Cargando…

COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is putting an unprecedented strain on healthcare systems globally. The psychological impact on frontline doctors of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic is currently unknown. This longitudinal professional survey aims to understand the evolving and cumulative effect...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Roberts, Tom, Daniels, Jo, Hulme, William, Horner, Daniel, Lyttle, Mark David, Samuel, Katie, Graham, Blair, Hirst, Robert, Reynard, Charles, Barrett, Michael, Carlton, Edward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039851
_version_ 1783570043816116224
author Roberts, Tom
Daniels, Jo
Hulme, William
Horner, Daniel
Lyttle, Mark David
Samuel, Katie
Graham, Blair
Hirst, Robert
Reynard, Charles
Barrett, Michael
Carlton, Edward
author_facet Roberts, Tom
Daniels, Jo
Hulme, William
Horner, Daniel
Lyttle, Mark David
Samuel, Katie
Graham, Blair
Hirst, Robert
Reynard, Charles
Barrett, Michael
Carlton, Edward
author_sort Roberts, Tom
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is putting an unprecedented strain on healthcare systems globally. The psychological impact on frontline doctors of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic is currently unknown. This longitudinal professional survey aims to understand the evolving and cumulative effects of working during the COVID-19 outbreak on the psychological well-being of doctors working in emergency departments (ED), intensive care units (ICU) and anaesthetics during the pandemic. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a longitudinal questionnaire-based study with three predefined time points spanning the acceleration, peak and deceleration phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary outcomes are psychological distress and post-trauma stress as measured by the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) and Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R). Data related to personal and professional characteristics will also be collected. Questionnaires will be administered prospectively to all doctors working in ED, ICU and anaesthetics in the UK and Ireland via existing research networks during the sampling period. Data from the questionnaires will be analysed to assess the prevalence and degree of psychological distress and trauma, and the nature of the relationship between personal and professional characteristics and the primary outcomes. Data will be described, analysed and disseminated at each time point; however, the primary endpoint will be psychological distress and trauma at the final time point. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Bath, UK (ref: 4421), and Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Ethics Committee. Regulatory approval from the Health Regulation Authority (UK), Health and Care Research Wales (IRAS: 281944). This study is limited by the fact that it focuses on doctors only and is survey based without further qualitative interviews of participants. It is expected this study will provide clear evidence of the psychological impact of COVID-19 on doctors and will allow present and future planning to mitigate against any psychological impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10666798.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7422647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74226472020-08-19 COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol Roberts, Tom Daniels, Jo Hulme, William Horner, Daniel Lyttle, Mark David Samuel, Katie Graham, Blair Hirst, Robert Reynard, Charles Barrett, Michael Carlton, Edward BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic is putting an unprecedented strain on healthcare systems globally. The psychological impact on frontline doctors of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic is currently unknown. This longitudinal professional survey aims to understand the evolving and cumulative effects of working during the COVID-19 outbreak on the psychological well-being of doctors working in emergency departments (ED), intensive care units (ICU) and anaesthetics during the pandemic. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This study is a longitudinal questionnaire-based study with three predefined time points spanning the acceleration, peak and deceleration phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. The primary outcomes are psychological distress and post-trauma stress as measured by the General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12) and Impact of Events Scale-Revised (IES-R). Data related to personal and professional characteristics will also be collected. Questionnaires will be administered prospectively to all doctors working in ED, ICU and anaesthetics in the UK and Ireland via existing research networks during the sampling period. Data from the questionnaires will be analysed to assess the prevalence and degree of psychological distress and trauma, and the nature of the relationship between personal and professional characteristics and the primary outcomes. Data will be described, analysed and disseminated at each time point; however, the primary endpoint will be psychological distress and trauma at the final time point. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was obtained from the University of Bath, UK (ref: 4421), and Children’s Health Ireland at Crumlin, Ethics Committee. Regulatory approval from the Health Regulation Authority (UK), Health and Care Research Wales (IRAS: 281944). This study is limited by the fact that it focuses on doctors only and is survey based without further qualitative interviews of participants. It is expected this study will provide clear evidence of the psychological impact of COVID-19 on doctors and will allow present and future planning to mitigate against any psychological impact. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN10666798. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7422647/ /pubmed/32788191 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039851 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Mental Health
Roberts, Tom
Daniels, Jo
Hulme, William
Horner, Daniel
Lyttle, Mark David
Samuel, Katie
Graham, Blair
Hirst, Robert
Reynard, Charles
Barrett, Michael
Carlton, Edward
COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol
title COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol
title_full COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol
title_fullStr COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol
title_full_unstemmed COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol
title_short COVID-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the UK and Ireland: study protocol
title_sort covid-19 emergency response assessment study: a prospective longitudinal survey of frontline doctors in the uk and ireland: study protocol
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788191
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039851
work_keys_str_mv AT robertstom covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol
AT danielsjo covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol
AT hulmewilliam covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol
AT hornerdaniel covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol
AT lyttlemarkdavid covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol
AT samuelkatie covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol
AT grahamblair covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol
AT hirstrobert covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol
AT reynardcharles covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol
AT barrettmichael covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol
AT carltonedward covid19emergencyresponseassessmentstudyaprospectivelongitudinalsurveyoffrontlinedoctorsintheukandirelandstudyprotocol