Cargando…
When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an acceptable treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Traditional transplant criteria aim at best utilization of donor organs with low risk of post transplant recurrence. In LDLT, long term recurrence free survival (RFS) of 50% is...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32787864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07238-w |
_version_ | 1783570440438939648 |
---|---|
author | Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez Qureshi, Ammal Imran Tahir, Rizmi Dar, Faisal Saud Khan, Nusrat Yar Zia, Haseeb Haider Riyaz, Shahzad Rana, Atif |
author_facet | Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez Qureshi, Ammal Imran Tahir, Rizmi Dar, Faisal Saud Khan, Nusrat Yar Zia, Haseeb Haider Riyaz, Shahzad Rana, Atif |
author_sort | Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an acceptable treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Traditional transplant criteria aim at best utilization of donor organs with low risk of post transplant recurrence. In LDLT, long term recurrence free survival (RFS) of 50% is considered acceptable. The objective of the current study was to determine preoperative factors associated with high recurrence rates in LDLT. METHODS: Between April 2012 and December 2019, 898 LDLTs were performed at our center. Out of these, 242 were confirmed to have HCC on explant histopathology. We looked at preoperative factors associated with ≤ 50%RFS at 4 years. For survival analysis, Kaplan Meier curves were used and Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of recurrence. RESULTS: Median AFP was 14.4(0.7–11,326.7) ng/ml. Median tumor size was 2.8(range = 0.1–11) cm and tumor number was 2(range = 1–15). On multivariate analysis, AFP > 600 ng/ml [HR:6, CI: 1.9–18.4, P = 0.002] and microvascular invasion (MVI) [HR:5.8, CI: 2.5–13.4, P < 0.001] were independent predictors of 4 year RFS ≤ 50%. When AFP was > 600 ng/ml, MVI was seen in 88.9% tumors with poor grade and 75% of tumors outside University of California San Francisco criteria. Estimated 4 year RFS was 78% for the entire cohort. When AFP was < 600 ng/ml, 4 year RFS for well-moderate and poor grade tumors was 88 and 73%. With AFP > 600 ng/ml, RFS was 53% and 0 with well-moderate and poor grade tumors respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with AFP < 600 ng/ml have acceptable outcomes after LDLT. In patients with AFP > 600 ng/ml, a preoperative biopsy to rule out poor differentiation should be considered for patient selection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7425141 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74251412020-08-16 When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez Qureshi, Ammal Imran Tahir, Rizmi Dar, Faisal Saud Khan, Nusrat Yar Zia, Haseeb Haider Riyaz, Shahzad Rana, Atif BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an acceptable treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Traditional transplant criteria aim at best utilization of donor organs with low risk of post transplant recurrence. In LDLT, long term recurrence free survival (RFS) of 50% is considered acceptable. The objective of the current study was to determine preoperative factors associated with high recurrence rates in LDLT. METHODS: Between April 2012 and December 2019, 898 LDLTs were performed at our center. Out of these, 242 were confirmed to have HCC on explant histopathology. We looked at preoperative factors associated with ≤ 50%RFS at 4 years. For survival analysis, Kaplan Meier curves were used and Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of recurrence. RESULTS: Median AFP was 14.4(0.7–11,326.7) ng/ml. Median tumor size was 2.8(range = 0.1–11) cm and tumor number was 2(range = 1–15). On multivariate analysis, AFP > 600 ng/ml [HR:6, CI: 1.9–18.4, P = 0.002] and microvascular invasion (MVI) [HR:5.8, CI: 2.5–13.4, P < 0.001] were independent predictors of 4 year RFS ≤ 50%. When AFP was > 600 ng/ml, MVI was seen in 88.9% tumors with poor grade and 75% of tumors outside University of California San Francisco criteria. Estimated 4 year RFS was 78% for the entire cohort. When AFP was < 600 ng/ml, 4 year RFS for well-moderate and poor grade tumors was 88 and 73%. With AFP > 600 ng/ml, RFS was 53% and 0 with well-moderate and poor grade tumors respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with AFP < 600 ng/ml have acceptable outcomes after LDLT. In patients with AFP > 600 ng/ml, a preoperative biopsy to rule out poor differentiation should be considered for patient selection. BioMed Central 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7425141/ /pubmed/32787864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07238-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez Qureshi, Ammal Imran Tahir, Rizmi Dar, Faisal Saud Khan, Nusrat Yar Zia, Haseeb Haider Riyaz, Shahzad Rana, Atif When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma |
title | When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_full | When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_fullStr | When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_short | When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma |
title_sort | when to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425141/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32787864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07238-w |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bhattiabubakarhafeez whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT qureshiammalimran whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT tahirrizmi whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT darfaisalsaud whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT khannusratyar whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT ziahaseebhaider whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT riyazshahzad whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma AT ranaatif whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma |