Cargando…

Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development

Müllerian mimicry strongly exemplifies the power of natural selection. However, the exact measure of such adaptive phenotypic convergence and the possible causes of its imperfection often remain unidentified. Here, we first quantify wing colour pattern differences in the forewing region of 14 co-mim...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Van Belleghem, Steven M., Alicea Roman, Paola A., Carbia Gutierrez, Heriberto, Counterman, Brian A., Papa, Riccardo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32693728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1267
_version_ 1783570190330494976
author Van Belleghem, Steven M.
Alicea Roman, Paola A.
Carbia Gutierrez, Heriberto
Counterman, Brian A.
Papa, Riccardo
author_facet Van Belleghem, Steven M.
Alicea Roman, Paola A.
Carbia Gutierrez, Heriberto
Counterman, Brian A.
Papa, Riccardo
author_sort Van Belleghem, Steven M.
collection PubMed
description Müllerian mimicry strongly exemplifies the power of natural selection. However, the exact measure of such adaptive phenotypic convergence and the possible causes of its imperfection often remain unidentified. Here, we first quantify wing colour pattern differences in the forewing region of 14 co-mimetic colour pattern morphs of the butterfly species Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene and measure the extent to which mimicking colour pattern morphs are not perfectly identical. Next, using gene-editing CRISPR/Cas9 KO experiments of the gene WntA, which has been mapped to colour pattern diversity in these butterflies, we explore the exact areas of the wings in which WntA affects colour pattern formation differently in H. erato and H. melpomene. We find that, while the relative size of the forewing pattern is generally nearly identical between co-mimics, the CRISPR/Cas9 KO results highlight divergent boundaries in the wing that prevent the co-mimics from achieving perfect mimicry. We suggest that this mismatch may be explained by divergence in the gene regulatory network that defines wing colour patterning in both species, thus constraining morphological evolution even between closely related species.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7423669
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Royal Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74236692020-08-21 Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development Van Belleghem, Steven M. Alicea Roman, Paola A. Carbia Gutierrez, Heriberto Counterman, Brian A. Papa, Riccardo Proc Biol Sci Evolution Müllerian mimicry strongly exemplifies the power of natural selection. However, the exact measure of such adaptive phenotypic convergence and the possible causes of its imperfection often remain unidentified. Here, we first quantify wing colour pattern differences in the forewing region of 14 co-mimetic colour pattern morphs of the butterfly species Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene and measure the extent to which mimicking colour pattern morphs are not perfectly identical. Next, using gene-editing CRISPR/Cas9 KO experiments of the gene WntA, which has been mapped to colour pattern diversity in these butterflies, we explore the exact areas of the wings in which WntA affects colour pattern formation differently in H. erato and H. melpomene. We find that, while the relative size of the forewing pattern is generally nearly identical between co-mimics, the CRISPR/Cas9 KO results highlight divergent boundaries in the wing that prevent the co-mimics from achieving perfect mimicry. We suggest that this mismatch may be explained by divergence in the gene regulatory network that defines wing colour patterning in both species, thus constraining morphological evolution even between closely related species. The Royal Society 2020-07-29 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7423669/ /pubmed/32693728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1267 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Evolution
Van Belleghem, Steven M.
Alicea Roman, Paola A.
Carbia Gutierrez, Heriberto
Counterman, Brian A.
Papa, Riccardo
Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development
title Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development
title_full Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development
title_fullStr Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development
title_full_unstemmed Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development
title_short Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development
title_sort perfect mimicry between heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development
topic Evolution
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423669/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32693728
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1267
work_keys_str_mv AT vanbelleghemstevenm perfectmimicrybetweenheliconiusbutterfliesisconstrainedbygeneticsanddevelopment
AT alicearomanpaolaa perfectmimicrybetweenheliconiusbutterfliesisconstrainedbygeneticsanddevelopment
AT carbiagutierrezheriberto perfectmimicrybetweenheliconiusbutterfliesisconstrainedbygeneticsanddevelopment
AT countermanbriana perfectmimicrybetweenheliconiusbutterfliesisconstrainedbygeneticsanddevelopment
AT papariccardo perfectmimicrybetweenheliconiusbutterfliesisconstrainedbygeneticsanddevelopment