Cargando…
A Comparative Study of Different Immunoassays to Detect Specific Antibodies to Echinococcus Spp. in Human Sera
Human echinococcosis, one of the most serious of parasitic zoonoses, is caused by the larval stages of taeniid cestodes of the genus Echinococcus. The study aimed to assess the reliability of the detection of specific antibodies to E. multilocularis and E. granulosus s.l. in human sera and to compar...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Sciendo
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855609 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/helm-2020-0025 |
_version_ | 1783570457508708352 |
---|---|
author | Fecková, M. Antolová, D. Reiterová, K. |
author_facet | Fecková, M. Antolová, D. Reiterová, K. |
author_sort | Fecková, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human echinococcosis, one of the most serious of parasitic zoonoses, is caused by the larval stages of taeniid cestodes of the genus Echinococcus. The study aimed to assess the reliability of the detection of specific antibodies to E. multilocularis and E. granulosus s.l. in human sera and to compare their diagnostic potential for their utilization in the practice. In the study, the somatic antigen of E. multilocularis (AgEm), antigen B (AgB), and the hydatid fluid antigen of E. granulosus and two commercial ELISA kits – Echinococcus granulosus (Bordier Affinity Products, Crissier, Switzerland) and NovaLisa(TM) Echinococcus IgG (NovaTec Immunodiagnostica, Germany) – were compared. Sera of patients with alveolar and cystic echinococcosis, and with different parasitic/other infections were used to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and cross-reactivity of in-house and commercial ELISA methods. AgEm presented the highest values regarding the diagnostic indicators, showing 100 % specificity and 90.0 % sensitivity. The tests for serological diagnostics of cystic echinococcosis were less sensitive and specific. The Echinococcus granulosus kit had 83.8 % specificity and 88.2 % sensitivity, while AgB and AgHF showed 85.0 % and 86.3 % specificity, and 76.5 % and 100 % sensitivity, respectively. NovaLisa(TM) Echinococcus IgG proved to have 95.7 % specificity and 77.8 % sensitivity. The results point out that the combination of different serological tests and approaches in accordance with clinical and imaging findings is still essential to prove the correct diagnosis in suspected patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7425236 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Sciendo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74252362020-08-26 A Comparative Study of Different Immunoassays to Detect Specific Antibodies to Echinococcus Spp. in Human Sera Fecková, M. Antolová, D. Reiterová, K. Helminthologia Research Article Human echinococcosis, one of the most serious of parasitic zoonoses, is caused by the larval stages of taeniid cestodes of the genus Echinococcus. The study aimed to assess the reliability of the detection of specific antibodies to E. multilocularis and E. granulosus s.l. in human sera and to compare their diagnostic potential for their utilization in the practice. In the study, the somatic antigen of E. multilocularis (AgEm), antigen B (AgB), and the hydatid fluid antigen of E. granulosus and two commercial ELISA kits – Echinococcus granulosus (Bordier Affinity Products, Crissier, Switzerland) and NovaLisa(TM) Echinococcus IgG (NovaTec Immunodiagnostica, Germany) – were compared. Sera of patients with alveolar and cystic echinococcosis, and with different parasitic/other infections were used to evaluate the sensitivity, specificity and cross-reactivity of in-house and commercial ELISA methods. AgEm presented the highest values regarding the diagnostic indicators, showing 100 % specificity and 90.0 % sensitivity. The tests for serological diagnostics of cystic echinococcosis were less sensitive and specific. The Echinococcus granulosus kit had 83.8 % specificity and 88.2 % sensitivity, while AgB and AgHF showed 85.0 % and 86.3 % specificity, and 76.5 % and 100 % sensitivity, respectively. NovaLisa(TM) Echinococcus IgG proved to have 95.7 % specificity and 77.8 % sensitivity. The results point out that the combination of different serological tests and approaches in accordance with clinical and imaging findings is still essential to prove the correct diagnosis in suspected patients. Sciendo 2020-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7425236/ /pubmed/32855609 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/helm-2020-0025 Text en © 2020 M. Fecková, D. Antolová, K. Reiterová, published by Sciendo http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Fecková, M. Antolová, D. Reiterová, K. A Comparative Study of Different Immunoassays to Detect Specific Antibodies to Echinococcus Spp. in Human Sera |
title | A Comparative Study of Different Immunoassays to Detect Specific Antibodies to Echinococcus Spp. in Human Sera |
title_full | A Comparative Study of Different Immunoassays to Detect Specific Antibodies to Echinococcus Spp. in Human Sera |
title_fullStr | A Comparative Study of Different Immunoassays to Detect Specific Antibodies to Echinococcus Spp. in Human Sera |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparative Study of Different Immunoassays to Detect Specific Antibodies to Echinococcus Spp. in Human Sera |
title_short | A Comparative Study of Different Immunoassays to Detect Specific Antibodies to Echinococcus Spp. in Human Sera |
title_sort | comparative study of different immunoassays to detect specific antibodies to echinococcus spp. in human sera |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425236/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32855609 http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/helm-2020-0025 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feckovam acomparativestudyofdifferentimmunoassaystodetectspecificantibodiestoechinococcussppinhumansera AT antolovad acomparativestudyofdifferentimmunoassaystodetectspecificantibodiestoechinococcussppinhumansera AT reiterovak acomparativestudyofdifferentimmunoassaystodetectspecificantibodiestoechinococcussppinhumansera AT feckovam comparativestudyofdifferentimmunoassaystodetectspecificantibodiestoechinococcussppinhumansera AT antolovad comparativestudyofdifferentimmunoassaystodetectspecificantibodiestoechinococcussppinhumansera AT reiterovak comparativestudyofdifferentimmunoassaystodetectspecificantibodiestoechinococcussppinhumansera |