Cargando…

Physician perspectives on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine and the national evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine information website: A mixed-method study

BACKGROUND: The evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine (eJIM) website was launched by the Japanese government in 2014 to provide information on integrative medicine to the general public and physicians. While Japanese physicians discourage the use of traditional, complementary, and integrative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Motoo, Yoshiharu, Yukawa, Keiko, Hisamura, Kazuho, Arai, Ichiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7419573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100454
_version_ 1783569912335171584
author Motoo, Yoshiharu
Yukawa, Keiko
Hisamura, Kazuho
Arai, Ichiro
author_facet Motoo, Yoshiharu
Yukawa, Keiko
Hisamura, Kazuho
Arai, Ichiro
author_sort Motoo, Yoshiharu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine (eJIM) website was launched by the Japanese government in 2014 to provide information on integrative medicine to the general public and physicians. While Japanese physicians discourage the use of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM), there are very few reports that explore this issue. We aimed to understand the attitudes of Japanese physicians towards TCIM and evaluate the usability of the eJIM website according to physicians. METHODS: We conducted a two-staged, mixed-method study with interviews and an internet-based survey. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 12 physicians who worked for large-scale hospitals in two different areas of Japan. We assessed their understanding of TCIM and the usability of the eJIM website. Based on the interviews, the internet survey was developed and was conducted in February 2019. RESULTS: In the interviews, 12 physicians provided their opinion on TCIM and highlighted important areas, such as increasing the resources available for patients, and ensuring more information on TCIM is available. The internet survey of 231 physicians showed that 35% of the physicians used or advised on TCIM in clinical practice. Kampo medicines (87.8%) and dietary supplements (24.7%) were common. The physicians did not use TCIM primarily because of concerns regarding its efficacy, safety, and cost. Most physicians were not aware of which TCIM their patients used. CONCLUSION: Physicians in Japan may not have comprehensively understood TCIM and do not actively use TCIM. The eJIM website could help physicians to gain a better understanding of TCIM if improvements are made.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7419573
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74195732020-08-14 Physician perspectives on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine and the national evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine information website: A mixed-method study Motoo, Yoshiharu Yukawa, Keiko Hisamura, Kazuho Arai, Ichiro Integr Med Res Original Article BACKGROUND: The evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine (eJIM) website was launched by the Japanese government in 2014 to provide information on integrative medicine to the general public and physicians. While Japanese physicians discourage the use of traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine (TCIM), there are very few reports that explore this issue. We aimed to understand the attitudes of Japanese physicians towards TCIM and evaluate the usability of the eJIM website according to physicians. METHODS: We conducted a two-staged, mixed-method study with interviews and an internet-based survey. Face-to-face interviews were conducted with 12 physicians who worked for large-scale hospitals in two different areas of Japan. We assessed their understanding of TCIM and the usability of the eJIM website. Based on the interviews, the internet survey was developed and was conducted in February 2019. RESULTS: In the interviews, 12 physicians provided their opinion on TCIM and highlighted important areas, such as increasing the resources available for patients, and ensuring more information on TCIM is available. The internet survey of 231 physicians showed that 35% of the physicians used or advised on TCIM in clinical practice. Kampo medicines (87.8%) and dietary supplements (24.7%) were common. The physicians did not use TCIM primarily because of concerns regarding its efficacy, safety, and cost. Most physicians were not aware of which TCIM their patients used. CONCLUSION: Physicians in Japan may not have comprehensively understood TCIM and do not actively use TCIM. The eJIM website could help physicians to gain a better understanding of TCIM if improvements are made. Elsevier 2021-03 2020-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7419573/ /pubmed/32802740 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100454 Text en © 2020 Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Motoo, Yoshiharu
Yukawa, Keiko
Hisamura, Kazuho
Arai, Ichiro
Physician perspectives on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine and the national evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine information website: A mixed-method study
title Physician perspectives on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine and the national evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine information website: A mixed-method study
title_full Physician perspectives on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine and the national evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine information website: A mixed-method study
title_fullStr Physician perspectives on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine and the national evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine information website: A mixed-method study
title_full_unstemmed Physician perspectives on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine and the national evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine information website: A mixed-method study
title_short Physician perspectives on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine and the national evidence-based Japanese integrative medicine information website: A mixed-method study
title_sort physician perspectives on traditional, complementary, and integrative medicine and the national evidence-based japanese integrative medicine information website: a mixed-method study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7419573/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802740
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.imr.2020.100454
work_keys_str_mv AT motooyoshiharu physicianperspectivesontraditionalcomplementaryandintegrativemedicineandthenationalevidencebasedjapaneseintegrativemedicineinformationwebsiteamixedmethodstudy
AT yukawakeiko physicianperspectivesontraditionalcomplementaryandintegrativemedicineandthenationalevidencebasedjapaneseintegrativemedicineinformationwebsiteamixedmethodstudy
AT hisamurakazuho physicianperspectivesontraditionalcomplementaryandintegrativemedicineandthenationalevidencebasedjapaneseintegrativemedicineinformationwebsiteamixedmethodstudy
AT araiichiro physicianperspectivesontraditionalcomplementaryandintegrativemedicineandthenationalevidencebasedjapaneseintegrativemedicineinformationwebsiteamixedmethodstudy