Cargando…

Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1—population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling

It has been proposed that finite element analysis can complement clinical decision making for the appropriate design and manufacture of prosthetic sockets for amputees. However, clinical translation has not been achieved, in part due to lengthy solver times and the complexity involved in model devel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Steer, J. W., Worsley, P. R., Browne, M., Dickinson, A. S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31256276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01195-5
_version_ 1783570199710007296
author Steer, J. W.
Worsley, P. R.
Browne, M.
Dickinson, A. S.
author_facet Steer, J. W.
Worsley, P. R.
Browne, M.
Dickinson, A. S.
author_sort Steer, J. W.
collection PubMed
description It has been proposed that finite element analysis can complement clinical decision making for the appropriate design and manufacture of prosthetic sockets for amputees. However, clinical translation has not been achieved, in part due to lengthy solver times and the complexity involved in model development. In this study, a parametric model was created, informed by variation in (i) population-driven residuum shape morphology, (ii) soft tissue compliance and (iii) prosthetic socket design. A Kriging surrogate model was fitted to the response of the analyses across the design space enabling prediction for new residual limb morphologies and socket designs. It was predicted that morphological variability and prosthetic socket design had a substantial effect on socket-limb interfacial pressure and shear conditions as well as sub-dermal soft tissue strains. These relationships were investigated with a higher resolution of anatomical, surgical and design variability than previously reported, with a reduction in computational expense of six orders of magnitude. This enabled real-time predictions (1.6 ms) with error vs the analytical solutions of < 4 kPa in pressure at residuum tip, and < 3% in soft tissue strain. As such, this framework represents a substantial step towards implementation of finite element analysis in the prosthetics clinic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7423807
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74238072020-08-18 Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1—population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling Steer, J. W. Worsley, P. R. Browne, M. Dickinson, A. S. Biomech Model Mechanobiol Original Paper It has been proposed that finite element analysis can complement clinical decision making for the appropriate design and manufacture of prosthetic sockets for amputees. However, clinical translation has not been achieved, in part due to lengthy solver times and the complexity involved in model development. In this study, a parametric model was created, informed by variation in (i) population-driven residuum shape morphology, (ii) soft tissue compliance and (iii) prosthetic socket design. A Kriging surrogate model was fitted to the response of the analyses across the design space enabling prediction for new residual limb morphologies and socket designs. It was predicted that morphological variability and prosthetic socket design had a substantial effect on socket-limb interfacial pressure and shear conditions as well as sub-dermal soft tissue strains. These relationships were investigated with a higher resolution of anatomical, surgical and design variability than previously reported, with a reduction in computational expense of six orders of magnitude. This enabled real-time predictions (1.6 ms) with error vs the analytical solutions of < 4 kPa in pressure at residuum tip, and < 3% in soft tissue strain. As such, this framework represents a substantial step towards implementation of finite element analysis in the prosthetics clinic. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-06-29 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7423807/ /pubmed/31256276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01195-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Steer, J. W.
Worsley, P. R.
Browne, M.
Dickinson, A. S.
Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1—population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling
title Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1—population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling
title_full Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1—population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling
title_fullStr Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1—population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling
title_full_unstemmed Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1—population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling
title_short Predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1—population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by FEA-driven surrogate modelling
title_sort predictive prosthetic socket design: part 1—population-based evaluation of transtibial prosthetic sockets by fea-driven surrogate modelling
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423807/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31256276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10237-019-01195-5
work_keys_str_mv AT steerjw predictiveprostheticsocketdesignpart1populationbasedevaluationoftranstibialprostheticsocketsbyfeadrivensurrogatemodelling
AT worsleypr predictiveprostheticsocketdesignpart1populationbasedevaluationoftranstibialprostheticsocketsbyfeadrivensurrogatemodelling
AT brownem predictiveprostheticsocketdesignpart1populationbasedevaluationoftranstibialprostheticsocketsbyfeadrivensurrogatemodelling
AT dickinsonas predictiveprostheticsocketdesignpart1populationbasedevaluationoftranstibialprostheticsocketsbyfeadrivensurrogatemodelling