Cargando…

Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences

Data were collected from 39 newborn screening (NBS) programs to provide insight into the time and factors required for implementing statewide screening for Pompe, Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I), adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), and Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). Newborn screening program readiness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kellar-Guenther, Yvonne, McKasson, Sarah, Hale, Kshea, Singh, Sikha, Sontag, Marci K., Ojodu, Jelili
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33073030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns6020035
_version_ 1783570098689146880
author Kellar-Guenther, Yvonne
McKasson, Sarah
Hale, Kshea
Singh, Sikha
Sontag, Marci K.
Ojodu, Jelili
author_facet Kellar-Guenther, Yvonne
McKasson, Sarah
Hale, Kshea
Singh, Sikha
Sontag, Marci K.
Ojodu, Jelili
author_sort Kellar-Guenther, Yvonne
collection PubMed
description Data were collected from 39 newborn screening (NBS) programs to provide insight into the time and factors required for implementing statewide screening for Pompe, Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I), adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), and Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). Newborn screening program readiness to screen statewide for a condition was assessed using four phases: (1) approval to screen; (2) laboratory, follow-up, and information technology capabilities; (3) education; and (4) implementation of statewide newborn screening. Seventeen states (43.6%) reached statewide implementation for at least one new disorder. Those states reported that it took 28 months to implement statewide screening for Pompe and MPS I, 30.5 months for ALD, and 20 months for SMA. Using survival curve analysis to account for states still in progress, the estimated median time to statewide screening increased to 75 months for Pompe and 66 months for MPS I. When looking at how long each readiness component took to complete, laboratory readiness was one of the lengthier processes, taking about 39 months. Collaboration with other NBS programs and hiring were the most frequently mentioned facilitators to implementing newborn screening. Staffing or inability to hire both laboratory and follow-up staff was the most frequently mentioned barrier.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7422992
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74229922020-10-15 Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences Kellar-Guenther, Yvonne McKasson, Sarah Hale, Kshea Singh, Sikha Sontag, Marci K. Ojodu, Jelili Int J Neonatal Screen Article Data were collected from 39 newborn screening (NBS) programs to provide insight into the time and factors required for implementing statewide screening for Pompe, Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I), adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), and Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA). Newborn screening program readiness to screen statewide for a condition was assessed using four phases: (1) approval to screen; (2) laboratory, follow-up, and information technology capabilities; (3) education; and (4) implementation of statewide newborn screening. Seventeen states (43.6%) reached statewide implementation for at least one new disorder. Those states reported that it took 28 months to implement statewide screening for Pompe and MPS I, 30.5 months for ALD, and 20 months for SMA. Using survival curve analysis to account for states still in progress, the estimated median time to statewide screening increased to 75 months for Pompe and 66 months for MPS I. When looking at how long each readiness component took to complete, laboratory readiness was one of the lengthier processes, taking about 39 months. Collaboration with other NBS programs and hiring were the most frequently mentioned facilitators to implementing newborn screening. Staffing or inability to hire both laboratory and follow-up staff was the most frequently mentioned barrier. MDPI 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7422992/ /pubmed/33073030 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns6020035 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kellar-Guenther, Yvonne
McKasson, Sarah
Hale, Kshea
Singh, Sikha
Sontag, Marci K.
Ojodu, Jelili
Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences
title Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences
title_full Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences
title_fullStr Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences
title_full_unstemmed Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences
title_short Implementing Statewide Newborn Screening for New Disorders: U.S. Program Experiences
title_sort implementing statewide newborn screening for new disorders: u.s. program experiences
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7422992/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33073030
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijns6020035
work_keys_str_mv AT kellarguentheryvonne implementingstatewidenewbornscreeningfornewdisordersusprogramexperiences
AT mckassonsarah implementingstatewidenewbornscreeningfornewdisordersusprogramexperiences
AT halekshea implementingstatewidenewbornscreeningfornewdisordersusprogramexperiences
AT singhsikha implementingstatewidenewbornscreeningfornewdisordersusprogramexperiences
AT sontagmarcik implementingstatewidenewbornscreeningfornewdisordersusprogramexperiences
AT ojodujelili implementingstatewidenewbornscreeningfornewdisordersusprogramexperiences