Cargando…
Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development
Müllerian mimicry strongly exemplifies the power of natural selection. However, the exact measure of such adaptive phenotypic convergence and the possible causes of its imperfection often remain unidentified. Here, we first quantify wing colour pattern differences in the forewing region of 14 co-mim...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32693728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1267 |
_version_ | 1783570190330494976 |
---|---|
author | Van Belleghem, Steven M. Alicea Roman, Paola A. Carbia Gutierrez, Heriberto Counterman, Brian A. Papa, Riccardo |
author_facet | Van Belleghem, Steven M. Alicea Roman, Paola A. Carbia Gutierrez, Heriberto Counterman, Brian A. Papa, Riccardo |
author_sort | Van Belleghem, Steven M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Müllerian mimicry strongly exemplifies the power of natural selection. However, the exact measure of such adaptive phenotypic convergence and the possible causes of its imperfection often remain unidentified. Here, we first quantify wing colour pattern differences in the forewing region of 14 co-mimetic colour pattern morphs of the butterfly species Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene and measure the extent to which mimicking colour pattern morphs are not perfectly identical. Next, using gene-editing CRISPR/Cas9 KO experiments of the gene WntA, which has been mapped to colour pattern diversity in these butterflies, we explore the exact areas of the wings in which WntA affects colour pattern formation differently in H. erato and H. melpomene. We find that, while the relative size of the forewing pattern is generally nearly identical between co-mimics, the CRISPR/Cas9 KO results highlight divergent boundaries in the wing that prevent the co-mimics from achieving perfect mimicry. We suggest that this mismatch may be explained by divergence in the gene regulatory network that defines wing colour patterning in both species, thus constraining morphological evolution even between closely related species. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7423669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74236692020-08-21 Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development Van Belleghem, Steven M. Alicea Roman, Paola A. Carbia Gutierrez, Heriberto Counterman, Brian A. Papa, Riccardo Proc Biol Sci Evolution Müllerian mimicry strongly exemplifies the power of natural selection. However, the exact measure of such adaptive phenotypic convergence and the possible causes of its imperfection often remain unidentified. Here, we first quantify wing colour pattern differences in the forewing region of 14 co-mimetic colour pattern morphs of the butterfly species Heliconius erato and Heliconius melpomene and measure the extent to which mimicking colour pattern morphs are not perfectly identical. Next, using gene-editing CRISPR/Cas9 KO experiments of the gene WntA, which has been mapped to colour pattern diversity in these butterflies, we explore the exact areas of the wings in which WntA affects colour pattern formation differently in H. erato and H. melpomene. We find that, while the relative size of the forewing pattern is generally nearly identical between co-mimics, the CRISPR/Cas9 KO results highlight divergent boundaries in the wing that prevent the co-mimics from achieving perfect mimicry. We suggest that this mismatch may be explained by divergence in the gene regulatory network that defines wing colour patterning in both species, thus constraining morphological evolution even between closely related species. The Royal Society 2020-07-29 2020-07-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7423669/ /pubmed/32693728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1267 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Evolution Van Belleghem, Steven M. Alicea Roman, Paola A. Carbia Gutierrez, Heriberto Counterman, Brian A. Papa, Riccardo Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development |
title | Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development |
title_full | Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development |
title_fullStr | Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development |
title_full_unstemmed | Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development |
title_short | Perfect mimicry between Heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development |
title_sort | perfect mimicry between heliconius butterflies is constrained by genetics and development |
topic | Evolution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32693728 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.1267 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanbelleghemstevenm perfectmimicrybetweenheliconiusbutterfliesisconstrainedbygeneticsanddevelopment AT alicearomanpaolaa perfectmimicrybetweenheliconiusbutterfliesisconstrainedbygeneticsanddevelopment AT carbiagutierrezheriberto perfectmimicrybetweenheliconiusbutterfliesisconstrainedbygeneticsanddevelopment AT countermanbriana perfectmimicrybetweenheliconiusbutterfliesisconstrainedbygeneticsanddevelopment AT papariccardo perfectmimicrybetweenheliconiusbutterfliesisconstrainedbygeneticsanddevelopment |