Cargando…
Reproducibility of a prediabetes classification in a contemporary population
AIMS: To assess whether meeting both fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c criteria for prediabetes in people at high risk indicates with near certainty the presence of dysglycemia on repeat testing. METHODS: Observational study using data from Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) study. HbA1c, FPG...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32812912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2020.100031 |
_version_ | 1783570401968783360 |
---|---|
author | Chadha, Chhavi Pittas, Anastassios G. Lary, Christine W. Knowler, William C. Chatterjee, Ranee Phillips, Lawrence S. Aroda, Vanita R. Lewis, Michael R. Pratley, Richard Staten, Myrlene A. Nelson, Jason Rasouli, Neda Brodsky, Irwin |
author_facet | Chadha, Chhavi Pittas, Anastassios G. Lary, Christine W. Knowler, William C. Chatterjee, Ranee Phillips, Lawrence S. Aroda, Vanita R. Lewis, Michael R. Pratley, Richard Staten, Myrlene A. Nelson, Jason Rasouli, Neda Brodsky, Irwin |
author_sort | Chadha, Chhavi |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: To assess whether meeting both fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c criteria for prediabetes in people at high risk indicates with near certainty the presence of dysglycemia on repeat testing. METHODS: Observational study using data from Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) study. HbA1c, FPG were measured at screening visit 1; FPG, HbA1c and 2 h plasma glucose (2hPG) measured at screening visit 2 (a median of 21 days later); participants classified as having normal glucose regulation (all 3 tests in normal range), prediabetes or diabetes (at least 1 of 3 tests in diabetes range). A predictive model was developed to estimate the probability of confirming dysglycemia and for detecting diabetes at screening visit 2 based on values of FPG and HbA1c at screening visit 1. RESULTS: Of 1271 participants who met both FPG and HbA1c criteria for prediabetes at screening visit 1, 98.6% exhibited dysglycemia (defined as prediabetes or diabetes) on repeat testing (84.5% were classified as having prediabetes, 14.1% were reclassified as having diabetes). Of those with diabetes, 62.6% were identified by 2hPG alone. CONCLUSIONS: Combined measurement of FPG and HbA1c is a reliable and reproducible measure to identify presence of dysglycemia among people at high risk. A prediction model is provided to help clinicians decide whether an oral glucose tolerance test will provide value in detecting diabetes based on the 2hPG criterion. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7424833 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74248332020-08-17 Reproducibility of a prediabetes classification in a contemporary population Chadha, Chhavi Pittas, Anastassios G. Lary, Christine W. Knowler, William C. Chatterjee, Ranee Phillips, Lawrence S. Aroda, Vanita R. Lewis, Michael R. Pratley, Richard Staten, Myrlene A. Nelson, Jason Rasouli, Neda Brodsky, Irwin Metabol Open Original Research Paper AIMS: To assess whether meeting both fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and HbA1c criteria for prediabetes in people at high risk indicates with near certainty the presence of dysglycemia on repeat testing. METHODS: Observational study using data from Vitamin D and Type 2 Diabetes (D2d) study. HbA1c, FPG were measured at screening visit 1; FPG, HbA1c and 2 h plasma glucose (2hPG) measured at screening visit 2 (a median of 21 days later); participants classified as having normal glucose regulation (all 3 tests in normal range), prediabetes or diabetes (at least 1 of 3 tests in diabetes range). A predictive model was developed to estimate the probability of confirming dysglycemia and for detecting diabetes at screening visit 2 based on values of FPG and HbA1c at screening visit 1. RESULTS: Of 1271 participants who met both FPG and HbA1c criteria for prediabetes at screening visit 1, 98.6% exhibited dysglycemia (defined as prediabetes or diabetes) on repeat testing (84.5% were classified as having prediabetes, 14.1% were reclassified as having diabetes). Of those with diabetes, 62.6% were identified by 2hPG alone. CONCLUSIONS: Combined measurement of FPG and HbA1c is a reliable and reproducible measure to identify presence of dysglycemia among people at high risk. A prediction model is provided to help clinicians decide whether an oral glucose tolerance test will provide value in detecting diabetes based on the 2hPG criterion. Elsevier 2020-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7424833/ /pubmed/32812912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2020.100031 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Paper Chadha, Chhavi Pittas, Anastassios G. Lary, Christine W. Knowler, William C. Chatterjee, Ranee Phillips, Lawrence S. Aroda, Vanita R. Lewis, Michael R. Pratley, Richard Staten, Myrlene A. Nelson, Jason Rasouli, Neda Brodsky, Irwin Reproducibility of a prediabetes classification in a contemporary population |
title | Reproducibility of a prediabetes classification in a contemporary population |
title_full | Reproducibility of a prediabetes classification in a contemporary population |
title_fullStr | Reproducibility of a prediabetes classification in a contemporary population |
title_full_unstemmed | Reproducibility of a prediabetes classification in a contemporary population |
title_short | Reproducibility of a prediabetes classification in a contemporary population |
title_sort | reproducibility of a prediabetes classification in a contemporary population |
topic | Original Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7424833/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32812912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.metop.2020.100031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chadhachhavi reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT pittasanastassiosg reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT larychristinew reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT knowlerwilliamc reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT chatterjeeranee reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT phillipslawrences reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT arodavanitar reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT lewismichaelr reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT pratleyrichard reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT statenmyrlenea reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT nelsonjason reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT rasoulineda reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT brodskyirwin reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation AT reproducibilityofaprediabetesclassificationinacontemporarypopulation |