Cargando…

Remote Care for Caregivers of People With Psychosis: Mixed Methods Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: A reduced availability of resources has hampered the implementation of family work in psychosis. Web-based support programs have the potential to increase access to high-quality, standardized resources. This pilot study tested the Norwegian version of the Relatives Education and Coping T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romm, Kristin Lie, Nilsen, Liv, Gjermundsen, Kristine, Holter, Marit, Fjell, Anne, Melle, Ingrid, Repål, Arne, Lobban, Fiona
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7420633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32720905
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19497
_version_ 1783569967351857152
author Romm, Kristin Lie
Nilsen, Liv
Gjermundsen, Kristine
Holter, Marit
Fjell, Anne
Melle, Ingrid
Repål, Arne
Lobban, Fiona
author_facet Romm, Kristin Lie
Nilsen, Liv
Gjermundsen, Kristine
Holter, Marit
Fjell, Anne
Melle, Ingrid
Repål, Arne
Lobban, Fiona
author_sort Romm, Kristin Lie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A reduced availability of resources has hampered the implementation of family work in psychosis. Web-based support programs have the potential to increase access to high-quality, standardized resources. This pilot study tested the Norwegian version of the Relatives Education and Coping Toolkit (REACT), a web-based United Kingdom National Health Service program in combination with phone-based support by trained family therapists. OBJECTIVE: We investigated how the program was perceived by its users and identified the facilitators and barriers to its clinical implementation. METHODS: Relatives of people with psychosis were offered access to REACT and to weekly family therapist support (with 1 of 2 trained family therapists) for 26 weeks. Level of distress and level of expressed emotion data were collected at baseline and after 26 weeks using the Family Questionnaire and the Relatives Stress Scale. Both family therapists and a subset of the relatives were interviewed about their experiences after completing the program. RESULTS: During the program, relatives (n=19) had a median of 8 (range 4-11) consultations with the family therapists. Postintervention, there was a significant reduction in stress and in expressed emotions in the relatives of people with psychosis. Interviews with the relatives (n=7) and the family therapists (n=2) indicated the following themes as important—the intervention turned knowledge into action; the intervention strengthened the feeling of being involved and taken seriously by the health services; and management support and the ability for self-referral were important, while lack of reimbursement and clinician resistance to technology were barriers to implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The service was found to offer a valued clinical benefit; however, strategies that aim to engage clinicians and increase organizational support toward new technology need to be developed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7420633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74206332020-08-20 Remote Care for Caregivers of People With Psychosis: Mixed Methods Pilot Study Romm, Kristin Lie Nilsen, Liv Gjermundsen, Kristine Holter, Marit Fjell, Anne Melle, Ingrid Repål, Arne Lobban, Fiona JMIR Ment Health Original Paper BACKGROUND: A reduced availability of resources has hampered the implementation of family work in psychosis. Web-based support programs have the potential to increase access to high-quality, standardized resources. This pilot study tested the Norwegian version of the Relatives Education and Coping Toolkit (REACT), a web-based United Kingdom National Health Service program in combination with phone-based support by trained family therapists. OBJECTIVE: We investigated how the program was perceived by its users and identified the facilitators and barriers to its clinical implementation. METHODS: Relatives of people with psychosis were offered access to REACT and to weekly family therapist support (with 1 of 2 trained family therapists) for 26 weeks. Level of distress and level of expressed emotion data were collected at baseline and after 26 weeks using the Family Questionnaire and the Relatives Stress Scale. Both family therapists and a subset of the relatives were interviewed about their experiences after completing the program. RESULTS: During the program, relatives (n=19) had a median of 8 (range 4-11) consultations with the family therapists. Postintervention, there was a significant reduction in stress and in expressed emotions in the relatives of people with psychosis. Interviews with the relatives (n=7) and the family therapists (n=2) indicated the following themes as important—the intervention turned knowledge into action; the intervention strengthened the feeling of being involved and taken seriously by the health services; and management support and the ability for self-referral were important, while lack of reimbursement and clinician resistance to technology were barriers to implementation. CONCLUSIONS: The service was found to offer a valued clinical benefit; however, strategies that aim to engage clinicians and increase organizational support toward new technology need to be developed. JMIR Publications 2020-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7420633/ /pubmed/32720905 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19497 Text en ©Kristin Lie Romm, Liv Nilsen, Kristine Gjermundsen, Marit Holter, Anne Fjell, Ingrid Melle, Arne Repål, Fiona Lobban. Originally published in JMIR Mental Health (http://mental.jmir.org), 28.07.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Mental Health, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://mental.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Romm, Kristin Lie
Nilsen, Liv
Gjermundsen, Kristine
Holter, Marit
Fjell, Anne
Melle, Ingrid
Repål, Arne
Lobban, Fiona
Remote Care for Caregivers of People With Psychosis: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
title Remote Care for Caregivers of People With Psychosis: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
title_full Remote Care for Caregivers of People With Psychosis: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
title_fullStr Remote Care for Caregivers of People With Psychosis: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Remote Care for Caregivers of People With Psychosis: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
title_short Remote Care for Caregivers of People With Psychosis: Mixed Methods Pilot Study
title_sort remote care for caregivers of people with psychosis: mixed methods pilot study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7420633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32720905
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/19497
work_keys_str_mv AT rommkristinlie remotecareforcaregiversofpeoplewithpsychosismixedmethodspilotstudy
AT nilsenliv remotecareforcaregiversofpeoplewithpsychosismixedmethodspilotstudy
AT gjermundsenkristine remotecareforcaregiversofpeoplewithpsychosismixedmethodspilotstudy
AT holtermarit remotecareforcaregiversofpeoplewithpsychosismixedmethodspilotstudy
AT fjellanne remotecareforcaregiversofpeoplewithpsychosismixedmethodspilotstudy
AT melleingrid remotecareforcaregiversofpeoplewithpsychosismixedmethodspilotstudy
AT repalarne remotecareforcaregiversofpeoplewithpsychosismixedmethodspilotstudy
AT lobbanfiona remotecareforcaregiversofpeoplewithpsychosismixedmethodspilotstudy