Cargando…

Validating the efficacy of interval appendectomy for acute appendicitis: representative three cases with different etiologies

BACKGROUND: Appendectomy for acute appendicitis (AA) is considered one of the most common emergency surgeries. However, emergency appendectomy accompanied with complex lesions such as extensive abscess formation is not recommended in most cases. Therefore, non-operative management followed by interv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasagi, Yuta, Natsugoe, Keita, Aoyagi, Takehiko, Nobutou, Yoshinari, Tsujita, Eiji, Ishida, Mayumi, Kuma, Sosei, Takizawa, Katsumi, Uchiyama, Hideaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00971-1
_version_ 1783570202749829120
author Kasagi, Yuta
Natsugoe, Keita
Aoyagi, Takehiko
Nobutou, Yoshinari
Tsujita, Eiji
Ishida, Mayumi
Kuma, Sosei
Takizawa, Katsumi
Uchiyama, Hideaki
author_facet Kasagi, Yuta
Natsugoe, Keita
Aoyagi, Takehiko
Nobutou, Yoshinari
Tsujita, Eiji
Ishida, Mayumi
Kuma, Sosei
Takizawa, Katsumi
Uchiyama, Hideaki
author_sort Kasagi, Yuta
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Appendectomy for acute appendicitis (AA) is considered one of the most common emergency surgeries. However, emergency appendectomy accompanied with complex lesions such as extensive abscess formation is not recommended in most cases. Therefore, non-operative management followed by interval appendectomy (IA) for AA has been tried. Herein, we present three AA cases with specific etiology that underwent interval appendectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: A 68-year-old man was diagnosed AA with intestinal malrotation and intra-abdominal abscesses. He initially treated with conservative therapy and underwent laparoscopic IA after detailed preoperative examination. Case 2: A 22-year-old man had been under treatment for pancolitis-type ulcerative colitis (UC), also bothered by right-lower abdominal pain several times a year. The appendix always appeared swollen on every CT taken during symptoms. He underwent laparoscopic IA; pathological finding revealed typical UC histological features in the resected appendix. After the surgery, he never suffered from terrible right lower abdominal pain. Case 3: A 69-year-old woman complaining a right lower abdominal pain had undergone CT examination, which revealed AA with appendiceal mass, irregular wall thickness of the cecum, and mediastinal and para-aortic lymph node swelling. The operation was carried out after conservative therapy. The pathological diagnosis revealed BRAF mutated colorectal carcinoma. She had received systematic chemotherapy after the surgery, and all metastatic lesions have completely disappeared. CONCLUSION: Interval appendectomy provided us with much clearer anatomical information and precise therapeutic strategies, avoiding technical and general operative complications, and also induced fast recovery and short length of hospital stay. Interval appendectomy is a reasonable procedure and could be recommended in case of AA with some different etiology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7423822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74238222020-08-18 Validating the efficacy of interval appendectomy for acute appendicitis: representative three cases with different etiologies Kasagi, Yuta Natsugoe, Keita Aoyagi, Takehiko Nobutou, Yoshinari Tsujita, Eiji Ishida, Mayumi Kuma, Sosei Takizawa, Katsumi Uchiyama, Hideaki Surg Case Rep Case Report BACKGROUND: Appendectomy for acute appendicitis (AA) is considered one of the most common emergency surgeries. However, emergency appendectomy accompanied with complex lesions such as extensive abscess formation is not recommended in most cases. Therefore, non-operative management followed by interval appendectomy (IA) for AA has been tried. Herein, we present three AA cases with specific etiology that underwent interval appendectomy. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1: A 68-year-old man was diagnosed AA with intestinal malrotation and intra-abdominal abscesses. He initially treated with conservative therapy and underwent laparoscopic IA after detailed preoperative examination. Case 2: A 22-year-old man had been under treatment for pancolitis-type ulcerative colitis (UC), also bothered by right-lower abdominal pain several times a year. The appendix always appeared swollen on every CT taken during symptoms. He underwent laparoscopic IA; pathological finding revealed typical UC histological features in the resected appendix. After the surgery, he never suffered from terrible right lower abdominal pain. Case 3: A 69-year-old woman complaining a right lower abdominal pain had undergone CT examination, which revealed AA with appendiceal mass, irregular wall thickness of the cecum, and mediastinal and para-aortic lymph node swelling. The operation was carried out after conservative therapy. The pathological diagnosis revealed BRAF mutated colorectal carcinoma. She had received systematic chemotherapy after the surgery, and all metastatic lesions have completely disappeared. CONCLUSION: Interval appendectomy provided us with much clearer anatomical information and precise therapeutic strategies, avoiding technical and general operative complications, and also induced fast recovery and short length of hospital stay. Interval appendectomy is a reasonable procedure and could be recommended in case of AA with some different etiology. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7423822/ /pubmed/32785802 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00971-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Case Report
Kasagi, Yuta
Natsugoe, Keita
Aoyagi, Takehiko
Nobutou, Yoshinari
Tsujita, Eiji
Ishida, Mayumi
Kuma, Sosei
Takizawa, Katsumi
Uchiyama, Hideaki
Validating the efficacy of interval appendectomy for acute appendicitis: representative three cases with different etiologies
title Validating the efficacy of interval appendectomy for acute appendicitis: representative three cases with different etiologies
title_full Validating the efficacy of interval appendectomy for acute appendicitis: representative three cases with different etiologies
title_fullStr Validating the efficacy of interval appendectomy for acute appendicitis: representative three cases with different etiologies
title_full_unstemmed Validating the efficacy of interval appendectomy for acute appendicitis: representative three cases with different etiologies
title_short Validating the efficacy of interval appendectomy for acute appendicitis: representative three cases with different etiologies
title_sort validating the efficacy of interval appendectomy for acute appendicitis: representative three cases with different etiologies
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32785802
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00971-1
work_keys_str_mv AT kasagiyuta validatingtheefficacyofintervalappendectomyforacuteappendicitisrepresentativethreecaseswithdifferentetiologies
AT natsugoekeita validatingtheefficacyofintervalappendectomyforacuteappendicitisrepresentativethreecaseswithdifferentetiologies
AT aoyagitakehiko validatingtheefficacyofintervalappendectomyforacuteappendicitisrepresentativethreecaseswithdifferentetiologies
AT nobutouyoshinari validatingtheefficacyofintervalappendectomyforacuteappendicitisrepresentativethreecaseswithdifferentetiologies
AT tsujitaeiji validatingtheefficacyofintervalappendectomyforacuteappendicitisrepresentativethreecaseswithdifferentetiologies
AT ishidamayumi validatingtheefficacyofintervalappendectomyforacuteappendicitisrepresentativethreecaseswithdifferentetiologies
AT kumasosei validatingtheefficacyofintervalappendectomyforacuteappendicitisrepresentativethreecaseswithdifferentetiologies
AT takizawakatsumi validatingtheefficacyofintervalappendectomyforacuteappendicitisrepresentativethreecaseswithdifferentetiologies
AT uchiyamahideaki validatingtheefficacyofintervalappendectomyforacuteappendicitisrepresentativethreecaseswithdifferentetiologies