Cargando…

When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an acceptable treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Traditional transplant criteria aim at best utilization of donor organs with low risk of post transplant recurrence. In LDLT, long term recurrence free survival (RFS) of 50% is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez, Qureshi, Ammal Imran, Tahir, Rizmi, Dar, Faisal Saud, Khan, Nusrat Yar, Zia, Haseeb Haider, Riyaz, Shahzad, Rana, Atif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32787864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07238-w
_version_ 1783570440438939648
author Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez
Qureshi, Ammal Imran
Tahir, Rizmi
Dar, Faisal Saud
Khan, Nusrat Yar
Zia, Haseeb Haider
Riyaz, Shahzad
Rana, Atif
author_facet Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez
Qureshi, Ammal Imran
Tahir, Rizmi
Dar, Faisal Saud
Khan, Nusrat Yar
Zia, Haseeb Haider
Riyaz, Shahzad
Rana, Atif
author_sort Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an acceptable treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Traditional transplant criteria aim at best utilization of donor organs with low risk of post transplant recurrence. In LDLT, long term recurrence free survival (RFS) of 50% is considered acceptable. The objective of the current study was to determine preoperative factors associated with high recurrence rates in LDLT. METHODS: Between April 2012 and December 2019, 898 LDLTs were performed at our center. Out of these, 242 were confirmed to have HCC on explant histopathology. We looked at preoperative factors associated with ≤ 50%RFS at 4 years. For survival analysis, Kaplan Meier curves were used and Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of recurrence. RESULTS: Median AFP was 14.4(0.7–11,326.7) ng/ml. Median tumor size was 2.8(range = 0.1–11) cm and tumor number was 2(range = 1–15). On multivariate analysis, AFP > 600 ng/ml [HR:6, CI: 1.9–18.4, P = 0.002] and microvascular invasion (MVI) [HR:5.8, CI: 2.5–13.4, P <  0.001] were independent predictors of 4 year RFS ≤ 50%. When AFP was > 600 ng/ml, MVI was seen in 88.9% tumors with poor grade and 75% of tumors outside University of California San Francisco criteria. Estimated 4 year RFS was 78% for the entire cohort. When AFP was < 600 ng/ml, 4 year RFS for well-moderate and poor grade tumors was 88 and 73%. With AFP > 600 ng/ml, RFS was 53% and 0 with well-moderate and poor grade tumors respectively (P <  0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with AFP < 600 ng/ml have acceptable outcomes after LDLT. In patients with AFP > 600 ng/ml, a preoperative biopsy to rule out poor differentiation should be considered for patient selection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7425141
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74251412020-08-16 When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez Qureshi, Ammal Imran Tahir, Rizmi Dar, Faisal Saud Khan, Nusrat Yar Zia, Haseeb Haider Riyaz, Shahzad Rana, Atif BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is an acceptable treatment option for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Traditional transplant criteria aim at best utilization of donor organs with low risk of post transplant recurrence. In LDLT, long term recurrence free survival (RFS) of 50% is considered acceptable. The objective of the current study was to determine preoperative factors associated with high recurrence rates in LDLT. METHODS: Between April 2012 and December 2019, 898 LDLTs were performed at our center. Out of these, 242 were confirmed to have HCC on explant histopathology. We looked at preoperative factors associated with ≤ 50%RFS at 4 years. For survival analysis, Kaplan Meier curves were used and Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of recurrence. RESULTS: Median AFP was 14.4(0.7–11,326.7) ng/ml. Median tumor size was 2.8(range = 0.1–11) cm and tumor number was 2(range = 1–15). On multivariate analysis, AFP > 600 ng/ml [HR:6, CI: 1.9–18.4, P = 0.002] and microvascular invasion (MVI) [HR:5.8, CI: 2.5–13.4, P <  0.001] were independent predictors of 4 year RFS ≤ 50%. When AFP was > 600 ng/ml, MVI was seen in 88.9% tumors with poor grade and 75% of tumors outside University of California San Francisco criteria. Estimated 4 year RFS was 78% for the entire cohort. When AFP was < 600 ng/ml, 4 year RFS for well-moderate and poor grade tumors was 88 and 73%. With AFP > 600 ng/ml, RFS was 53% and 0 with well-moderate and poor grade tumors respectively (P <  0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients with AFP < 600 ng/ml have acceptable outcomes after LDLT. In patients with AFP > 600 ng/ml, a preoperative biopsy to rule out poor differentiation should be considered for patient selection. BioMed Central 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7425141/ /pubmed/32787864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07238-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bhatti, Abu Bakar Hafeez
Qureshi, Ammal Imran
Tahir, Rizmi
Dar, Faisal Saud
Khan, Nusrat Yar
Zia, Haseeb Haider
Riyaz, Shahzad
Rana, Atif
When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
title When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
title_fullStr When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
title_short When to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
title_sort when to call it off: defining transplant candidacy limits in liver donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425141/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32787864
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-020-07238-w
work_keys_str_mv AT bhattiabubakarhafeez whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT qureshiammalimran whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT tahirrizmi whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT darfaisalsaud whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT khannusratyar whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT ziahaseebhaider whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT riyazshahzad whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma
AT ranaatif whentocallitoffdefiningtransplantcandidacylimitsinliverdonorlivertransplantationforhepatocellularcarcinoma