Cargando…
Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review
PURPOSE: Nurses provide care at each phase of the complex, perioperative pathway and are well placed to identify areas of care requiring investigation in randomized controlled trials. Yet, currently, the scope of nurse-led randomized controlled trials conducted within the perioperative setting are u...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7419608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821111 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S255785 |
_version_ | 1783569919884918784 |
---|---|
author | Munday, Judy Higgins, Niall Mathew, Saira Dalgleish, Lizanne Batterbury, Anthony S Burgess, Luke Campbell, Jill Delaney, Lori J Griffin, Bronwyn R Hughes, James A Ingleman, Jessica Keogh, Samantha Coyer, Fiona |
author_facet | Munday, Judy Higgins, Niall Mathew, Saira Dalgleish, Lizanne Batterbury, Anthony S Burgess, Luke Campbell, Jill Delaney, Lori J Griffin, Bronwyn R Hughes, James A Ingleman, Jessica Keogh, Samantha Coyer, Fiona |
author_sort | Munday, Judy |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Nurses provide care at each phase of the complex, perioperative pathway and are well placed to identify areas of care requiring investigation in randomized controlled trials. Yet, currently, the scope of nurse-led randomized controlled trials conducted within the perioperative setting are unknown. This scoping review aims to identify areas of perioperative care in which nurse-led randomized controlled trials have been conducted, to identify issues impacting upon the quality of these trials and identify gaps for future investigation. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted in reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with a date range of 2014–19. Sources of unpublished literature included Open Grey, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses, Clinical Trials.gov and the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. After title and abstract checking, full-text retrieval and data extraction, studies were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists for randomized controlled trials. Data were synthesized according to the main objectives. Key information was tabulated. RESULTS: From the 86 included studies, key areas where nurses have led randomized controlled trials include patient or caregiver anxiety; postoperative pain relief; surgical site infection prevention: patient and caregiver knowledge; perioperative hypothermia prevention; postoperative nausea and vomiting; in addition to other diverse outcomes. Issues impacting upon quality (including poorly reported randomization), and gaps for future investigation (including a focus on vulnerable populations), are evident. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led randomized controlled trials in the perioperative setting have focused on key areas of perioperative care. Yet, opportunities exist for nurses to lead experimental research in other perioperative priority areas and within different populations that have been neglected, such as in the population of older adults undergoing surgery. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7419608 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Dove |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74196082020-08-19 Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review Munday, Judy Higgins, Niall Mathew, Saira Dalgleish, Lizanne Batterbury, Anthony S Burgess, Luke Campbell, Jill Delaney, Lori J Griffin, Bronwyn R Hughes, James A Ingleman, Jessica Keogh, Samantha Coyer, Fiona J Multidiscip Healthc Review PURPOSE: Nurses provide care at each phase of the complex, perioperative pathway and are well placed to identify areas of care requiring investigation in randomized controlled trials. Yet, currently, the scope of nurse-led randomized controlled trials conducted within the perioperative setting are unknown. This scoping review aims to identify areas of perioperative care in which nurse-led randomized controlled trials have been conducted, to identify issues impacting upon the quality of these trials and identify gaps for future investigation. METHODS: This scoping review was conducted in reference to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, with a date range of 2014–19. Sources of unpublished literature included Open Grey, and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses, Clinical Trials.gov and the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry. After title and abstract checking, full-text retrieval and data extraction, studies were appraised using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Checklists for randomized controlled trials. Data were synthesized according to the main objectives. Key information was tabulated. RESULTS: From the 86 included studies, key areas where nurses have led randomized controlled trials include patient or caregiver anxiety; postoperative pain relief; surgical site infection prevention: patient and caregiver knowledge; perioperative hypothermia prevention; postoperative nausea and vomiting; in addition to other diverse outcomes. Issues impacting upon quality (including poorly reported randomization), and gaps for future investigation (including a focus on vulnerable populations), are evident. CONCLUSION: Nurse-led randomized controlled trials in the perioperative setting have focused on key areas of perioperative care. Yet, opportunities exist for nurses to lead experimental research in other perioperative priority areas and within different populations that have been neglected, such as in the population of older adults undergoing surgery. Dove 2020-07-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7419608/ /pubmed/32821111 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S255785 Text en © 2020 Munday et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This work is published by Dove Medical Press Limited, and licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. The full terms of the License are available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Review Munday, Judy Higgins, Niall Mathew, Saira Dalgleish, Lizanne Batterbury, Anthony S Burgess, Luke Campbell, Jill Delaney, Lori J Griffin, Bronwyn R Hughes, James A Ingleman, Jessica Keogh, Samantha Coyer, Fiona Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review |
title | Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review |
title_full | Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review |
title_fullStr | Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review |
title_short | Nurse-Led Randomized Controlled Trials in the Perioperative Setting: A Scoping Review |
title_sort | nurse-led randomized controlled trials in the perioperative setting: a scoping review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7419608/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821111 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S255785 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mundayjudy nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview AT higginsniall nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview AT mathewsaira nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview AT dalgleishlizanne nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview AT batterburyanthonys nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview AT burgessluke nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview AT campbelljill nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview AT delaneylorij nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview AT griffinbronwynr nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview AT hughesjamesa nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview AT inglemanjessica nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview AT keoghsamantha nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview AT coyerfiona nurseledrandomizedcontrolledtrialsintheperioperativesettingascopingreview |