Cargando…

Patterns of hybridization and cryptic introgression among one- and four-needled pinyon pines

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pinyon pine hybridization is widely acknowledged, but the frequency of and contributors to such interspecific mating remain largely unstudied. Pinus quadrifolia has three to four needles per fascicle, suggesting that it is a result of hybridization between the five-needled P. ju...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buck, Ryan, Hyasat, Sandra, Hossfeld, Alice, Flores-Rentería, Lluvia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32222765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa045
_version_ 1783570389694152704
author Buck, Ryan
Hyasat, Sandra
Hossfeld, Alice
Flores-Rentería, Lluvia
author_facet Buck, Ryan
Hyasat, Sandra
Hossfeld, Alice
Flores-Rentería, Lluvia
author_sort Buck, Ryan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pinyon pine hybridization is widely acknowledged, but the frequency of and contributors to such interspecific mating remain largely unstudied. Pinus quadrifolia has three to four needles per fascicle, suggesting that it is a result of hybridization between the five-needled P. juarezensis and the single-needled P. monophylla. In this study we address the taxonomic validity of P. juarezensis, the hybrid origin of P. quadrifolia and the presence of hybridization and intermediate morphology as a result of interspecific hybridization in this complex. METHODS: We address these questions by combining a genomic and morphological approach. We generated 1868 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to detect genetic clusters using principal co-ordinates analyis, discriminant analysis of principal components, fastSTRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE analyses, and performed a morphological analysis of the leaves. KEY RESULTS: We found that the five-needled pinyons did not differ genetically from the four-needled P. quadrifolia, reducing the status of P. juarezensis to P. quadrifolia. We also found no evidence that P. quadrifolia is of hybrid origin from P. juarezensis × P. monophylla but is instead a genetically distinct species with natural needle number variation that has yet to be explained. Hybridization does occur in this complex, but mostly between P. quadrifolia and P. californiarum, and less commonly between P. quadrifolia and P. monophylla. Interestingly, some hybrid derivatives were detected between both single-needled taxa, P. monophylla and P. californiarum, a hybrid combination that has not yet been proposed. Hybrids have intermediate morphology when they have similar genetic contributions from both parental species; however, when one parent contributes more, hybrid derivatives resemble the parent with higher genetic contribution, resulting in cryptic introgression. CONCLUSIONS: Our detailed sampling across the distribution of this complex allows us to describe the patterns of hybridization among these taxa, resolves an ancient taxonomic conflict and provides insights into the challenges of exclusively using morphological traits when identifying these taxa with cryptic hybridization and variable morphology.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7424738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74247382020-08-17 Patterns of hybridization and cryptic introgression among one- and four-needled pinyon pines Buck, Ryan Hyasat, Sandra Hossfeld, Alice Flores-Rentería, Lluvia Ann Bot Original Articles BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pinyon pine hybridization is widely acknowledged, but the frequency of and contributors to such interspecific mating remain largely unstudied. Pinus quadrifolia has three to four needles per fascicle, suggesting that it is a result of hybridization between the five-needled P. juarezensis and the single-needled P. monophylla. In this study we address the taxonomic validity of P. juarezensis, the hybrid origin of P. quadrifolia and the presence of hybridization and intermediate morphology as a result of interspecific hybridization in this complex. METHODS: We address these questions by combining a genomic and morphological approach. We generated 1868 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to detect genetic clusters using principal co-ordinates analyis, discriminant analysis of principal components, fastSTRUCTURE and ADMIXTURE analyses, and performed a morphological analysis of the leaves. KEY RESULTS: We found that the five-needled pinyons did not differ genetically from the four-needled P. quadrifolia, reducing the status of P. juarezensis to P. quadrifolia. We also found no evidence that P. quadrifolia is of hybrid origin from P. juarezensis × P. monophylla but is instead a genetically distinct species with natural needle number variation that has yet to be explained. Hybridization does occur in this complex, but mostly between P. quadrifolia and P. californiarum, and less commonly between P. quadrifolia and P. monophylla. Interestingly, some hybrid derivatives were detected between both single-needled taxa, P. monophylla and P. californiarum, a hybrid combination that has not yet been proposed. Hybrids have intermediate morphology when they have similar genetic contributions from both parental species; however, when one parent contributes more, hybrid derivatives resemble the parent with higher genetic contribution, resulting in cryptic introgression. CONCLUSIONS: Our detailed sampling across the distribution of this complex allows us to describe the patterns of hybridization among these taxa, resolves an ancient taxonomic conflict and provides insights into the challenges of exclusively using morphological traits when identifying these taxa with cryptic hybridization and variable morphology. Oxford University Press 2020-08 2020-03-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7424738/ /pubmed/32222765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa045 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Buck, Ryan
Hyasat, Sandra
Hossfeld, Alice
Flores-Rentería, Lluvia
Patterns of hybridization and cryptic introgression among one- and four-needled pinyon pines
title Patterns of hybridization and cryptic introgression among one- and four-needled pinyon pines
title_full Patterns of hybridization and cryptic introgression among one- and four-needled pinyon pines
title_fullStr Patterns of hybridization and cryptic introgression among one- and four-needled pinyon pines
title_full_unstemmed Patterns of hybridization and cryptic introgression among one- and four-needled pinyon pines
title_short Patterns of hybridization and cryptic introgression among one- and four-needled pinyon pines
title_sort patterns of hybridization and cryptic introgression among one- and four-needled pinyon pines
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32222765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcaa045
work_keys_str_mv AT buckryan patternsofhybridizationandcrypticintrogressionamongoneandfourneedledpinyonpines
AT hyasatsandra patternsofhybridizationandcrypticintrogressionamongoneandfourneedledpinyonpines
AT hossfeldalice patternsofhybridizationandcrypticintrogressionamongoneandfourneedledpinyonpines
AT floresrenterialluvia patternsofhybridizationandcrypticintrogressionamongoneandfourneedledpinyonpines