassionomercements
AT altaeelamis invitroassessmentofthephysicalpropertiesofmanuallymixedandencapsulatedglassionomercements
AT debsanjukta invitroassessmentofthephysicalpropertiesofmanuallymixedandencapsulatedglassionomercements
AT banerjeeavijit invitroassessmentofthephysicalpropertiesofmanuallymixedandencapsulatedglassionomercements