Cargando…

Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks

We are currently witnessing the emergence of new forms of collective identities and a redefinition of the old ones through networked digital interactions, and these can be explicitly measured and analyzed. We distinguish between three major trends on the development of the concept of identity in the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barandiaran, Xabier E., Calleja-López, Antonio, Cozzo, Emanuele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848986
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01549
_version_ 1783570016388513792
author Barandiaran, Xabier E.
Calleja-López, Antonio
Cozzo, Emanuele
author_facet Barandiaran, Xabier E.
Calleja-López, Antonio
Cozzo, Emanuele
author_sort Barandiaran, Xabier E.
collection PubMed
description We are currently witnessing the emergence of new forms of collective identities and a redefinition of the old ones through networked digital interactions, and these can be explicitly measured and analyzed. We distinguish between three major trends on the development of the concept of identity in the social realm: (1) an essentialist sense (based on conditions and properties shared by members of a group), (2) a representational or ideational sense (based on the application of categories by oneself or others), and (3) a relational and interactional sense (based on interaction processes between actors and their environments). The interactional approach aligns with current empirical and methodological progress in social network analysis. Moreover, it has been argued that, within the network society, the notion of collective identity (Melucci, 1995) in the political field must be rethought as technologically mediated and interactive. We suggest that collective identities should be understood as recurrent, cohesive, and coordinated communicative interaction networks. We here propose that such identities can be depicted by: (a) mapping and filtering a relevant interaction network, (b) delimiting a set of communities, (c) determining the strongly connected component(s) of such communities (the core identity) in a directed graph, and (d) defining the identity audiences and sources within the community. This technical graph–theoretical characterization is explained and justified in detail through a toy model and applied to three empirical case studies to characterize political identities in party politics (communicative interaction in Twitter during the Spanish elections in 2018), contentious politics in confrontation (in Twitter during the Catalan strike for independence 2019), and the multitudinous identity of Spanish Indignados/15 social movement (in Facebook fan pages 2011). We discuss how the proposed definition is useful to delimit and characterize the internal structure of collective identities in technopolitical interaction networks, and we suggest how the proposed methods can be improved and complemented with other approaches. We finally draw the theoretical implications of understanding collective identities as emerging from interaction networks in a progressive platformization of social interactions in a digital world.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7422503
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74225032020-08-25 Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks Barandiaran, Xabier E. Calleja-López, Antonio Cozzo, Emanuele Front Psychol Psychology We are currently witnessing the emergence of new forms of collective identities and a redefinition of the old ones through networked digital interactions, and these can be explicitly measured and analyzed. We distinguish between three major trends on the development of the concept of identity in the social realm: (1) an essentialist sense (based on conditions and properties shared by members of a group), (2) a representational or ideational sense (based on the application of categories by oneself or others), and (3) a relational and interactional sense (based on interaction processes between actors and their environments). The interactional approach aligns with current empirical and methodological progress in social network analysis. Moreover, it has been argued that, within the network society, the notion of collective identity (Melucci, 1995) in the political field must be rethought as technologically mediated and interactive. We suggest that collective identities should be understood as recurrent, cohesive, and coordinated communicative interaction networks. We here propose that such identities can be depicted by: (a) mapping and filtering a relevant interaction network, (b) delimiting a set of communities, (c) determining the strongly connected component(s) of such communities (the core identity) in a directed graph, and (d) defining the identity audiences and sources within the community. This technical graph–theoretical characterization is explained and justified in detail through a toy model and applied to three empirical case studies to characterize political identities in party politics (communicative interaction in Twitter during the Spanish elections in 2018), contentious politics in confrontation (in Twitter during the Catalan strike for independence 2019), and the multitudinous identity of Spanish Indignados/15 social movement (in Facebook fan pages 2011). We discuss how the proposed definition is useful to delimit and characterize the internal structure of collective identities in technopolitical interaction networks, and we suggest how the proposed methods can be improved and complemented with other approaches. We finally draw the theoretical implications of understanding collective identities as emerging from interaction networks in a progressive platformization of social interactions in a digital world. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7422503/ /pubmed/32848986 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01549 Text en Copyright © 2020 Barandiaran, Calleja-López and Cozzo. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Barandiaran, Xabier E.
Calleja-López, Antonio
Cozzo, Emanuele
Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks
title Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks
title_full Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks
title_fullStr Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks
title_full_unstemmed Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks
title_short Defining Collective Identities in Technopolitical Interaction Networks
title_sort defining collective identities in technopolitical interaction networks
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422503/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32848986
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01549
work_keys_str_mv AT barandiaranxabiere definingcollectiveidentitiesintechnopoliticalinteractionnetworks
AT callejalopezantonio definingcollectiveidentitiesintechnopoliticalinteractionnetworks
AT cozzoemanuele definingcollectiveidentitiesintechnopoliticalinteractionnetworks