Cargando…

Who goes there? Social surveillance as a response to intergroup conflict in a primitive termite

Intergroup conflict has been suggested as a major force shaping the evolution of social behaviour in animal groups. A long-standing hypothesis is that groups at risk of attack by rivals should become more socially cohesive, to increase resilience or protect against future attack. However, it is usua...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thompson, Faye J., Hunt, Kingsley L., Wright, Kallum, Rosengaus, Rebeca B., Cole, Erin L., Birch, Graham, Maune, Avery L., Cant, Michael A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423038/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0131
_version_ 1783570104862113792
author Thompson, Faye J.
Hunt, Kingsley L.
Wright, Kallum
Rosengaus, Rebeca B.
Cole, Erin L.
Birch, Graham
Maune, Avery L.
Cant, Michael A.
author_facet Thompson, Faye J.
Hunt, Kingsley L.
Wright, Kallum
Rosengaus, Rebeca B.
Cole, Erin L.
Birch, Graham
Maune, Avery L.
Cant, Michael A.
author_sort Thompson, Faye J.
collection PubMed
description Intergroup conflict has been suggested as a major force shaping the evolution of social behaviour in animal groups. A long-standing hypothesis is that groups at risk of attack by rivals should become more socially cohesive, to increase resilience or protect against future attack. However, it is usually unclear how cohesive behaviours (such as grooming or social contacts) function in intergroup conflict. We performed an experiment in which we exposed young colonies of the dampwood termite, Zootermopsis angusticollis, to a rival colony while preventing physical combat with a permeable barrier. We measured social contacts, allogrooming and trophallaxis before, during and after exposure. Termites showed elevated rates of social contacts during exposure to a rival compared to the pre-exposure phase, but rates returned to pre-exposure levels after colonies were separated for 9 days. There was evidence of a delayed effect of conflict on worker trophallaxis. We suggest that social contacts during intergroup conflict function as a form of social surveillance, to check individual identity and assess colony resource holding potential. Intergroup conflict may increase social cohesion in both the short and the long term, improving the effectiveness of groups in competition.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7423038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74230382020-08-14 Who goes there? Social surveillance as a response to intergroup conflict in a primitive termite Thompson, Faye J. Hunt, Kingsley L. Wright, Kallum Rosengaus, Rebeca B. Cole, Erin L. Birch, Graham Maune, Avery L. Cant, Michael A. Biol Lett Animal Behaviour Intergroup conflict has been suggested as a major force shaping the evolution of social behaviour in animal groups. A long-standing hypothesis is that groups at risk of attack by rivals should become more socially cohesive, to increase resilience or protect against future attack. However, it is usually unclear how cohesive behaviours (such as grooming or social contacts) function in intergroup conflict. We performed an experiment in which we exposed young colonies of the dampwood termite, Zootermopsis angusticollis, to a rival colony while preventing physical combat with a permeable barrier. We measured social contacts, allogrooming and trophallaxis before, during and after exposure. Termites showed elevated rates of social contacts during exposure to a rival compared to the pre-exposure phase, but rates returned to pre-exposure levels after colonies were separated for 9 days. There was evidence of a delayed effect of conflict on worker trophallaxis. We suggest that social contacts during intergroup conflict function as a form of social surveillance, to check individual identity and assess colony resource holding potential. Intergroup conflict may increase social cohesion in both the short and the long term, improving the effectiveness of groups in competition. The Royal Society 2020-07 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7423038/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0131 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Animal Behaviour
Thompson, Faye J.
Hunt, Kingsley L.
Wright, Kallum
Rosengaus, Rebeca B.
Cole, Erin L.
Birch, Graham
Maune, Avery L.
Cant, Michael A.
Who goes there? Social surveillance as a response to intergroup conflict in a primitive termite
title Who goes there? Social surveillance as a response to intergroup conflict in a primitive termite
title_full Who goes there? Social surveillance as a response to intergroup conflict in a primitive termite
title_fullStr Who goes there? Social surveillance as a response to intergroup conflict in a primitive termite
title_full_unstemmed Who goes there? Social surveillance as a response to intergroup conflict in a primitive termite
title_short Who goes there? Social surveillance as a response to intergroup conflict in a primitive termite
title_sort who goes there? social surveillance as a response to intergroup conflict in a primitive termite
topic Animal Behaviour
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423038/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2020.0131
work_keys_str_mv AT thompsonfayej whogoestheresocialsurveillanceasaresponsetointergroupconflictinaprimitivetermite
AT huntkingsleyl whogoestheresocialsurveillanceasaresponsetointergroupconflictinaprimitivetermite
AT wrightkallum whogoestheresocialsurveillanceasaresponsetointergroupconflictinaprimitivetermite
AT rosengausrebecab whogoestheresocialsurveillanceasaresponsetointergroupconflictinaprimitivetermite
AT coleerinl whogoestheresocialsurveillanceasaresponsetointergroupconflictinaprimitivetermite
AT birchgraham whogoestheresocialsurveillanceasaresponsetointergroupconflictinaprimitivetermite
AT mauneaveryl whogoestheresocialsurveillanceasaresponsetointergroupconflictinaprimitivetermite
AT cantmichaela whogoestheresocialsurveillanceasaresponsetointergroupconflictinaprimitivetermite