Cargando…
Comparing different deep learning architectures for classification of chest radiographs
Chest radiographs are among the most frequently acquired images in radiology and are often the subject of computer vision research. However, most of the models used to classify chest radiographs are derived from openly available deep neural networks, trained on large image datasets. These datasets d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70479-z |
_version_ | 1783570235534606336 |
---|---|
author | Bressem, Keno K. Adams, Lisa C. Erxleben, Christoph Hamm, Bernd Niehues, Stefan M. Vahldiek, Janis L. |
author_facet | Bressem, Keno K. Adams, Lisa C. Erxleben, Christoph Hamm, Bernd Niehues, Stefan M. Vahldiek, Janis L. |
author_sort | Bressem, Keno K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Chest radiographs are among the most frequently acquired images in radiology and are often the subject of computer vision research. However, most of the models used to classify chest radiographs are derived from openly available deep neural networks, trained on large image datasets. These datasets differ from chest radiographs in that they are mostly color images and have substantially more labels. Therefore, very deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) designed for ImageNet and often representing more complex relationships, might not be required for the comparably simpler task of classifying medical image data. Sixteen different architectures of CNN were compared regarding the classification performance on two openly available datasets, the CheXpert and COVID-19 Image Data Collection. Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROC) between 0.83 and 0.89 could be achieved on the CheXpert dataset. On the COVID-19 Image Data Collection, all models showed an excellent ability to detect COVID-19 and non-COVID pneumonia with AUROC values between 0.983 and 0.998. It could be observed, that more shallow networks may achieve results comparable to their deeper and more complex counterparts with shorter training times, enabling classification performances on medical image data close to the state-of-the-art methods even when using limited hardware. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7423963 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74239632020-08-14 Comparing different deep learning architectures for classification of chest radiographs Bressem, Keno K. Adams, Lisa C. Erxleben, Christoph Hamm, Bernd Niehues, Stefan M. Vahldiek, Janis L. Sci Rep Article Chest radiographs are among the most frequently acquired images in radiology and are often the subject of computer vision research. However, most of the models used to classify chest radiographs are derived from openly available deep neural networks, trained on large image datasets. These datasets differ from chest radiographs in that they are mostly color images and have substantially more labels. Therefore, very deep convolutional neural networks (CNN) designed for ImageNet and often representing more complex relationships, might not be required for the comparably simpler task of classifying medical image data. Sixteen different architectures of CNN were compared regarding the classification performance on two openly available datasets, the CheXpert and COVID-19 Image Data Collection. Areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUROC) between 0.83 and 0.89 could be achieved on the CheXpert dataset. On the COVID-19 Image Data Collection, all models showed an excellent ability to detect COVID-19 and non-COVID pneumonia with AUROC values between 0.983 and 0.998. It could be observed, that more shallow networks may achieve results comparable to their deeper and more complex counterparts with shorter training times, enabling classification performances on medical image data close to the state-of-the-art methods even when using limited hardware. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7423963/ /pubmed/32788602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70479-z Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Bressem, Keno K. Adams, Lisa C. Erxleben, Christoph Hamm, Bernd Niehues, Stefan M. Vahldiek, Janis L. Comparing different deep learning architectures for classification of chest radiographs |
title | Comparing different deep learning architectures for classification of chest radiographs |
title_full | Comparing different deep learning architectures for classification of chest radiographs |
title_fullStr | Comparing different deep learning architectures for classification of chest radiographs |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing different deep learning architectures for classification of chest radiographs |
title_short | Comparing different deep learning architectures for classification of chest radiographs |
title_sort | comparing different deep learning architectures for classification of chest radiographs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7423963/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32788602 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70479-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bressemkenok comparingdifferentdeeplearningarchitecturesforclassificationofchestradiographs AT adamslisac comparingdifferentdeeplearningarchitecturesforclassificationofchestradiographs AT erxlebenchristoph comparingdifferentdeeplearningarchitecturesforclassificationofchestradiographs AT hammbernd comparingdifferentdeeplearningarchitecturesforclassificationofchestradiographs AT niehuesstefanm comparingdifferentdeeplearningarchitecturesforclassificationofchestradiographs AT vahldiekjanisl comparingdifferentdeeplearningarchitecturesforclassificationofchestradiographs |