Cargando…

Effect of Disease Progression on the PRL Location in Patients With Bilateral Central Vision Loss

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of disease progression on the monocular preferred retinal locus (PRL) of the better eye (BE) and worse eye (WE) of patients with central vision loss. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with bilateral macular diseases were included. The monocular PRL was recorded for each...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tarita-Nistor, Luminita, Mandelcorn, Mark S., Mandelcorn, Efrem D., Markowitz, Samuel N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.8.47
_version_ 1783570085447729152
author Tarita-Nistor, Luminita
Mandelcorn, Mark S.
Mandelcorn, Efrem D.
Markowitz, Samuel N.
author_facet Tarita-Nistor, Luminita
Mandelcorn, Mark S.
Mandelcorn, Efrem D.
Markowitz, Samuel N.
author_sort Tarita-Nistor, Luminita
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of disease progression on the monocular preferred retinal locus (PRL) of the better eye (BE) and worse eye (WE) of patients with central vision loss. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with bilateral macular diseases were included. The monocular PRL was recorded for each eye (N = 102 eyes) with the MP-1 microperimeter in two visits that were 458 ± 249 days apart. For each eye and visit, the PRL distance from the former fovea, polar angle, and scotoma size were measured. The change in PRL location from visit 1 to visit 2 was evaluated with the differential map analysis. RESULTS: Scotoma size increased significantly in both eyes. The PRL distance from the former fovea increased significantly from visit 1 to visit 2 in the BE, but not in the WE. The polar angle was relatively stable in both visits for the BE. The change in PRL location in the BE was predicted only by the PRL distance from the former fovea in visits 1 and 2, but not by polar angle or scotoma size. For the WE, the change in PRL location depended on the change in PRL location in the BE, rather than on measurements made on that eye. CONCLUSIONS: Disease progression affects monocular PRL location differently in the 2 eyes. The results suggest a recalibration of the oculomotor system with its reference at the PRL from the BE. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: These findings are important for deciding the course of treatment and/or for developing rehabilitation techniques focusing on PRL relocation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7422864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74228642020-08-26 Effect of Disease Progression on the PRL Location in Patients With Bilateral Central Vision Loss Tarita-Nistor, Luminita Mandelcorn, Mark S. Mandelcorn, Efrem D. Markowitz, Samuel N. Transl Vis Sci Technol Article PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of disease progression on the monocular preferred retinal locus (PRL) of the better eye (BE) and worse eye (WE) of patients with central vision loss. METHODS: Fifty-one patients with bilateral macular diseases were included. The monocular PRL was recorded for each eye (N = 102 eyes) with the MP-1 microperimeter in two visits that were 458 ± 249 days apart. For each eye and visit, the PRL distance from the former fovea, polar angle, and scotoma size were measured. The change in PRL location from visit 1 to visit 2 was evaluated with the differential map analysis. RESULTS: Scotoma size increased significantly in both eyes. The PRL distance from the former fovea increased significantly from visit 1 to visit 2 in the BE, but not in the WE. The polar angle was relatively stable in both visits for the BE. The change in PRL location in the BE was predicted only by the PRL distance from the former fovea in visits 1 and 2, but not by polar angle or scotoma size. For the WE, the change in PRL location depended on the change in PRL location in the BE, rather than on measurements made on that eye. CONCLUSIONS: Disease progression affects monocular PRL location differently in the 2 eyes. The results suggest a recalibration of the oculomotor system with its reference at the PRL from the BE. TRANSLATIONAL RELEVANCE: These findings are important for deciding the course of treatment and/or for developing rehabilitation techniques focusing on PRL relocation. The Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology 2020-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7422864/ /pubmed/32855893 http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.8.47 Text en Copyright 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Article
Tarita-Nistor, Luminita
Mandelcorn, Mark S.
Mandelcorn, Efrem D.
Markowitz, Samuel N.
Effect of Disease Progression on the PRL Location in Patients With Bilateral Central Vision Loss
title Effect of Disease Progression on the PRL Location in Patients With Bilateral Central Vision Loss
title_full Effect of Disease Progression on the PRL Location in Patients With Bilateral Central Vision Loss
title_fullStr Effect of Disease Progression on the PRL Location in Patients With Bilateral Central Vision Loss
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Disease Progression on the PRL Location in Patients With Bilateral Central Vision Loss
title_short Effect of Disease Progression on the PRL Location in Patients With Bilateral Central Vision Loss
title_sort effect of disease progression on the prl location in patients with bilateral central vision loss
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855893
http://dx.doi.org/10.1167/tvst.9.8.47
work_keys_str_mv AT taritanistorluminita effectofdiseaseprogressionontheprllocationinpatientswithbilateralcentralvisionloss
AT mandelcornmarks effectofdiseaseprogressionontheprllocationinpatientswithbilateralcentralvisionloss
AT mandelcornefremd effectofdiseaseprogressionontheprllocationinpatientswithbilateralcentralvisionloss
AT markowitzsamueln effectofdiseaseprogressionontheprllocationinpatientswithbilateralcentralvisionloss