Cargando…
A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses
The induction of general plant defense responses following the perception of external elicitors is now regarded as the first level of the plant immune response. Depending on the involvement or not of these molecules in pathogenicity, this induction of defense is called either Pathogen-Associated Mol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236633 |
_version_ | 1783570117320245248 |
---|---|
author | Martin, Rafaela Lopes Le Boulch, Pauline Clin, Pauline Schwarzenberg, Adrián Yvin, Jean-Claude Andrivon, Didier Nguema-Ona, Eric Val, Florence |
author_facet | Martin, Rafaela Lopes Le Boulch, Pauline Clin, Pauline Schwarzenberg, Adrián Yvin, Jean-Claude Andrivon, Didier Nguema-Ona, Eric Val, Florence |
author_sort | Martin, Rafaela Lopes |
collection | PubMed |
description | The induction of general plant defense responses following the perception of external elicitors is now regarded as the first level of the plant immune response. Depending on the involvement or not of these molecules in pathogenicity, this induction of defense is called either Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern (PAMP) Triggered Immunity or Pattern Triggered Immunity—both abbreviated to PTI. Because PTI is assumed to be a widespread and stable form of resistance to infection, understanding the mechanisms driving it becomes a major goal for the sustainable management of plant-pathogen interactions. However, the induction of PTI is complex. Our hypotheses are that (i) the recognition by the plant of PAMPs vs non-PAMP elicitors leads to specific defense profiles and (ii) the responses specifically induced by PAMPs target critical life history traits of the pathogen that produced them. We thus analyzed, using a metabolomic approach coupled with transcriptomic and hormonal analyses, the defense profiles induced in potato foliage treated with either a Concentrated Culture Filtrate (CCF) from Phytophthora infestans or two non-PAMP preparations, β-aminobutyric acid (BABA) and an Ulva spp. Extract, used separately. Each elicitor induced specific defense profiles. CCF up-regulated sesquiterpenes but down-regulated sterols and phenols, notably α-chaconine, caffeoyl quinic acid and rutin, which decreased spore production of P. infestans in vitro. CCF thus induces both defense and counter-defense responses. By contrast, the Ulva extract triggered the synthesis of a large-spectrum of antimicrobial compounds through the phenylpropanoid/flavonoid pathways, while BABA targeted the primary metabolism. Hence, PTI can be regarded as a heterogeneous set of general and pathogen-specific responses triggered by the molecular signatures of each elicitor, rather than as a uniform, non-specific and broad-spectrum set of general defense reactions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7423108 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74231082020-08-20 A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses Martin, Rafaela Lopes Le Boulch, Pauline Clin, Pauline Schwarzenberg, Adrián Yvin, Jean-Claude Andrivon, Didier Nguema-Ona, Eric Val, Florence PLoS One Research Article The induction of general plant defense responses following the perception of external elicitors is now regarded as the first level of the plant immune response. Depending on the involvement or not of these molecules in pathogenicity, this induction of defense is called either Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern (PAMP) Triggered Immunity or Pattern Triggered Immunity—both abbreviated to PTI. Because PTI is assumed to be a widespread and stable form of resistance to infection, understanding the mechanisms driving it becomes a major goal for the sustainable management of plant-pathogen interactions. However, the induction of PTI is complex. Our hypotheses are that (i) the recognition by the plant of PAMPs vs non-PAMP elicitors leads to specific defense profiles and (ii) the responses specifically induced by PAMPs target critical life history traits of the pathogen that produced them. We thus analyzed, using a metabolomic approach coupled with transcriptomic and hormonal analyses, the defense profiles induced in potato foliage treated with either a Concentrated Culture Filtrate (CCF) from Phytophthora infestans or two non-PAMP preparations, β-aminobutyric acid (BABA) and an Ulva spp. Extract, used separately. Each elicitor induced specific defense profiles. CCF up-regulated sesquiterpenes but down-regulated sterols and phenols, notably α-chaconine, caffeoyl quinic acid and rutin, which decreased spore production of P. infestans in vitro. CCF thus induces both defense and counter-defense responses. By contrast, the Ulva extract triggered the synthesis of a large-spectrum of antimicrobial compounds through the phenylpropanoid/flavonoid pathways, while BABA targeted the primary metabolism. Hence, PTI can be regarded as a heterogeneous set of general and pathogen-specific responses triggered by the molecular signatures of each elicitor, rather than as a uniform, non-specific and broad-spectrum set of general defense reactions. Public Library of Science 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7423108/ /pubmed/32785249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236633 Text en © 2020 Martin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Martin, Rafaela Lopes Le Boulch, Pauline Clin, Pauline Schwarzenberg, Adrián Yvin, Jean-Claude Andrivon, Didier Nguema-Ona, Eric Val, Florence A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses |
title | A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses |
title_full | A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses |
title_fullStr | A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses |
title_short | A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses |
title_sort | comparison of pti defense profiles induced in solanum tuberosum by pamp and non-pamp elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423108/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236633 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinrafaelalopes acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT leboulchpauline acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT clinpauline acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT schwarzenbergadrian acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT yvinjeanclaude acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT andrivondidier acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT nguemaonaeric acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT valflorence acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT martinrafaelalopes comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT leboulchpauline comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT clinpauline comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT schwarzenbergadrian comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT yvinjeanclaude comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT andrivondidier comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT nguemaonaeric comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses AT valflorence comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses |