Cargando…

3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience

INTRODUCTION: Simulation forms a key element of undergraduate Radiography education as it enables students to develop their clinical skills in a safe environment. In this study, an immersive three-dimensional (3D) virtual radiography simulation tool was piloted in an undergraduate Radiography curric...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: O'Connor, M., Stowe, J., Potocnik, J., Giannotti, N., Murphy, S., Rainford, L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32800641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.017
_version_ 1783570318103674880
author O'Connor, M.
Stowe, J.
Potocnik, J.
Giannotti, N.
Murphy, S.
Rainford, L.
author_facet O'Connor, M.
Stowe, J.
Potocnik, J.
Giannotti, N.
Murphy, S.
Rainford, L.
author_sort O'Connor, M.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Simulation forms a key element of undergraduate Radiography education as it enables students to develop their clinical skills in a safe environment. In this study, an immersive three-dimensional (3D) virtual radiography simulation tool was piloted in an undergraduate Radiography curriculum and user feedback retrieved. METHODS: The 3D virtual simulation tool by Virtual Medical Coaching Ltd was introduced to first year radiography students (n = 105). This technology guided students through a comprehensive process of learning anatomy, radiographic positioning and pathology. Students then X-rayed a virtual patient in the VR suite using HTC Vive Pro™ headsets and hand controllers. Instant feedback was provided. An online survey was later disseminated to students to gather user feedback. Thematic and descriptive statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS: A response rate of 79% (n = 83) was achieved. Most respondents (58%) reported enjoying VR simulation, whilst some felt indifferent towards it (27%). Ninety-four percent would recommend this tool to other students. The mean length of time it took for students to feel comfortable using the technology was 60 min (10–240 min). Most respondents (58%) desired more VR access. Students attributed enhanced confidence in the areas of beam collimation (75%), anatomical marker placement (63%), centring of the X-ray tube (64%) and exposure parameter selection (56%) to their VR practice. Many students (55%) advocated the use of VR in formative or low stakes assessments. Issues flagged included technical glitches, inability to palpate patient and lack of constructive feedback. CONCLUSION: Student feedback indicates that 3D virtual radiography simulation is a valuable pedagogical tool in radiography education IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: 3D immersive VR simulation is perceived by radiography students to be a valuable learning resource. VR needs to be strategically implemented into curricula to maximise its benefits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7424334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74243342020-08-13 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience O'Connor, M. Stowe, J. Potocnik, J. Giannotti, N. Murphy, S. Rainford, L. Radiography (Lond) Article INTRODUCTION: Simulation forms a key element of undergraduate Radiography education as it enables students to develop their clinical skills in a safe environment. In this study, an immersive three-dimensional (3D) virtual radiography simulation tool was piloted in an undergraduate Radiography curriculum and user feedback retrieved. METHODS: The 3D virtual simulation tool by Virtual Medical Coaching Ltd was introduced to first year radiography students (n = 105). This technology guided students through a comprehensive process of learning anatomy, radiographic positioning and pathology. Students then X-rayed a virtual patient in the VR suite using HTC Vive Pro™ headsets and hand controllers. Instant feedback was provided. An online survey was later disseminated to students to gather user feedback. Thematic and descriptive statistical analyses were applied. RESULTS: A response rate of 79% (n = 83) was achieved. Most respondents (58%) reported enjoying VR simulation, whilst some felt indifferent towards it (27%). Ninety-four percent would recommend this tool to other students. The mean length of time it took for students to feel comfortable using the technology was 60 min (10–240 min). Most respondents (58%) desired more VR access. Students attributed enhanced confidence in the areas of beam collimation (75%), anatomical marker placement (63%), centring of the X-ray tube (64%) and exposure parameter selection (56%) to their VR practice. Many students (55%) advocated the use of VR in formative or low stakes assessments. Issues flagged included technical glitches, inability to palpate patient and lack of constructive feedback. CONCLUSION: Student feedback indicates that 3D virtual radiography simulation is a valuable pedagogical tool in radiography education IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: 3D immersive VR simulation is perceived by radiography students to be a valuable learning resource. VR needs to be strategically implemented into curricula to maximise its benefits. The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. 2021-02 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7424334/ /pubmed/32800641 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.017 Text en © 2020 The College of Radiographers. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
O'Connor, M.
Stowe, J.
Potocnik, J.
Giannotti, N.
Murphy, S.
Rainford, L.
3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience
title 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience
title_full 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience
title_fullStr 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience
title_full_unstemmed 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience
title_short 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience
title_sort 3d virtual reality simulation in radiography education: the students' experience
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32800641
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2020.07.017
work_keys_str_mv AT oconnorm 3dvirtualrealitysimulationinradiographyeducationthestudentsexperience
AT stowej 3dvirtualrealitysimulationinradiographyeducationthestudentsexperience
AT potocnikj 3dvirtualrealitysimulationinradiographyeducationthestudentsexperience
AT giannottin 3dvirtualrealitysimulationinradiographyeducationthestudentsexperience
AT murphys 3dvirtualrealitysimulationinradiographyeducationthestudentsexperience
AT rainfordl 3dvirtualrealitysimulationinradiographyeducationthestudentsexperience