Cargando…

The prevalence and genomic context of Shiga toxin 2a genes in E. coli found in cattle

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) that cause severe disease predominantly carry the toxin gene variant stx(2a). However, the role of Shiga toxin in the ruminant reservoirs of this zoonotic pathogen is poorly understood and strains that cause severe disease in humans (HUSEC) likely consti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jinnerot, Tomas, Tomaselli, Angeles Tatiana Ponton, Johannessen, Gro Skøien, Söderlund, Robert, Urdahl, Anne Margrete, Aspán, Anna, Sekse, Camilla
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785271
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232305
Descripción
Sumario:Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) that cause severe disease predominantly carry the toxin gene variant stx(2a). However, the role of Shiga toxin in the ruminant reservoirs of this zoonotic pathogen is poorly understood and strains that cause severe disease in humans (HUSEC) likely constitute a small and atypical subset of the overall STEC flora. The aim of this study was to investigate the presence of stx(2a) in samples from cattle and to isolate and characterize stx(2a)-positive E. coli. In nationwide surveys in Sweden and Norway samples were collected from individual cattle or from cattle herds, respectively. Samples were tested for Shiga toxin genes by real-time PCR and amplicon sequencing and stx(2a)-positive isolates were whole genome sequenced. Among faecal samples from Sweden, stx(1) was detected in 37%, stx(2) in 53% and stx(2a) in 5% and in skin (ear) samples in 64%, 79% and 2% respectively. In Norway, 79% of the herds were positive for stx(1), 93% for stx(2) and 17% for stx(2a). Based on amplicon sequencing the most common stx(2) types in samples from Swedish cattle were stx(2a) and stx(2d). Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of 39 stx(2a)-positive isolates collected from both countries revealed substantial diversity with 19 different sequence types. Only a few classical LEE-positive strains similar to HUSEC were found among the stx(2a)-positive isolates, notably a single O121:H19 and an O26:H11. Lineages known to include LEE-negative HUSEC were also recovered including, such as O113:H21 (sequence type ST-223), O130:H11 (ST-297), and O101:H33 (ST-330). We conclude that E. coli encoding stx(2a) in cattle are ranging from strains similar to HUSEC to unknown STEC variants. Comparison of isolates from human HUS cases to related STEC from the ruminant reservoirs can help identify combinations of virulence attributes necessary to cause HUS, as well as provide a better understanding of the routes of infection for rare and emerging pathogenic STEC.