Cargando…
Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy
Blended therapy is a new approach combining advantages of face-to-face psychotherapy and Internet- and mobile-based interventions. Acceptance is a fundamental precondition for its implementation. The aim of this study was to assess 1) the acceptance of psychotherapists towards blended therapy, 2) th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236995 |
_version_ | 1783570109378330624 |
---|---|
author | Baumeister, Harald Terhorst, Yannik Grässle, Cora Freudenstein, Maren Nübling, Rüdiger Ebert, David Daniel |
author_facet | Baumeister, Harald Terhorst, Yannik Grässle, Cora Freudenstein, Maren Nübling, Rüdiger Ebert, David Daniel |
author_sort | Baumeister, Harald |
collection | PubMed |
description | Blended therapy is a new approach combining advantages of face-to-face psychotherapy and Internet- and mobile-based interventions. Acceptance is a fundamental precondition for its implementation. The aim of this study was to assess 1) the acceptance of psychotherapists towards blended therapy, 2) the effectiveness of an acceptance facilitating intervention (AFI) on psychotherapists’ acceptance towards blended therapy and 3) to identify potential effect moderators. Psychotherapists (N = 284) were randomly assigned to a control (CG) or an intervention group (IG). The IG received a short video showing an example of blended therapy, the CG an attention placebo video. Both groups received a reliable online questionnaire assessing acceptance, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence and internet anxiety. Between group differences were examined using t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests. Exploratory analysis was conducted to identify moderators. Psychotherapists in CG showed mixed baseline acceptance towards blended therapy (low = 40%, moderate = 33%, high = 27%). IG showed significantly higher acceptance compared to CG (d = .27, p(one-sided) = .029; low = 24%, moderate = 47%, high = 30%). Bootstrapped confidence intervals were overlapping. Performance expectancy (d = .35), effort expectancy (d = .44) and facilitating conditions (d = .28) were significantly increased (p < .05). No effects on social influence and internet anxiety were found (p>.05). Exploratory analysis indicated psychodynamic oriented psychotherapists profiting particularly from the AFI. Blended therapy is a promising approach to improve healthcare. Psychotherapists show mixed acceptance, which might be improvable by AFIs, particularly in subpopulations of initially rather skeptical psychotherapists. Forthcoming studies should extend the present study by shifting focus from attitudes to the impact of different forms of AFIs on uptake. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7423074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74230742020-08-20 Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy Baumeister, Harald Terhorst, Yannik Grässle, Cora Freudenstein, Maren Nübling, Rüdiger Ebert, David Daniel PLoS One Research Article Blended therapy is a new approach combining advantages of face-to-face psychotherapy and Internet- and mobile-based interventions. Acceptance is a fundamental precondition for its implementation. The aim of this study was to assess 1) the acceptance of psychotherapists towards blended therapy, 2) the effectiveness of an acceptance facilitating intervention (AFI) on psychotherapists’ acceptance towards blended therapy and 3) to identify potential effect moderators. Psychotherapists (N = 284) were randomly assigned to a control (CG) or an intervention group (IG). The IG received a short video showing an example of blended therapy, the CG an attention placebo video. Both groups received a reliable online questionnaire assessing acceptance, effort expectancy, performance expectancy, facilitating conditions, social influence and internet anxiety. Between group differences were examined using t-tests and Mann-Whitney tests. Exploratory analysis was conducted to identify moderators. Psychotherapists in CG showed mixed baseline acceptance towards blended therapy (low = 40%, moderate = 33%, high = 27%). IG showed significantly higher acceptance compared to CG (d = .27, p(one-sided) = .029; low = 24%, moderate = 47%, high = 30%). Bootstrapped confidence intervals were overlapping. Performance expectancy (d = .35), effort expectancy (d = .44) and facilitating conditions (d = .28) were significantly increased (p < .05). No effects on social influence and internet anxiety were found (p>.05). Exploratory analysis indicated psychodynamic oriented psychotherapists profiting particularly from the AFI. Blended therapy is a promising approach to improve healthcare. Psychotherapists show mixed acceptance, which might be improvable by AFIs, particularly in subpopulations of initially rather skeptical psychotherapists. Forthcoming studies should extend the present study by shifting focus from attitudes to the impact of different forms of AFIs on uptake. Public Library of Science 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7423074/ /pubmed/32785245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236995 Text en © 2020 Baumeister et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Baumeister, Harald Terhorst, Yannik Grässle, Cora Freudenstein, Maren Nübling, Rüdiger Ebert, David Daniel Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy |
title | Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy |
title_full | Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy |
title_fullStr | Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy |
title_short | Impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy |
title_sort | impact of an acceptance facilitating intervention on psychotherapists’ acceptance of blended therapy |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236995 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baumeisterharald impactofanacceptancefacilitatinginterventiononpsychotherapistsacceptanceofblendedtherapy AT terhorstyannik impactofanacceptancefacilitatinginterventiononpsychotherapistsacceptanceofblendedtherapy AT grasslecora impactofanacceptancefacilitatinginterventiononpsychotherapistsacceptanceofblendedtherapy AT freudensteinmaren impactofanacceptancefacilitatinginterventiononpsychotherapistsacceptanceofblendedtherapy AT nublingrudiger impactofanacceptancefacilitatinginterventiononpsychotherapistsacceptanceofblendedtherapy AT ebertdaviddaniel impactofanacceptancefacilitatinginterventiononpsychotherapistsacceptanceofblendedtherapy |