Cargando…
Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions—A review of the literature
AIM: To identify and synthesize qualitative evaluation methods used in nursing interventions. DESIGN: A systematic qualitative review with a content analysis. Four databases were used: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL using pre‐defined terms. The included papers were published from 2014–2018. ME...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.519 |
_version_ | 1783570338694561792 |
---|---|
author | Rørtveit, Kristine Saetre Hansen, Britt Joa, Inge Lode, Kirsten Severinsson, Elisabeth |
author_facet | Rørtveit, Kristine Saetre Hansen, Britt Joa, Inge Lode, Kirsten Severinsson, Elisabeth |
author_sort | Rørtveit, Kristine |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: To identify and synthesize qualitative evaluation methods used in nursing interventions. DESIGN: A systematic qualitative review with a content analysis. Four databases were used: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL using pre‐defined terms. The included papers were published from 2014–2018. METHODS: We followed the guidelines of Dixon‐Woods et al., Sandelowski and Barroso, the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist and The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research Approach. RESULTS: Of 103 papers, 15 were eligible for inclusion. The main theme Challenging complexity by evaluating qualitatively described processes and characteristics of qualitative evaluation. Two analytic themes emerged: Evaluating the implementation process and Evaluating improvements brought about by the programme. CONCLUSION: Different qualitative evaluation methods in nursing are a way of documenting knowledge that is difficult to illuminate in natural settings and make an important contribution when determining the pros and cons of an intervention. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7424442 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74244422020-08-13 Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions—A review of the literature Rørtveit, Kristine Saetre Hansen, Britt Joa, Inge Lode, Kirsten Severinsson, Elisabeth Nurs Open Review Articles AIM: To identify and synthesize qualitative evaluation methods used in nursing interventions. DESIGN: A systematic qualitative review with a content analysis. Four databases were used: MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase and CINAHL using pre‐defined terms. The included papers were published from 2014–2018. METHODS: We followed the guidelines of Dixon‐Woods et al., Sandelowski and Barroso, the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme qualitative checklist and The Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative Research Approach. RESULTS: Of 103 papers, 15 were eligible for inclusion. The main theme Challenging complexity by evaluating qualitatively described processes and characteristics of qualitative evaluation. Two analytic themes emerged: Evaluating the implementation process and Evaluating improvements brought about by the programme. CONCLUSION: Different qualitative evaluation methods in nursing are a way of documenting knowledge that is difficult to illuminate in natural settings and make an important contribution when determining the pros and cons of an intervention. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-06-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7424442/ /pubmed/32802349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.519 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Nursing Open published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Review Articles Rørtveit, Kristine Saetre Hansen, Britt Joa, Inge Lode, Kirsten Severinsson, Elisabeth Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions—A review of the literature |
title | Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions—A review of the literature |
title_full | Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions—A review of the literature |
title_fullStr | Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions—A review of the literature |
title_full_unstemmed | Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions—A review of the literature |
title_short | Qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions—A review of the literature |
title_sort | qualitative evaluation in nursing interventions—a review of the literature |
topic | Review Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424442/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32802349 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/nop2.519 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rørtveitkristine qualitativeevaluationinnursinginterventionsareviewoftheliterature AT saetrehansenbritt qualitativeevaluationinnursinginterventionsareviewoftheliterature AT joainge qualitativeevaluationinnursinginterventionsareviewoftheliterature AT lodekirsten qualitativeevaluationinnursinginterventionsareviewoftheliterature AT severinssonelisabeth qualitativeevaluationinnursinginterventionsareviewoftheliterature |