Cargando…

Evidence that informs feeding practices in very low birthweight and very preterm infants in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND: Optimal feeding of very low birthweight (VLBW <1500 g)/very preterm (gestation <32 weeks) infants in resource-limited settings in sub-Saharan Africa (sSA) is critical to reducing high mortality and poor outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To review evidence on feeding of VLBW/very preterm infants...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Akindolire, Abimbola, Talbert, Alison, Sinha, Ian, Embleton, Nicholas, Allen, Stephen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000724
_version_ 1783570043047510016
author Akindolire, Abimbola
Talbert, Alison
Sinha, Ian
Embleton, Nicholas
Allen, Stephen
author_facet Akindolire, Abimbola
Talbert, Alison
Sinha, Ian
Embleton, Nicholas
Allen, Stephen
author_sort Akindolire, Abimbola
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Optimal feeding of very low birthweight (VLBW <1500 g)/very preterm (gestation <32 weeks) infants in resource-limited settings in sub-Saharan Africa (sSA) is critical to reducing high mortality and poor outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To review evidence on feeding of VLBW/very preterm infants relevant to sSA. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, PubMed and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) from inception to July 2019 to identify reviews of randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of feeding VLBW/very preterm infants. We focused on interventions that are readily available in sSA. Primary outcomes were weight gain during hospital stay and time to achieve full enteral feeds (120 mL/kg/day). Secondary outcomes were growth, common morbidities, mortality, duration of hospital stay and cognitive development. Quality of evidence (QOE) was assessed using the Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR2). RESULTS: Eight systematic reviews were included. Higher feed volume of day 1 (80 mL/kg) reduced late-onset sepsis and time to full enteral feeds, and higher feed volume (up to 300 mL/kg/day) improved weight gain without adverse events (QOE: low–moderate). Rapid advancement of feeds (30–40 mL/kg/day) was not associated with harm. Breast milk fortification with energy and protein increased growth and with prebiotics increased growth and reduced duration of admission (QOE: low–very low) and did not result in harm. Evidence regarding feeding tube placement and continuous versus bolus feeds was insufficient to draw conclusions. We found no reviews meeting our selection criteria regarding when to start feeds, use of preterm formula, cup-and-spoon feeding or gravity versus push feeds and none of the reviews included trials from low-income countries of sSA. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base informing feeding of VLBW/very preterm babies in resource-limited settings in sSA is extremely limited. Pragmatic studies are needed to generate evidence to guide management and improve outcomes for these highly vulnerable infants. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019140204.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7422638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74226382020-08-19 Evidence that informs feeding practices in very low birthweight and very preterm infants in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of systematic reviews Akindolire, Abimbola Talbert, Alison Sinha, Ian Embleton, Nicholas Allen, Stephen BMJ Paediatr Open Neonatology BACKGROUND: Optimal feeding of very low birthweight (VLBW <1500 g)/very preterm (gestation <32 weeks) infants in resource-limited settings in sub-Saharan Africa (sSA) is critical to reducing high mortality and poor outcomes. OBJECTIVE: To review evidence on feeding of VLBW/very preterm infants relevant to sSA. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Embase, PubMed and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) from inception to July 2019 to identify reviews of randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of feeding VLBW/very preterm infants. We focused on interventions that are readily available in sSA. Primary outcomes were weight gain during hospital stay and time to achieve full enteral feeds (120 mL/kg/day). Secondary outcomes were growth, common morbidities, mortality, duration of hospital stay and cognitive development. Quality of evidence (QOE) was assessed using the Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR2). RESULTS: Eight systematic reviews were included. Higher feed volume of day 1 (80 mL/kg) reduced late-onset sepsis and time to full enteral feeds, and higher feed volume (up to 300 mL/kg/day) improved weight gain without adverse events (QOE: low–moderate). Rapid advancement of feeds (30–40 mL/kg/day) was not associated with harm. Breast milk fortification with energy and protein increased growth and with prebiotics increased growth and reduced duration of admission (QOE: low–very low) and did not result in harm. Evidence regarding feeding tube placement and continuous versus bolus feeds was insufficient to draw conclusions. We found no reviews meeting our selection criteria regarding when to start feeds, use of preterm formula, cup-and-spoon feeding or gravity versus push feeds and none of the reviews included trials from low-income countries of sSA. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence base informing feeding of VLBW/very preterm babies in resource-limited settings in sSA is extremely limited. Pragmatic studies are needed to generate evidence to guide management and improve outcomes for these highly vulnerable infants. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42019140204. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7422638/ /pubmed/32821859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000724 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Neonatology
Akindolire, Abimbola
Talbert, Alison
Sinha, Ian
Embleton, Nicholas
Allen, Stephen
Evidence that informs feeding practices in very low birthweight and very preterm infants in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of systematic reviews
title Evidence that informs feeding practices in very low birthweight and very preterm infants in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full Evidence that informs feeding practices in very low birthweight and very preterm infants in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of systematic reviews
title_fullStr Evidence that informs feeding practices in very low birthweight and very preterm infants in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of systematic reviews
title_full_unstemmed Evidence that informs feeding practices in very low birthweight and very preterm infants in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of systematic reviews
title_short Evidence that informs feeding practices in very low birthweight and very preterm infants in sub-Saharan Africa: an overview of systematic reviews
title_sort evidence that informs feeding practices in very low birthweight and very preterm infants in sub-saharan africa: an overview of systematic reviews
topic Neonatology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821859
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000724
work_keys_str_mv AT akindolireabimbola evidencethatinformsfeedingpracticesinverylowbirthweightandverypreterminfantsinsubsaharanafricaanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT talbertalison evidencethatinformsfeedingpracticesinverylowbirthweightandverypreterminfantsinsubsaharanafricaanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT sinhaian evidencethatinformsfeedingpracticesinverylowbirthweightandverypreterminfantsinsubsaharanafricaanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT embletonnicholas evidencethatinformsfeedingpracticesinverylowbirthweightandverypreterminfantsinsubsaharanafricaanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT allenstephen evidencethatinformsfeedingpracticesinverylowbirthweightandverypreterminfantsinsubsaharanafricaanoverviewofsystematicreviews
AT evidencethatinformsfeedingpracticesinverylowbirthweightandverypreterminfantsinsubsaharanafricaanoverviewofsystematicreviews