Cargando…

A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses

The induction of general plant defense responses following the perception of external elicitors is now regarded as the first level of the plant immune response. Depending on the involvement or not of these molecules in pathogenicity, this induction of defense is called either Pathogen-Associated Mol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Rafaela Lopes, Le Boulch, Pauline, Clin, Pauline, Schwarzenberg, Adrián, Yvin, Jean-Claude, Andrivon, Didier, Nguema-Ona, Eric, Val, Florence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236633
_version_ 1783570117320245248
author Martin, Rafaela Lopes
Le Boulch, Pauline
Clin, Pauline
Schwarzenberg, Adrián
Yvin, Jean-Claude
Andrivon, Didier
Nguema-Ona, Eric
Val, Florence
author_facet Martin, Rafaela Lopes
Le Boulch, Pauline
Clin, Pauline
Schwarzenberg, Adrián
Yvin, Jean-Claude
Andrivon, Didier
Nguema-Ona, Eric
Val, Florence
author_sort Martin, Rafaela Lopes
collection PubMed
description The induction of general plant defense responses following the perception of external elicitors is now regarded as the first level of the plant immune response. Depending on the involvement or not of these molecules in pathogenicity, this induction of defense is called either Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern (PAMP) Triggered Immunity or Pattern Triggered Immunity—both abbreviated to PTI. Because PTI is assumed to be a widespread and stable form of resistance to infection, understanding the mechanisms driving it becomes a major goal for the sustainable management of plant-pathogen interactions. However, the induction of PTI is complex. Our hypotheses are that (i) the recognition by the plant of PAMPs vs non-PAMP elicitors leads to specific defense profiles and (ii) the responses specifically induced by PAMPs target critical life history traits of the pathogen that produced them. We thus analyzed, using a metabolomic approach coupled with transcriptomic and hormonal analyses, the defense profiles induced in potato foliage treated with either a Concentrated Culture Filtrate (CCF) from Phytophthora infestans or two non-PAMP preparations, β-aminobutyric acid (BABA) and an Ulva spp. Extract, used separately. Each elicitor induced specific defense profiles. CCF up-regulated sesquiterpenes but down-regulated sterols and phenols, notably α-chaconine, caffeoyl quinic acid and rutin, which decreased spore production of P. infestans in vitro. CCF thus induces both defense and counter-defense responses. By contrast, the Ulva extract triggered the synthesis of a large-spectrum of antimicrobial compounds through the phenylpropanoid/flavonoid pathways, while BABA targeted the primary metabolism. Hence, PTI can be regarded as a heterogeneous set of general and pathogen-specific responses triggered by the molecular signatures of each elicitor, rather than as a uniform, non-specific and broad-spectrum set of general defense reactions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7423108
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74231082020-08-20 A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses Martin, Rafaela Lopes Le Boulch, Pauline Clin, Pauline Schwarzenberg, Adrián Yvin, Jean-Claude Andrivon, Didier Nguema-Ona, Eric Val, Florence PLoS One Research Article The induction of general plant defense responses following the perception of external elicitors is now regarded as the first level of the plant immune response. Depending on the involvement or not of these molecules in pathogenicity, this induction of defense is called either Pathogen-Associated Molecular Pattern (PAMP) Triggered Immunity or Pattern Triggered Immunity—both abbreviated to PTI. Because PTI is assumed to be a widespread and stable form of resistance to infection, understanding the mechanisms driving it becomes a major goal for the sustainable management of plant-pathogen interactions. However, the induction of PTI is complex. Our hypotheses are that (i) the recognition by the plant of PAMPs vs non-PAMP elicitors leads to specific defense profiles and (ii) the responses specifically induced by PAMPs target critical life history traits of the pathogen that produced them. We thus analyzed, using a metabolomic approach coupled with transcriptomic and hormonal analyses, the defense profiles induced in potato foliage treated with either a Concentrated Culture Filtrate (CCF) from Phytophthora infestans or two non-PAMP preparations, β-aminobutyric acid (BABA) and an Ulva spp. Extract, used separately. Each elicitor induced specific defense profiles. CCF up-regulated sesquiterpenes but down-regulated sterols and phenols, notably α-chaconine, caffeoyl quinic acid and rutin, which decreased spore production of P. infestans in vitro. CCF thus induces both defense and counter-defense responses. By contrast, the Ulva extract triggered the synthesis of a large-spectrum of antimicrobial compounds through the phenylpropanoid/flavonoid pathways, while BABA targeted the primary metabolism. Hence, PTI can be regarded as a heterogeneous set of general and pathogen-specific responses triggered by the molecular signatures of each elicitor, rather than as a uniform, non-specific and broad-spectrum set of general defense reactions. Public Library of Science 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7423108/ /pubmed/32785249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236633 Text en © 2020 Martin et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martin, Rafaela Lopes
Le Boulch, Pauline
Clin, Pauline
Schwarzenberg, Adrián
Yvin, Jean-Claude
Andrivon, Didier
Nguema-Ona, Eric
Val, Florence
A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses
title A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses
title_full A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses
title_fullStr A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses
title_short A comparison of PTI defense profiles induced in Solanum tuberosum by PAMP and non-PAMP elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses
title_sort comparison of pti defense profiles induced in solanum tuberosum by pamp and non-pamp elicitors shows distinct, elicitor-specific responses
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423108/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785249
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236633
work_keys_str_mv AT martinrafaelalopes acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT leboulchpauline acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT clinpauline acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT schwarzenbergadrian acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT yvinjeanclaude acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT andrivondidier acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT nguemaonaeric acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT valflorence acomparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT martinrafaelalopes comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT leboulchpauline comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT clinpauline comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT schwarzenbergadrian comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT yvinjeanclaude comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT andrivondidier comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT nguemaonaeric comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses
AT valflorence comparisonofptidefenseprofilesinducedinsolanumtuberosumbypampandnonpampelicitorsshowsdistinctelicitorspecificresponses