Cargando…
COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol
INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is putting an unprecedented strain on healthcare systems globally. The psychological impact on frontline doctors of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic is currently unknown. This longitudinal professional survey aims to understand the evolving and cumulative effect...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039851 |
_version_ | 1783570043816116224 |
---|---|
author | Roberts, Tom Daniels, Jo Hulme, William Horner, Daniel Lyttle, Mark David Samuel, Katie Graham, Blair Hirst, Robert Reynard, Charles Barrett, Michael Carlton, Edward |
author_facet | Roberts, Tom Daniels, Jo Hulme, William Horner, Daniel Lyttle, Mark David Samuel, Katie Graham, Blair Hirst, Robert Reynard, Charles Barrett, Michael Carlton, Edward |
author_sort | Roberts, Tom |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is putting an unprecedented strain on healthcare systems globally. The psychological impact on frontline doctors of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic is currently unknown. This longitudinal professional survey aims to understand the evolving and cumulative effects of working during the COVID-19 outbreak on the psychological well-being of doctors working in emergency departments (ED), intensive care units (ICU) and anaesthetics during the pandemic. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a longitudinal questionnaire-based study with three predefined time points spanning the acceleration, peak and deceleration phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary outcomes are psychological distress and post-trauma stress as measured by the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) and Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R). Data related to personal and professional characteristics will also be collected. Questionnaires will be administered prospectively to all doctors working in ED, ICU and anaesthetics in the UK and Ireland via existing research networks during the sampling period. Data from the questionnaires will be analysed to assess the prevalence and degree of psychological distress and trauma, and the nature of the relationship between personal and professional characteristics and the primary outcomes. Data will be described, analysed and disseminated at each time point; however, the primary endpoint will be psychological distress and trauma at the final time point. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Bath, UK (ref: 4421), and Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Ethics Committee. Regulatory approval from the Health Regulation Authority (UK), Health and Care Research Wales (IRAS: 281944). This study is limited by the fact that it focuses on doctors only and is survey based without further qualitative interviews of participants. It is expected this study will provide clear evidence of the psychological impact of COVID-19 on doctors and will allow present and future planning to mitigate against any psychological impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10666798. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7422647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74226472020-08-19 COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol Roberts, Tom Daniels, Jo Hulme, William Horner, Daniel Lyttle, Mark David Samuel, Katie Graham, Blair Hirst, Robert Reynard, Charles Barrett, Michael Carlton, Edward BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is putting an unprecedented strain on healthcare systems globally. The psychological impact on frontline doctors of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic is currently unknown. This longitudinal professional survey aims to understand the evolving and cumulative effects of working during the COVID-19 outbreak on the psychological well-being of doctors working in emergency departments (ED), intensive care units (ICU) and anaesthetics during the pandemic. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a longitudinal questionnaire-based study with three predefined time points spanning the acceleration, peak and deceleration phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary outcomes are psychological distress and post-trauma stress as measured by the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) and Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R). Data related to personal and professional characteristics will also be collected. Questionnaires will be administered prospectively to all doctors working in ED, ICU and anaesthetics in the UK and Ireland via existing research networks during the sampling period. Data from the questionnaires will be analysed to assess the prevalence and degree of psychological distress and trauma, and the nature of the relationship between personal and professional characteristics and the primary outcomes. Data will be described, analysed and disseminated at each time point; however, the primary endpoint will be psychological distress and trauma at the final time point. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Bath, UK (ref: 4421), and Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Ethics Committee. Regulatory approval from the Health Regulation Authority (UK), Health and Care Research Wales (IRAS: 281944). This study is limited by the fact that it focuses on doctors only and is survey based without further qualitative interviews of participants. It is expected this study will provide clear evidence of the psychological impact of COVID-19 on doctors and will allow present and future planning to mitigate against any psychological impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10666798. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7422647/ /pubmed/32788191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039851 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Roberts, Tom Daniels, Jo Hulme, William Horner, Daniel Lyttle, Mark David Samuel, Katie Graham, Blair Hirst, Robert Reynard, Charles Barrett, Michael Carlton, Edward COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol |
title | COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol |
title_full | COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol |
title_fullStr | COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol |
title_short | COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol |
title_sort | covid-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the uk and ireland: study protocol |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039851 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT robertstom covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol AT danielsjo covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol AT hulmewilliam covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol AT hornerdaniel covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol AT lyttlemarkdavid covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol AT samuelkatie covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol AT grahamblair covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol AT hirstrobert covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol AT reynardcharles covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol AT barrettmichael covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol AT carltonedward covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol |