Cargando…

Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE: Nurses provide care at each phase of the complex, perioperative pathway and are well placed to identify areas of care requiring investigation in randomized controlled trials. Yet, currently, the scope of nurse-led randomized controlled trials conducted within the perioperative setting are u...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Munday, Judy, Higgins, Niall, Mathew, Saira, Dalgleish, Lizanne, Batterbury, Anthony S, Burgess, Luke, Campbell, Jill, Delaney, Lori J, Griffin, Bronwyn R, Hughes, James A, Ingleman, Jessica, Keogh, Samantha, Coyer, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7419608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821111
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S255785
_version_ 1783569919884918784
author Munday, Judy
Higgins, Niall
Mathew, Saira
Dalgleish, Lizanne
Batterbury, Anthony S
Burgess, Luke
Campbell, Jill
Delaney, Lori J
Griffin, Bronwyn R
Hughes, James A
Ingleman, Jessica
Keogh, Samantha
Coyer, Fiona
author_facet Munday, Judy
Higgins, Niall
Mathew, Saira
Dalgleish, Lizanne
Batterbury, Anthony S
Burgess, Luke
Campbell, Jill
Delaney, Lori J
Griffin, Bronwyn R
Hughes, James A
Ingleman, Jessica
Keogh, Samantha
Coyer, Fiona
author_sort Munday, Judy
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Nurses provide care at each phase of the complex, perioperative pathway and are well placed to identify areas of care requiring investigation in randomized controlled trials. Yet, currently, the scope of nurse-led randomized controlled trials conducted within the perioperative setting are unknown. This scoping review aims to identify areas of perioperative care in which nurse-led randomized controlled trials have been conducted, to identify issues impacting upon the quality of these trials and identify gaps for future investigation. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted in reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with a date range of 2014–19. Sources of unpublished literature included Open Grey, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses, Clinical Trials.gov and the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. After title and abstract checking, full-text retrieval and data extraction, studies were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists for randomized controlled trials. Data were synthesized according to the main objectives. Key information was tabulated. RESULTS: From the 86 included studies, key areas where nurses have led randomized controlled trials include patient or caregiver anxiety; postoperative pain relief; surgical site infection prevention: patient and caregiver knowledge; perioperative hypothermia prevention; postoperative nausea and vomiting; in addition to other diverse outcomes. Issues impacting upon quality (including poorly reported randomization), and gaps for future investigation (including a focus on vulnerable populations), are evident. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led randomized controlled trials in the perioperative setting have focused on key areas of perioperative care. Yet, opportunities exist for nurses to lead experimental research in other perioperative priority areas and within different populations that have been neglected, such as in the population of older adults undergoing surgery.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7419608
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74196082020-08-19 Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review Munday, Judy Higgins, Niall Mathew, Saira Dalgleish, Lizanne Batterbury, Anthony S Burgess, Luke Campbell, Jill Delaney, Lori J Griffin, Bronwyn R Hughes, James A Ingleman, Jessica Keogh, Samantha Coyer, Fiona J Multidiscip Healthc Review PURPOSE: Nurses provide care at each phase of the complex, perioperative pathway and are well placed to identify areas of care requiring investigation in randomized controlled trials. Yet, currently, the scope of nurse-led randomized controlled trials conducted within the perioperative setting are unknown. This scoping review aims to identify areas of perioperative care in which nurse-led randomized controlled trials have been conducted, to identify issues impacting upon the quality of these trials and identify gaps for future investigation. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted in reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with a date range of 2014–19. Sources of unpublished literature included Open Grey, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses, Clinical Trials.gov and the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. After title and abstract checking, full-text retrieval and data extraction, studies were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists for randomized controlled trials. Data were synthesized according to the main objectives. Key information was tabulated. RESULTS: From the 86 included studies, key areas where nurses have led randomized controlled trials include patient or caregiver anxiety; postoperative pain relief; surgical site infection prevention: patient and caregiver knowledge; perioperative hypothermia prevention; postoperative nausea and vomiting; in addition to other diverse outcomes. Issues impacting upon quality (including poorly reported randomization), and gaps for future investigation (including a focus on vulnerable populations), are evident. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led randomized controlled trials in the perioperative setting have focused on key areas of perioperative care. Yet, opportunities exist for nurses to lead experimental research in other perioperative priority areas and within different populations that have been neglected, such as in the population of older adults undergoing surgery. Dove 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7419608/ /pubmed/32821111 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S255785 Text en © 2020 Munday et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Munday, Judy
Higgins, Niall
Mathew, Saira
Dalgleish, Lizanne
Batterbury, Anthony S
Burgess, Luke
Campbell, Jill
Delaney, Lori J
Griffin, Bronwyn R
Hughes, James A
Ingleman, Jessica
Keogh, Samantha
Coyer, Fiona
Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review
title Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review
title_full Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review
title_fullStr Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review
title_short Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review
title_sort nurse-led randomized controlled trials in the perioperative setting: a scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7419608/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821111
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S255785
work_keys_str_mv AT mundayjudy nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview
AT higginsniall nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview
AT mathewsaira nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview
AT dalgleishlizanne nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview
AT batterburyanthonys nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview
AT burgessluke nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview
AT campbelljill nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview
AT delaneylorij nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview
AT griffinbronwynr nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview
AT hughesjamesa nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview
AT inglemanjessica nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview
AT keoghsamantha nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview
AT coyerfiona nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview