Cargando…
Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences
Data were collected from 39 newborn screening (NBS) programs to provide insight into the time and factors required for implementing statewide screening for Pompe, Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I), adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), and Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). Newborn screening program readiness...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33073030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns6020035 |
_version_ | 1783570098689146880 |
---|---|
author | Kellar-Guenther, Yvonne McKasson, Sarah Hale, Kshea Singh, Sikha Sontag, Marci K. Ojodu, Jelili |
author_facet | Kellar-Guenther, Yvonne McKasson, Sarah Hale, Kshea Singh, Sikha Sontag, Marci K. Ojodu, Jelili |
author_sort | Kellar-Guenther, Yvonne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Data were collected from 39 newborn screening (NBS) programs to provide insight into the time and factors required for implementing statewide screening for Pompe, Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I), adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), and Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). Newborn screening program readiness to screen statewide for a condition was assessed using four phases: (1) approval to screen; (2) laboratory, follow-up, and information technology capabilities; (3) education; and (4) implementation of statewide newborn screening. Seventeen states (43.6%) reached statewide implementation for at least one new disorder. Those states reported that it took 28 months to implement statewide screening for Pompe and MPS I, 30.5 months for ALD, and 20 months for SMA. Using survival curve analysis to account for states still in progress, the estimated median time to statewide screening increased to 75 months for Pompe and 66 months for MPS I. When looking at how long each readiness component took to complete, laboratory readiness was one of the lengthier processes, taking about 39 months. Collaboration with other NBS programs and hiring were the most frequently mentioned facilitators to implementing newborn screening. Staffing or inability to hire both laboratory and follow-up staff was the most frequently mentioned barrier. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7422992 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74229922020-10-15 Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences Kellar-Guenther, Yvonne McKasson, Sarah Hale, Kshea Singh, Sikha Sontag, Marci K. Ojodu, Jelili Int J Neonatal Screen Article Data were collected from 39 newborn screening (NBS) programs to provide insight into the time and factors required for implementing statewide screening for Pompe, Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I), adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), and Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). Newborn screening program readiness to screen statewide for a condition was assessed using four phases: (1) approval to screen; (2) laboratory, follow-up, and information technology capabilities; (3) education; and (4) implementation of statewide newborn screening. Seventeen states (43.6%) reached statewide implementation for at least one new disorder. Those states reported that it took 28 months to implement statewide screening for Pompe and MPS I, 30.5 months for ALD, and 20 months for SMA. Using survival curve analysis to account for states still in progress, the estimated median time to statewide screening increased to 75 months for Pompe and 66 months for MPS I. When looking at how long each readiness component took to complete, laboratory readiness was one of the lengthier processes, taking about 39 months. Collaboration with other NBS programs and hiring were the most frequently mentioned facilitators to implementing newborn screening. Staffing or inability to hire both laboratory and follow-up staff was the most frequently mentioned barrier. MDPI 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7422992/ /pubmed/33073030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns6020035 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kellar-Guenther, Yvonne McKasson, Sarah Hale, Kshea Singh, Sikha Sontag, Marci K. Ojodu, Jelili Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences |
title | Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences |
title_full | Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences |
title_fullStr | Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences |
title_short | Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences |
title_sort | implementing statewide newborn screening for new disorders: u.s. program experiences |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422992/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33073030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns6020035 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kellarguentheryvonne implementingstatewidenewbornscreeningfornewdisordersusprogramexperiences AT mckassonsarah implementingstatewidenewbornscreeningfornewdisordersusprogramexperiences AT halekshea implementingstatewidenewbornscreeningfornewdisordersusprogramexperiences AT singhsikha implementingstatewidenewbornscreeningfornewdisordersusprogramexperiences AT sontagmarcik implementingstatewidenewbornscreeningfornewdisordersusprogramexperiences AT ojodujelili implementingstatewidenewbornscreeningfornewdisordersusprogramexperiences |