Cargando…
Comparison of Current Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Methods in Imaging Retinal Hemangioblastomas
PURPOSE: To compare spectral-domain (SD) and swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for imaging retinal capillary hemangioblastomas (RCHs) in von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHLD). METHODS: Prospective single-center cross-sectional study. Tumor size (TS) of perfused RCHs was as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.8.12 |
Sumario: | PURPOSE: To compare spectral-domain (SD) and swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for imaging retinal capillary hemangioblastomas (RCHs) in von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHLD). METHODS: Prospective single-center cross-sectional study. Tumor size (TS) of perfused RCHs was assessed clinically in relation to the optic disc size. For both technologies, SD-OCTA and SS-OCTA, corresponding images with a scan size of 3 × 3 mm(2) and 6 × 6 mm(2), respectively, were overlaid according to the set of marker positions to determine the TS. RESULTS: From 200 patients with VHLD, 48 patients showed 84 RCHs. SD-OCTA images of 39 RCHs (46.4%) and SS-OCTA images of 48 RCHs (57.2%) were suitable for analysis. The average in OCTA-measured TS of 1.60 ± 2.58 mm(2) (range, 0.01–10.43) was congruent to the clinically assessed TS in 81.3% of cases (r = 0.86, P < 0.0001). TS measured in SD-OCTA compared to SS-OCTA showed similar values and a high correlation (all P < 0.0001). Nevertheless, despite the similarities, a slight trend in SS-OCTA was observed whereby with increasing TS, an elevated TS was detected compared to SD-OCTA (3 × 3-mm(2) scans: mean difference of 0.03 ± 0.04 mm(2), 6 × 6-mm(2) scans: 0.08 ± 0.19 mm(2)). However, within the same imaging technology method, TS values almost did not differ (SD-OCTA: mean difference of 0.01 ± 0.02 mm(2), SS-OCTA: 0.001 ± 0.01 mm(2)). CONCLUSIONS: OCTA may serve as an additional tool for diagnosis and monitoring of RCHs. Nevertheless, due to the differences between the technologies, the values cannot be used interchangeably. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: SD-OCTA and SS-OCTA are suitable to detect and monitor RCHs and provide a more detailed assessment about the TS than this is clinically possible. |
---|