Cargando…

Patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials?

BACKGROUND: Patient skepticism concerning medical innovations can have major consequences for current public health and may threaten future progress, which greatly relies on clinical research. The primary objective of this study is to determine the variables associated with patient acceptation or re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pahus, Laurie, Suehs, Carey Meredith, Halimi, Laurence, Bourdin, Arnaud, Chanez, Pascal, Jaffuel, Dany, Marciano, Julie, Gamez, Anne-Sophie, Vachier, Isabelle, Molinari, Nicolas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32791969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00509-y
_version_ 1783570361805176832
author Pahus, Laurie
Suehs, Carey Meredith
Halimi, Laurence
Bourdin, Arnaud
Chanez, Pascal
Jaffuel, Dany
Marciano, Julie
Gamez, Anne-Sophie
Vachier, Isabelle
Molinari, Nicolas
author_facet Pahus, Laurie
Suehs, Carey Meredith
Halimi, Laurence
Bourdin, Arnaud
Chanez, Pascal
Jaffuel, Dany
Marciano, Julie
Gamez, Anne-Sophie
Vachier, Isabelle
Molinari, Nicolas
author_sort Pahus, Laurie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patient skepticism concerning medical innovations can have major consequences for current public health and may threaten future progress, which greatly relies on clinical research. The primary objective of this study is to determine the variables associated with patient acceptation or refusal to participate in clinical research. Specifically, we sought to evaluate if distrust in pharmaceutical companies and associated psychosocial factors could represent a recruitment bias in clinical trials and thus threaten the applicability of their results. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter survey consisted in the administration of a self-questionnaire to patients during a pulmonology consultation. The 1025 questionnaires distributed collected demographics, socio-professional and basic health literacy characteristics. Patients were asked to rank their level of trust for pharmaceutical companies and indicate their willingness to participate in different categories of research (pre or post marketing, sponsored by an academic institution or pharmaceutical company). Logistic regression was used to determine factors contributing to “trust” versus “distrust” group membership and willingness to participate in each category of research. RESULTS: One thousand patients completed the survey, corresponding to a response rate of 97.5%. Data from 838 patients were analyzed in this study. 48.3% of respondents declared that they trusted pharmaceutical companies, while 35.5% declared distrust. Being female (p = 0.042), inactive in the employment market(p = 0.007), and not-knowing the name of one’s disease(p = 0.010) are factors related to declared distrust. Distrust-group membership is associated with unwillingness to participate in certain categories of trials such as pre-marketing and industry-sponsored trials. CONCLUSION: Distrust in pharmaceutical companies is associated with a specific patient profile and with refusal to participate in certain subcategories of trials. This potential recruitment bias may explain the under-representation of certain categories of patients such as women in pre-marketing drug trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7424561
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74245612020-08-13 Patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials? Pahus, Laurie Suehs, Carey Meredith Halimi, Laurence Bourdin, Arnaud Chanez, Pascal Jaffuel, Dany Marciano, Julie Gamez, Anne-Sophie Vachier, Isabelle Molinari, Nicolas BMC Med Ethics Research Article BACKGROUND: Patient skepticism concerning medical innovations can have major consequences for current public health and may threaten future progress, which greatly relies on clinical research. The primary objective of this study is to determine the variables associated with patient acceptation or refusal to participate in clinical research. Specifically, we sought to evaluate if distrust in pharmaceutical companies and associated psychosocial factors could represent a recruitment bias in clinical trials and thus threaten the applicability of their results. METHODS: This prospective, multicenter survey consisted in the administration of a self-questionnaire to patients during a pulmonology consultation. The 1025 questionnaires distributed collected demographics, socio-professional and basic health literacy characteristics. Patients were asked to rank their level of trust for pharmaceutical companies and indicate their willingness to participate in different categories of research (pre or post marketing, sponsored by an academic institution or pharmaceutical company). Logistic regression was used to determine factors contributing to “trust” versus “distrust” group membership and willingness to participate in each category of research. RESULTS: One thousand patients completed the survey, corresponding to a response rate of 97.5%. Data from 838 patients were analyzed in this study. 48.3% of respondents declared that they trusted pharmaceutical companies, while 35.5% declared distrust. Being female (p = 0.042), inactive in the employment market(p = 0.007), and not-knowing the name of one’s disease(p = 0.010) are factors related to declared distrust. Distrust-group membership is associated with unwillingness to participate in certain categories of trials such as pre-marketing and industry-sponsored trials. CONCLUSION: Distrust in pharmaceutical companies is associated with a specific patient profile and with refusal to participate in certain subcategories of trials. This potential recruitment bias may explain the under-representation of certain categories of patients such as women in pre-marketing drug trials. BioMed Central 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7424561/ /pubmed/32791969 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00509-y Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Pahus, Laurie
Suehs, Carey Meredith
Halimi, Laurence
Bourdin, Arnaud
Chanez, Pascal
Jaffuel, Dany
Marciano, Julie
Gamez, Anne-Sophie
Vachier, Isabelle
Molinari, Nicolas
Patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials?
title Patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials?
title_full Patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials?
title_fullStr Patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials?
title_full_unstemmed Patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials?
title_short Patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials?
title_sort patient distrust in pharmaceutical companies: an explanation for women under-representation in respiratory clinical trials?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424561/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32791969
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-00509-y
work_keys_str_mv AT pahuslaurie patientdistrustinpharmaceuticalcompaniesanexplanationforwomenunderrepresentationinrespiratoryclinicaltrials
AT suehscareymeredith patientdistrustinpharmaceuticalcompaniesanexplanationforwomenunderrepresentationinrespiratoryclinicaltrials
AT halimilaurence patientdistrustinpharmaceuticalcompaniesanexplanationforwomenunderrepresentationinrespiratoryclinicaltrials
AT bourdinarnaud patientdistrustinpharmaceuticalcompaniesanexplanationforwomenunderrepresentationinrespiratoryclinicaltrials
AT chanezpascal patientdistrustinpharmaceuticalcompaniesanexplanationforwomenunderrepresentationinrespiratoryclinicaltrials
AT jaffueldany patientdistrustinpharmaceuticalcompaniesanexplanationforwomenunderrepresentationinrespiratoryclinicaltrials
AT marcianojulie patientdistrustinpharmaceuticalcompaniesanexplanationforwomenunderrepresentationinrespiratoryclinicaltrials
AT gamezannesophie patientdistrustinpharmaceuticalcompaniesanexplanationforwomenunderrepresentationinrespiratoryclinicaltrials
AT vachierisabelle patientdistrustinpharmaceuticalcompaniesanexplanationforwomenunderrepresentationinrespiratoryclinicaltrials
AT molinarinicolas patientdistrustinpharmaceuticalcompaniesanexplanationforwomenunderrepresentationinrespiratoryclinicaltrials