Cargando…

Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy

Blended therapy is a new approach combining advantages of face-to-face psychotherapy and Internet- and mobile-based interventions. Acceptance is a fundamental precondition for its implementation. The aim of this study was to assess 1) the acceptance of psychotherapists towards blended therapy, 2) th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Baumeister, Harald, Terhorst, Yannik, Grässle, Cora, Freudenstein, Maren, Nübling, Rüdiger, Ebert, David Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236995
_version_ 1783570109378330624
author Baumeister, Harald
Terhorst, Yannik
Grässle, Cora
Freudenstein, Maren
Nübling, Rüdiger
Ebert, David Daniel
author_facet Baumeister, Harald
Terhorst, Yannik
Grässle, Cora
Freudenstein, Maren
Nübling, Rüdiger
Ebert, David Daniel
author_sort Baumeister, Harald
collection PubMed
description Blended therapy is a new approach combining advantages of face-to-face psychotherapy and Internet- and mobile-based interventions. Acceptance is a fundamental precondition for its implementation. The aim of this study was to assess 1) the acceptance of psychotherapists towards blended therapy, 2) the effectiveness of an acceptance facilitating intervention (AFI) on psychotherapists’ acceptance towards blended therapy and 3) to identify potential effect moderators. Psychotherapists (N = 284) were randomly assigned to a control (CG) or an intervention group (IG). The IG received a short video showing an example of blended therapy, the CG an attention placebo video. Both groups received a reliable online questionnaire assessing acceptance, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence and internet anxiety. Between group differences were examined using t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests. Exploratory analysis was conducted to identify moderators. Psychotherapists in CG showed mixed baseline acceptance towards blended therapy (low = 40%, moderate = 33%, high = 27%). IG showed significantly higher acceptance compared to CG (d = .27, p(one-sided) = .029; low = 24%, moderate = 47%, high = 30%). Bootstrapped confidence intervals were overlapping. Performance expectancy (d = .35), effort expectancy (d = .44) and facilitating conditions (d = .28) were significantly increased (p < .05). No effects on social influence and internet anxiety were found (p>.05). Exploratory analysis indicated psychodynamic oriented psychotherapists profiting particularly from the AFI. Blended therapy is a promising approach to improve healthcare. Psychotherapists show mixed acceptance, which might be improvable by AFIs, particularly in subpopulations of initially rather skeptical psychotherapists. Forthcoming studies should extend the present study by shifting focus from attitudes to the impact of different forms of AFIs on uptake.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7423074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74230742020-08-20 Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy Baumeister, Harald Terhorst, Yannik Grässle, Cora Freudenstein, Maren Nübling, Rüdiger Ebert, David Daniel PLoS One Research Article Blended therapy is a new approach combining advantages of face-to-face psychotherapy and Internet- and mobile-based interventions. Acceptance is a fundamental precondition for its implementation. The aim of this study was to assess 1) the acceptance of psychotherapists towards blended therapy, 2) the effectiveness of an acceptance facilitating intervention (AFI) on psychotherapists’ acceptance towards blended therapy and 3) to identify potential effect moderators. Psychotherapists (N = 284) were randomly assigned to a control (CG) or an intervention group (IG). The IG received a short video showing an example of blended therapy, the CG an attention placebo video. Both groups received a reliable online questionnaire assessing acceptance, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence and internet anxiety. Between group differences were examined using t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests. Exploratory analysis was conducted to identify moderators. Psychotherapists in CG showed mixed baseline acceptance towards blended therapy (low = 40%, moderate = 33%, high = 27%). IG showed significantly higher acceptance compared to CG (d = .27, p(one-sided) = .029; low = 24%, moderate = 47%, high = 30%). Bootstrapped confidence intervals were overlapping. Performance expectancy (d = .35), effort expectancy (d = .44) and facilitating conditions (d = .28) were significantly increased (p < .05). No effects on social influence and internet anxiety were found (p>.05). Exploratory analysis indicated psychodynamic oriented psychotherapists profiting particularly from the AFI. Blended therapy is a promising approach to improve healthcare. Psychotherapists show mixed acceptance, which might be improvable by AFIs, particularly in subpopulations of initially rather skeptical psychotherapists. Forthcoming studies should extend the present study by shifting focus from attitudes to the impact of different forms of AFIs on uptake. Public Library of Science 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7423074/ /pubmed/32785245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236995 Text en © 2020 Baumeister et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Baumeister, Harald
Terhorst, Yannik
Grässle, Cora
Freudenstein, Maren
Nübling, Rüdiger
Ebert, David Daniel
Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy
title Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy
title_full Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy
title_fullStr Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy
title_full_unstemmed Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy
title_short Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy
title_sort impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785245
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236995
work_keys_str_mv AT baumeisterharald impactofanacceptancefacilitatinginterventiononpsychotherapistsacceptanceofblendedtherapy
AT terhorstyannik impactofanacceptancefacilitatinginterventiononpsychotherapistsacceptanceofblendedtherapy
AT grasslecora impactofanacceptancefacilitatinginterventiononpsychotherapistsacceptanceofblendedtherapy
AT freudensteinmaren impactofanacceptancefacilitatinginterventiononpsychotherapistsacceptanceofblendedtherapy
AT nublingrudiger impactofanacceptancefacilitatinginterventiononpsychotherapistsacceptanceofblendedtherapy
AT ebertdaviddaniel impactofanacceptancefacilitatinginterventiononpsychotherapistsacceptanceofblendedtherapy