Cargando…
Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients
OBJECTIVE: To compare prospectively early outcome and complications of catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) on the 4th or 7th day with a standardized running barbed suture technique. INTRODUCTION: The time point of removing the indwelling catheter after RARP mainly depe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31728670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-03001-4 |
_version_ | 1783570209005633536 |
---|---|
author | Lenart, Sebastian Berger, Ingrid Böhler, Judith Böhm, Reinhard Gutjahr, Georg Hartig, Nikolaus Koller, Daniel Lamche, Michael Madersbacher, Stephan Stolzlechner, Michael Wayand, Claudia Elisa Ponholzer, Anton |
author_facet | Lenart, Sebastian Berger, Ingrid Böhler, Judith Böhm, Reinhard Gutjahr, Georg Hartig, Nikolaus Koller, Daniel Lamche, Michael Madersbacher, Stephan Stolzlechner, Michael Wayand, Claudia Elisa Ponholzer, Anton |
author_sort | Lenart, Sebastian |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare prospectively early outcome and complications of catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) on the 4th or 7th day with a standardized running barbed suture technique. INTRODUCTION: The time point of removing the indwelling catheter after RARP mainly depends on institute’s/surgeon’s preferences. Removal should be late enough to avoid urinary leakage and complications such as acute urinary retention (AUR) but early enough to avoid unnecessary catheter indwelling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive single-institutional series of patients underwent RARP between July 2015 and August 2017 and were entered in a prospectively maintained data base. Between July 2015 and December 2016 a cystogram was performed on 7th postoperative day (group A), thereafter the cystogram was performed on 4th postoperative day (group B). Incidence of acute urinary retention (AUR), urinary tract infections (UTI) and adverse events between the two cohorts was compared. RESULTS: 425 patients were analyzed (group A: n = 231; group B: n = 194). Both cohorts were comparable regarding demographic and oncological parameters. Watertight anastomosis was present in 84.8% in group A and in 82.5% in group B, respectively. AUR within 4 weeks after RARP occurred in 2.2% (n = 3) in A and 9.4% (n = 15) in B (p = 0.001). AUR within 72 h after catheter removal occurred in group A: 1% (n = 2) and in group B: 6.3% (n = 10) (p = 0.005). Symptomatic urinary tract infections occurred in 8.2% (n = 16) in group A and in 6.9% (n = 11) in group B. There were no differences in the rate of secondary anastomosis dehiscence. Age, BMI, prostate size, surgeon, or intraoperative bladder neck reconstruction were not correlated to the occurrence of AUR or UTI. CONCLUSIONS: The removal of indwelling catheter on day 4 after a RARP with a running barbed suture shows similar anastomosis leakage rates as on the 7th postoperative day. However, AUR rates are higher for early removal. Patients scheduled for early removal should be carefully informed about the increased risk for AUR. Catheter indwelling time does not represent a risk factor for UTI. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7423851 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74238512020-08-18 Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients Lenart, Sebastian Berger, Ingrid Böhler, Judith Böhm, Reinhard Gutjahr, Georg Hartig, Nikolaus Koller, Daniel Lamche, Michael Madersbacher, Stephan Stolzlechner, Michael Wayand, Claudia Elisa Ponholzer, Anton World J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To compare prospectively early outcome and complications of catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) on the 4th or 7th day with a standardized running barbed suture technique. INTRODUCTION: The time point of removing the indwelling catheter after RARP mainly depends on institute’s/surgeon’s preferences. Removal should be late enough to avoid urinary leakage and complications such as acute urinary retention (AUR) but early enough to avoid unnecessary catheter indwelling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A consecutive single-institutional series of patients underwent RARP between July 2015 and August 2017 and were entered in a prospectively maintained data base. Between July 2015 and December 2016 a cystogram was performed on 7th postoperative day (group A), thereafter the cystogram was performed on 4th postoperative day (group B). Incidence of acute urinary retention (AUR), urinary tract infections (UTI) and adverse events between the two cohorts was compared. RESULTS: 425 patients were analyzed (group A: n = 231; group B: n = 194). Both cohorts were comparable regarding demographic and oncological parameters. Watertight anastomosis was present in 84.8% in group A and in 82.5% in group B, respectively. AUR within 4 weeks after RARP occurred in 2.2% (n = 3) in A and 9.4% (n = 15) in B (p = 0.001). AUR within 72 h after catheter removal occurred in group A: 1% (n = 2) and in group B: 6.3% (n = 10) (p = 0.005). Symptomatic urinary tract infections occurred in 8.2% (n = 16) in group A and in 6.9% (n = 11) in group B. There were no differences in the rate of secondary anastomosis dehiscence. Age, BMI, prostate size, surgeon, or intraoperative bladder neck reconstruction were not correlated to the occurrence of AUR or UTI. CONCLUSIONS: The removal of indwelling catheter on day 4 after a RARP with a running barbed suture shows similar anastomosis leakage rates as on the 7th postoperative day. However, AUR rates are higher for early removal. Patients scheduled for early removal should be carefully informed about the increased risk for AUR. Catheter indwelling time does not represent a risk factor for UTI. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2019-11-14 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7423851/ /pubmed/31728670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-03001-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2019 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lenart, Sebastian Berger, Ingrid Böhler, Judith Böhm, Reinhard Gutjahr, Georg Hartig, Nikolaus Koller, Daniel Lamche, Michael Madersbacher, Stephan Stolzlechner, Michael Wayand, Claudia Elisa Ponholzer, Anton Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients |
title | Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients |
title_full | Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients |
title_fullStr | Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients |
title_short | Ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients |
title_sort | ideal timing of indwelling catheter removal after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with a running barbed suture technique: a prospective analysis of 425 consecutive patients |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423851/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31728670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-03001-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lenartsebastian idealtimingofindwellingcatheterremovalafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywitharunningbarbedsuturetechniqueaprospectiveanalysisof425consecutivepatients AT bergeringrid idealtimingofindwellingcatheterremovalafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywitharunningbarbedsuturetechniqueaprospectiveanalysisof425consecutivepatients AT bohlerjudith idealtimingofindwellingcatheterremovalafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywitharunningbarbedsuturetechniqueaprospectiveanalysisof425consecutivepatients AT bohmreinhard idealtimingofindwellingcatheterremovalafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywitharunningbarbedsuturetechniqueaprospectiveanalysisof425consecutivepatients AT gutjahrgeorg idealtimingofindwellingcatheterremovalafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywitharunningbarbedsuturetechniqueaprospectiveanalysisof425consecutivepatients AT hartignikolaus idealtimingofindwellingcatheterremovalafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywitharunningbarbedsuturetechniqueaprospectiveanalysisof425consecutivepatients AT kollerdaniel idealtimingofindwellingcatheterremovalafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywitharunningbarbedsuturetechniqueaprospectiveanalysisof425consecutivepatients AT lamchemichael idealtimingofindwellingcatheterremovalafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywitharunningbarbedsuturetechniqueaprospectiveanalysisof425consecutivepatients AT madersbacherstephan idealtimingofindwellingcatheterremovalafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywitharunningbarbedsuturetechniqueaprospectiveanalysisof425consecutivepatients AT stolzlechnermichael idealtimingofindwellingcatheterremovalafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywitharunningbarbedsuturetechniqueaprospectiveanalysisof425consecutivepatients AT wayandclaudiaelisa idealtimingofindwellingcatheterremovalafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywitharunningbarbedsuturetechniqueaprospectiveanalysisof425consecutivepatients AT ponholzeranton idealtimingofindwellingcatheterremovalafterrobotassistedradicalprostatectomywitharunningbarbedsuturetechniqueaprospectiveanalysisof425consecutivepatients |