Cargando…
Comparison of Current Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Methods in Imaging Retinal Hemangioblastomas
PURPOSE: To compare spectral-domain (SD) and swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for imaging retinal capillary hemangioblastomas (RCHs) in von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHLD). METHODS: Prospective single-center cross-sectional study. Tumor size (TS) of perfused RCHs was as...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.8.12 |
_version_ | 1783570064600989696 |
---|---|
author | Reich, Michael Glatz, Andreas Boehringer, Daniel Evers, Charlotte Daniel, Moritz Bucher, Felicitas Ludwig, Franziska Nuessle, Simone Lagrèze, Wolf A. Maloca, Peter M. Lange, Clemens Reinhard, Thomas Agostini, Hansjuergen Lang, Stefan J. |
author_facet | Reich, Michael Glatz, Andreas Boehringer, Daniel Evers, Charlotte Daniel, Moritz Bucher, Felicitas Ludwig, Franziska Nuessle, Simone Lagrèze, Wolf A. Maloca, Peter M. Lange, Clemens Reinhard, Thomas Agostini, Hansjuergen Lang, Stefan J. |
author_sort | Reich, Michael |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare spectral-domain (SD) and swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for imaging retinal capillary hemangioblastomas (RCHs) in von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHLD). METHODS: Prospective single-center cross-sectional study. Tumor size (TS) of perfused RCHs was assessed clinically in relation to the optic disc size. For both technologies, SD-OCTA and SS-OCTA, corresponding images with a scan size of 3 × 3 mm(2) and 6 × 6 mm(2), respectively, were overlaid according to the set of marker positions to determine the TS. RESULTS: From 200 patients with VHLD, 48 patients showed 84 RCHs. SD-OCTA images of 39 RCHs (46.4%) and SS-OCTA images of 48 RCHs (57.2%) were suitable for analysis. The average in OCTA-measured TS of 1.60 ± 2.58 mm(2) (range, 0.01–10.43) was congruent to the clinically assessed TS in 81.3% of cases (r = 0.86, P < 0.0001). TS measured in SD-OCTA compared to SS-OCTA showed similar values and a high correlation (all P < 0.0001). Nevertheless, despite the similarities, a slight trend in SS-OCTA was observed whereby with increasing TS, an elevated TS was detected compared to SD-OCTA (3 × 3-mm(2) scans: mean difference of 0.03 ± 0.04 mm(2), 6 × 6-mm(2) scans: 0.08 ± 0.19 mm(2)). However, within the same imaging technology method, TS values almost did not differ (SD-OCTA: mean difference of 0.01 ± 0.02 mm(2), SS-OCTA: 0.001 ± 0.01 mm(2)). CONCLUSIONS: OCTA may serve as an additional tool for diagnosis and monitoring of RCHs. Nevertheless, due to the differences between the technologies, the values cannot be used interchangeably. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: SD-OCTA and SS-OCTA are suitable to detect and monitor RCHs and provide a more detailed assessment about the TS than this is clinically possible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7422766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74227662020-08-26 Comparison of Current Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Methods in Imaging Retinal Hemangioblastomas Reich, Michael Glatz, Andreas Boehringer, Daniel Evers, Charlotte Daniel, Moritz Bucher, Felicitas Ludwig, Franziska Nuessle, Simone Lagrèze, Wolf A. Maloca, Peter M. Lange, Clemens Reinhard, Thomas Agostini, Hansjuergen Lang, Stefan J. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To compare spectral-domain (SD) and swept-source (SS) optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA) for imaging retinal capillary hemangioblastomas (RCHs) in von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHLD). METHODS: Prospective single-center cross-sectional study. Tumor size (TS) of perfused RCHs was assessed clinically in relation to the optic disc size. For both technologies, SD-OCTA and SS-OCTA, corresponding images with a scan size of 3 × 3 mm(2) and 6 × 6 mm(2), respectively, were overlaid according to the set of marker positions to determine the TS. RESULTS: From 200 patients with VHLD, 48 patients showed 84 RCHs. SD-OCTA images of 39 RCHs (46.4%) and SS-OCTA images of 48 RCHs (57.2%) were suitable for analysis. The average in OCTA-measured TS of 1.60 ± 2.58 mm(2) (range, 0.01–10.43) was congruent to the clinically assessed TS in 81.3% of cases (r = 0.86, P < 0.0001). TS measured in SD-OCTA compared to SS-OCTA showed similar values and a high correlation (all P < 0.0001). Nevertheless, despite the similarities, a slight trend in SS-OCTA was observed whereby with increasing TS, an elevated TS was detected compared to SD-OCTA (3 × 3-mm(2) scans: mean difference of 0.03 ± 0.04 mm(2), 6 × 6-mm(2) scans: 0.08 ± 0.19 mm(2)). However, within the same imaging technology method, TS values almost did not differ (SD-OCTA: mean difference of 0.01 ± 0.02 mm(2), SS-OCTA: 0.001 ± 0.01 mm(2)). CONCLUSIONS: OCTA may serve as an additional tool for diagnosis and monitoring of RCHs. Nevertheless, due to the differences between the technologies, the values cannot be used interchangeably. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: SD-OCTA and SS-OCTA are suitable to detect and monitor RCHs and provide a more detailed assessment about the TS than this is clinically possible. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7422766/ /pubmed/32855859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.8.12 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Article Reich, Michael Glatz, Andreas Boehringer, Daniel Evers, Charlotte Daniel, Moritz Bucher, Felicitas Ludwig, Franziska Nuessle, Simone Lagrèze, Wolf A. Maloca, Peter M. Lange, Clemens Reinhard, Thomas Agostini, Hansjuergen Lang, Stefan J. Comparison of Current Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Methods in Imaging Retinal Hemangioblastomas |
title | Comparison of Current Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Methods in Imaging Retinal Hemangioblastomas |
title_full | Comparison of Current Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Methods in Imaging Retinal Hemangioblastomas |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Current Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Methods in Imaging Retinal Hemangioblastomas |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Current Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Methods in Imaging Retinal Hemangioblastomas |
title_short | Comparison of Current Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Methods in Imaging Retinal Hemangioblastomas |
title_sort | comparison of current optical coherence tomography angiography methods in imaging retinal hemangioblastomas |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.8.12 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reichmichael comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT glatzandreas comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT boehringerdaniel comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT everscharlotte comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT danielmoritz comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT bucherfelicitas comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT ludwigfranziska comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT nuesslesimone comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT lagrezewolfa comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT malocapeterm comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT langeclemens comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT reinhardthomas comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT agostinihansjuergen comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas AT langstefanj comparisonofcurrentopticalcoherencetomographyangiographymethodsinimagingretinalhemangioblastomas |