Cargando…

Combining visual analytics and case-based reasoning for rupture risk assessment of intracranial aneurysms

PURPOSE: Medical case-based reasoning solves problems by applying experience gained from the outcome of previous treatments of the same kind. Particularly for complex treatment decisions, for example, incidentally found intracranial aneurysms (IAs), it can support the medical expert. IAs bear the ri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spitz, Lena, Niemann, Uli, Beuing, Oliver, Neyazi, Belal, Sandalcioglu, I. Erol, Preim, Bernhard, Saalfeld, Sylvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7420879/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32623613
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11548-020-02217-9
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: Medical case-based reasoning solves problems by applying experience gained from the outcome of previous treatments of the same kind. Particularly for complex treatment decisions, for example, incidentally found intracranial aneurysms (IAs), it can support the medical expert. IAs bear the risk of rupture and may lead to subarachnoidal hemorrhages. Treatment needs to be considered carefully, since it may entail unnecessary complications for IAs with low rupture risk. With a rupture risk prediction based on previous cases, the treatment decision can be supported. METHODS: We present an interactive visual exploration tool for the case-based reasoning of IAs. In presence of a new aneurysm of interest, our application provides visual analytics techniques to identify the most similar cases with respect to morphology. The clinical expert can obtain the treatment, including the treatment outcome, for these cases and transfer it to the aneurysm of interest. Our application comprises a heatmap visualization, an adapted scatterplot matrix and fully or partially directed graphs with a circle- or force-directed layout to guide the interactive selection process. To fit the demands of clinical applications, we further integrated an interactive identification of outlier cases as well as an interactive attribute selection for the similarity calculation. A questionnaire evaluation with six trained physicians was used. RESULT: Our application allows for case-based reasoning of IAs based on a reference data set. Three classifiers summarize the rupture state of the most similar cases. Medical experts positively evaluated the application. CONCLUSION: Our case-based reasoning application combined with visual analytic techniques allows for representation of similar IAs to support the clinician. The graphical representation was rated very useful and provides visual information of the similarity of the k most similar cases.