Cargando…

Fresh and cultured mouse islets differ in their response to nutrient stimulation

Observing different kinetics of nutrient-induced insulin secretion in fresh and cultured islets under the same condition we compared parameters of stimulus secretion coupling in freshly isolated and 22-h-cultured NMRI mouse islets. Stimulation of fresh islets with 30 mM glucose after perifusion with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morsi, Mai, Schulze, Torben, Früh, Eike, Brüning, Dennis, Panten, Uwe, Rustenbeck, Ingo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bioscientifica Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32688335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-20-0289
_version_ 1783570320158883840
author Morsi, Mai
Schulze, Torben
Früh, Eike
Brüning, Dennis
Panten, Uwe
Rustenbeck, Ingo
author_facet Morsi, Mai
Schulze, Torben
Früh, Eike
Brüning, Dennis
Panten, Uwe
Rustenbeck, Ingo
author_sort Morsi, Mai
collection PubMed
description Observing different kinetics of nutrient-induced insulin secretion in fresh and cultured islets under the same condition we compared parameters of stimulus secretion coupling in freshly isolated and 22-h-cultured NMRI mouse islets. Stimulation of fresh islets with 30 mM glucose after perifusion without nutrient gave a continuously ascending secretion rate. In 22-h-cultured islets the same protocol produced a brisk first phase followed by a moderately elevated plateau, a pattern regarded to be typical for mouse islets. This was also the response of cultured islets to the nutrient secretagogue alpha-ketoisocaproic acid, whereas the secretion of fresh islets increased similarly fast but remained strongly elevated. The responses of fresh and cultured islets to purely depolarizing stimuli (tolbutamide or KCl), however, were closely similar. Signs of apoptosis and necrosis were rare in both preparations. In cultured islets, the glucose-induced rise of the cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration started from a lower value and was larger as was the increase of the ATP/ADP ratio. The prestimulatory level of mitochondrial reducing equivalents, expressed as the NAD(P)H/FAD fluorescence ratio, was lower in cultured islets, but increased more strongly than in fresh islets. When culture conditions were modified by replacing RPMI with Krebs–Ringer medium and FCS with BSA, the amount of released insulin varied widely, but the kinetics always showed a predominant first phase. In conclusion, the secretion kinetics of fresh mouse islets is more responsive to variations of nutrient stimulation than cultured islets. The more uniform kinetics of the latter may be caused by a different use of endogenous metabolites.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7424343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Bioscientifica Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74243432020-08-17 Fresh and cultured mouse islets differ in their response to nutrient stimulation Morsi, Mai Schulze, Torben Früh, Eike Brüning, Dennis Panten, Uwe Rustenbeck, Ingo Endocr Connect Research Observing different kinetics of nutrient-induced insulin secretion in fresh and cultured islets under the same condition we compared parameters of stimulus secretion coupling in freshly isolated and 22-h-cultured NMRI mouse islets. Stimulation of fresh islets with 30 mM glucose after perifusion without nutrient gave a continuously ascending secretion rate. In 22-h-cultured islets the same protocol produced a brisk first phase followed by a moderately elevated plateau, a pattern regarded to be typical for mouse islets. This was also the response of cultured islets to the nutrient secretagogue alpha-ketoisocaproic acid, whereas the secretion of fresh islets increased similarly fast but remained strongly elevated. The responses of fresh and cultured islets to purely depolarizing stimuli (tolbutamide or KCl), however, were closely similar. Signs of apoptosis and necrosis were rare in both preparations. In cultured islets, the glucose-induced rise of the cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration started from a lower value and was larger as was the increase of the ATP/ADP ratio. The prestimulatory level of mitochondrial reducing equivalents, expressed as the NAD(P)H/FAD fluorescence ratio, was lower in cultured islets, but increased more strongly than in fresh islets. When culture conditions were modified by replacing RPMI with Krebs–Ringer medium and FCS with BSA, the amount of released insulin varied widely, but the kinetics always showed a predominant first phase. In conclusion, the secretion kinetics of fresh mouse islets is more responsive to variations of nutrient stimulation than cultured islets. The more uniform kinetics of the latter may be caused by a different use of endogenous metabolites. Bioscientifica Ltd 2020-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7424343/ /pubmed/32688335 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-20-0289 Text en © 2020 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Morsi, Mai
Schulze, Torben
Früh, Eike
Brüning, Dennis
Panten, Uwe
Rustenbeck, Ingo
Fresh and cultured mouse islets differ in their response to nutrient stimulation
title Fresh and cultured mouse islets differ in their response to nutrient stimulation
title_full Fresh and cultured mouse islets differ in their response to nutrient stimulation
title_fullStr Fresh and cultured mouse islets differ in their response to nutrient stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Fresh and cultured mouse islets differ in their response to nutrient stimulation
title_short Fresh and cultured mouse islets differ in their response to nutrient stimulation
title_sort fresh and cultured mouse islets differ in their response to nutrient stimulation
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424343/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32688335
http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-20-0289
work_keys_str_mv AT morsimai freshandculturedmouseisletsdifferintheirresponsetonutrientstimulation
AT schulzetorben freshandculturedmouseisletsdifferintheirresponsetonutrientstimulation
AT fruheike freshandculturedmouseisletsdifferintheirresponsetonutrientstimulation
AT bruningdennis freshandculturedmouseisletsdifferintheirresponsetonutrientstimulation
AT pantenuwe freshandculturedmouseisletsdifferintheirresponsetonutrientstimulation
AT rustenbeckingo freshandculturedmouseisletsdifferintheirresponsetonutrientstimulation