Cargando…

Implementation of vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section

INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections following caesarean section are associated with significant morbidity. Vaginal preparation is the cleansing of the vaginal epithelium with an antibacterial solution to reduce the bacterial load and therefore reduce ascending genital tract infection. It is recom...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jakes, Adam D, Bell, Annie, Chiwera, Lilian, Lloyd, Jilly
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000976
_version_ 1783570044064628736
author Jakes, Adam D
Bell, Annie
Chiwera, Lilian
Lloyd, Jilly
author_facet Jakes, Adam D
Bell, Annie
Chiwera, Lilian
Lloyd, Jilly
author_sort Jakes, Adam D
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections following caesarean section are associated with significant morbidity. Vaginal preparation is the cleansing of the vaginal epithelium with an antibacterial solution to reduce the bacterial load and therefore reduce ascending genital tract infection. It is recommended by the WHO and a Cochrane review in 2018 concluded that vaginal preparation immediately before caesarean section probably reduces the rates of postoperative endometritis. OBJECTIVE: To implement vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and reduce rates of deep surgical site infections. METHODS: The protocol (included within the appendices) for vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section was developed after reviewing the available evidence. Two vaginal preparation champions, a midwife and a scrub nurse, were selected to help promote and assist in the implementation. The first implementation cycle included elective and category II and III caesarean sections. To ensure acceptability, 20 women were asked to complete a questionnaire following vaginal preparation. Once the intervention was being performed in >85% of eligible women, the inclusion criteria was expanded to include category I caesarean sections. RESULTS: Twelve months following implementation, vaginal preparation was still being performed in 89% of eligible women. The deep surgical site infection rate is now the lowest recorded in the last 6 years. Vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section was acceptable to pregnant women and no adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section has been successfully implemented at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. This simple, cheap intervention, performed with readily available materials, is still being performed in a high number of caesarean sections 12 months post-implementation. It has resulted in a reduction in deep surgical site infections. Involvement of key stakeholders and the recruitment of vaginal preparation champions were key to success.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7422648
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74226482020-08-19 Implementation of vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section Jakes, Adam D Bell, Annie Chiwera, Lilian Lloyd, Jilly BMJ Open Qual Quality Improvement Report INTRODUCTION: Surgical site infections following caesarean section are associated with significant morbidity. Vaginal preparation is the cleansing of the vaginal epithelium with an antibacterial solution to reduce the bacterial load and therefore reduce ascending genital tract infection. It is recommended by the WHO and a Cochrane review in 2018 concluded that vaginal preparation immediately before caesarean section probably reduces the rates of postoperative endometritis. OBJECTIVE: To implement vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust and reduce rates of deep surgical site infections. METHODS: The protocol (included within the appendices) for vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section was developed after reviewing the available evidence. Two vaginal preparation champions, a midwife and a scrub nurse, were selected to help promote and assist in the implementation. The first implementation cycle included elective and category II and III caesarean sections. To ensure acceptability, 20 women were asked to complete a questionnaire following vaginal preparation. Once the intervention was being performed in >85% of eligible women, the inclusion criteria was expanded to include category I caesarean sections. RESULTS: Twelve months following implementation, vaginal preparation was still being performed in 89% of eligible women. The deep surgical site infection rate is now the lowest recorded in the last 6 years. Vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section was acceptable to pregnant women and no adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section has been successfully implemented at Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. This simple, cheap intervention, performed with readily available materials, is still being performed in a high number of caesarean sections 12 months post-implementation. It has resulted in a reduction in deep surgical site infections. Involvement of key stakeholders and the recruitment of vaginal preparation champions were key to success. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-08-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7422648/ /pubmed/32788171 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000976 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Quality Improvement Report
Jakes, Adam D
Bell, Annie
Chiwera, Lilian
Lloyd, Jilly
Implementation of vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section
title Implementation of vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section
title_full Implementation of vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section
title_fullStr Implementation of vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section
title_full_unstemmed Implementation of vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section
title_short Implementation of vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section
title_sort implementation of vaginal preparation prior to caesarean section
topic Quality Improvement Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422648/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788171
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2020-000976
work_keys_str_mv AT jakesadamd implementationofvaginalpreparationpriortocaesareansection
AT bellannie implementationofvaginalpreparationpriortocaesareansection
AT chiweralilian implementationofvaginalpreparationpriortocaesareansection
AT lloydjilly implementationofvaginalpreparationpriortocaesareansection