Cargando…

Evidence Regarding Automatic Processing Computerized Tasks Designed For Health Interventions in Real-World Settings Among Adults: Systematic Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Dual process theories propose that the brain uses 2 types of thinking to influence behavior: automatic processing and reflective processing. Automatic processing is fast, immediate, nonconscious, and unintentional, whereas reflective processing focuses on logical reasoning, and it is slo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jayasinghe, Harshani, Short, Camille E, Braunack-Mayer, Annette, Merkin, Ashley, Hume, Clare
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499213
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17915
_version_ 1783570348722094080
author Jayasinghe, Harshani
Short, Camille E
Braunack-Mayer, Annette
Merkin, Ashley
Hume, Clare
author_facet Jayasinghe, Harshani
Short, Camille E
Braunack-Mayer, Annette
Merkin, Ashley
Hume, Clare
author_sort Jayasinghe, Harshani
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Dual process theories propose that the brain uses 2 types of thinking to influence behavior: automatic processing and reflective processing. Automatic processing is fast, immediate, nonconscious, and unintentional, whereas reflective processing focuses on logical reasoning, and it is slow, step by step, and intentional. Most digital psychological health interventions tend to solely target the reflective system, although the automatic processing pathway can have strong influences on behavior. Laboratory-based research has highlighted that automatic processing tasks can create behavior change; however, there are substantial gaps in the field on the design, implementation, and delivery of automatic processing tasks in real-world settings. It is important to identify and summarize the existing literature in this area to inform the translation of laboratory-based research to real-world settings. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to explore the effectiveness of automatic training tasks, types of training tasks commonly used, mode of delivery, and impacts of gamification on automatic processing tasks designed for digital psychological health interventions in real-world settings among adults. METHODS: The scoping review methodology proposed by Arskey and O’Malley and Colquhoun was applied. A scoping review was chosen because of the novelty of the digital automatic processing field and to encompass a broad review of the existing evidence base. Electronic databases and gray literature databases were searched with the search terms “automatic processing,” “computerised technologies,” “health intervention,” “real-world,” and “adults” and synonyms of these words. The search was up to date until September 2018. A manual search was also completed on the reference lists of the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies met all inclusion criteria. There was a wide variety of health conditions targeted, with the most prevalent being alcohol abuse followed by social anxiety. Attention bias modification tasks were the most prevalent type of automatic processing task, and the majority of tasks were most commonly delivered over the web via a personal computer. Of the 14 studies included in the review, 8 demonstrated significant changes to automatic processes and 4 demonstrated significant behavioral changes as a result of changed automatic processes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first review to synthesize the evidence on automatic processing tasks in real-world settings targeting adults. This review has highlighted promising, albeit limited, research demonstrating that automatic processing tasks may be used effectively in a real-world setting to influence behavior change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7424486
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74244862020-08-20 Evidence Regarding Automatic Processing Computerized Tasks Designed For Health Interventions in Real-World Settings Among Adults: Systematic Scoping Review Jayasinghe, Harshani Short, Camille E Braunack-Mayer, Annette Merkin, Ashley Hume, Clare J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Dual process theories propose that the brain uses 2 types of thinking to influence behavior: automatic processing and reflective processing. Automatic processing is fast, immediate, nonconscious, and unintentional, whereas reflective processing focuses on logical reasoning, and it is slow, step by step, and intentional. Most digital psychological health interventions tend to solely target the reflective system, although the automatic processing pathway can have strong influences on behavior. Laboratory-based research has highlighted that automatic processing tasks can create behavior change; however, there are substantial gaps in the field on the design, implementation, and delivery of automatic processing tasks in real-world settings. It is important to identify and summarize the existing literature in this area to inform the translation of laboratory-based research to real-world settings. OBJECTIVE: This scoping review aims to explore the effectiveness of automatic training tasks, types of training tasks commonly used, mode of delivery, and impacts of gamification on automatic processing tasks designed for digital psychological health interventions in real-world settings among adults. METHODS: The scoping review methodology proposed by Arskey and O’Malley and Colquhoun was applied. A scoping review was chosen because of the novelty of the digital automatic processing field and to encompass a broad review of the existing evidence base. Electronic databases and gray literature databases were searched with the search terms “automatic processing,” “computerised technologies,” “health intervention,” “real-world,” and “adults” and synonyms of these words. The search was up to date until September 2018. A manual search was also completed on the reference lists of the included studies. RESULTS: A total of 14 studies met all inclusion criteria. There was a wide variety of health conditions targeted, with the most prevalent being alcohol abuse followed by social anxiety. Attention bias modification tasks were the most prevalent type of automatic processing task, and the majority of tasks were most commonly delivered over the web via a personal computer. Of the 14 studies included in the review, 8 demonstrated significant changes to automatic processes and 4 demonstrated significant behavioral changes as a result of changed automatic processes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first review to synthesize the evidence on automatic processing tasks in real-world settings targeting adults. This review has highlighted promising, albeit limited, research demonstrating that automatic processing tasks may be used effectively in a real-world setting to influence behavior change. JMIR Publications 2020-07-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7424486/ /pubmed/32499213 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17915 Text en ©Harshani Jayasinghe, Camille E Short, Annette Braunack-Mayer, Ashley Merkin, Clare Hume. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 29.07.2020. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Jayasinghe, Harshani
Short, Camille E
Braunack-Mayer, Annette
Merkin, Ashley
Hume, Clare
Evidence Regarding Automatic Processing Computerized Tasks Designed For Health Interventions in Real-World Settings Among Adults: Systematic Scoping Review
title Evidence Regarding Automatic Processing Computerized Tasks Designed For Health Interventions in Real-World Settings Among Adults: Systematic Scoping Review
title_full Evidence Regarding Automatic Processing Computerized Tasks Designed For Health Interventions in Real-World Settings Among Adults: Systematic Scoping Review
title_fullStr Evidence Regarding Automatic Processing Computerized Tasks Designed For Health Interventions in Real-World Settings Among Adults: Systematic Scoping Review
title_full_unstemmed Evidence Regarding Automatic Processing Computerized Tasks Designed For Health Interventions in Real-World Settings Among Adults: Systematic Scoping Review
title_short Evidence Regarding Automatic Processing Computerized Tasks Designed For Health Interventions in Real-World Settings Among Adults: Systematic Scoping Review
title_sort evidence regarding automatic processing computerized tasks designed for health interventions in real-world settings among adults: systematic scoping review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424486/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32499213
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/17915
work_keys_str_mv AT jayasingheharshani evidenceregardingautomaticprocessingcomputerizedtasksdesignedforhealthinterventionsinrealworldsettingsamongadultssystematicscopingreview
AT shortcamillee evidenceregardingautomaticprocessingcomputerizedtasksdesignedforhealthinterventionsinrealworldsettingsamongadultssystematicscopingreview
AT braunackmayerannette evidenceregardingautomaticprocessingcomputerizedtasksdesignedforhealthinterventionsinrealworldsettingsamongadultssystematicscopingreview
AT merkinashley evidenceregardingautomaticprocessingcomputerizedtasksdesignedforhealthinterventionsinrealworldsettingsamongadultssystematicscopingreview
AT humeclare evidenceregardingautomaticprocessingcomputerizedtasksdesignedforhealthinterventionsinrealworldsettingsamongadultssystematicscopingreview