Cargando…
3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience
INTRODUCTION: Simulation forms a key element of undergraduate Radiography education as it enables students to develop their clinical skills in a safe environment. In this study, an immersive three-dimensional (3D) virtual radiography simulation tool was piloted in an undergraduate Radiography curric...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32800641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.017 |
_version_ | 1783570318103674880 |
---|---|
author | O'Connor, M. Stowe, J. Potocnik, J. Giannotti, N. Murphy, S. Rainford, L. |
author_facet | O'Connor, M. Stowe, J. Potocnik, J. Giannotti, N. Murphy, S. Rainford, L. |
author_sort | O'Connor, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Simulation forms a key element of undergraduate Radiography education as it enables students to develop their clinical skills in a safe environment. In this study, an immersive three-dimensional (3D) virtual radiography simulation tool was piloted in an undergraduate Radiography curriculum and user feedback retrieved. METHODS: The 3D virtual simulation tool by Virtual Medical Coaching Ltd was introduced to first year radiography students (n = 105). This technology guided students through a comprehensive process of learning anatomy, radiographic positioning and pathology. Students then X-rayed a virtual patient in the VR suite using HTC Vive Pro™ headsets and hand controllers. Instant feedback was provided. An online survey was later disseminated to students to gather user feedback. Thematic and descriptive statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS: A response rate of 79% (n = 83) was achieved. Most respondents (58%) reported enjoying VR simulation, whilst some felt indifferent towards it (27%). Ninety-four percent would recommend this tool to other students. The mean length of time it took for students to feel comfortable using the technology was 60 min (10–240 min). Most respondents (58%) desired more VR access. Students attributed enhanced confidence in the areas of beam collimation (75%), anatomical marker placement (63%), centring of the X-ray tube (64%) and exposure parameter selection (56%) to their VR practice. Many students (55%) advocated the use of VR in formative or low stakes assessments. Issues flagged included technical glitches, inability to palpate patient and lack of constructive feedback. CONCLUSION: Student feedback indicates that 3D virtual radiography simulation is a valuable pedagogical tool in radiography education IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: 3D immersive VR simulation is perceived by radiography students to be a valuable learning resource. VR needs to be strategically implemented into curricula to maximise its benefits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7424334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74243342020-08-13 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience O'Connor, M. Stowe, J. Potocnik, J. Giannotti, N. Murphy, S. Rainford, L. Radiography (Lond) Article INTRODUCTION: Simulation forms a key element of undergraduate Radiography education as it enables students to develop their clinical skills in a safe environment. In this study, an immersive three-dimensional (3D) virtual radiography simulation tool was piloted in an undergraduate Radiography curriculum and user feedback retrieved. METHODS: The 3D virtual simulation tool by Virtual Medical Coaching Ltd was introduced to first year radiography students (n = 105). This technology guided students through a comprehensive process of learning anatomy, radiographic positioning and pathology. Students then X-rayed a virtual patient in the VR suite using HTC Vive Pro™ headsets and hand controllers. Instant feedback was provided. An online survey was later disseminated to students to gather user feedback. Thematic and descriptive statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS: A response rate of 79% (n = 83) was achieved. Most respondents (58%) reported enjoying VR simulation, whilst some felt indifferent towards it (27%). Ninety-four percent would recommend this tool to other students. The mean length of time it took for students to feel comfortable using the technology was 60 min (10–240 min). Most respondents (58%) desired more VR access. Students attributed enhanced confidence in the areas of beam collimation (75%), anatomical marker placement (63%), centring of the X-ray tube (64%) and exposure parameter selection (56%) to their VR practice. Many students (55%) advocated the use of VR in formative or low stakes assessments. Issues flagged included technical glitches, inability to palpate patient and lack of constructive feedback. CONCLUSION: Student feedback indicates that 3D virtual radiography simulation is a valuable pedagogical tool in radiography education IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: 3D immersive VR simulation is perceived by radiography students to be a valuable learning resource. VR needs to be strategically implemented into curricula to maximise its benefits. The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-02 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7424334/ /pubmed/32800641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.017 Text en © 2020 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article O'Connor, M. Stowe, J. Potocnik, J. Giannotti, N. Murphy, S. Rainford, L. 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience |
title | 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience |
title_full | 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience |
title_fullStr | 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience |
title_full_unstemmed | 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience |
title_short | 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience |
title_sort | 3d virtual reality simulation in radiography education: the students' experience |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32800641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.017 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oconnorm 3dvirtualrealitysimulationinradiographyeducationthestudentsexperience AT stowej 3dvirtualrealitysimulationinradiographyeducationthestudentsexperience AT potocnikj 3dvirtualrealitysimulationinradiographyeducationthestudentsexperience AT giannottin 3dvirtualrealitysimulationinradiographyeducationthestudentsexperience AT murphys 3dvirtualrealitysimulationinradiographyeducationthestudentsexperience AT rainfordl 3dvirtualrealitysimulationinradiographyeducationthestudentsexperience |