Cargando…

A comparison of MITS counseling and informed consent processes in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Kenya, and Ethiopia

Globally, more than 5 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually. For many, the cause of death (CoD) is unknown. Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) has been increasingly used in postmortem examinations for ascertaining the CoD in stillbirths and neonates. Our study compared the co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feroz, Anam Shahil, Paganelli, Christina, Bunei, Milka, Eshetu, Beza, Parveen, Shahana, Reza, Sayyeda, Sanji, Chaitali, Tikmani, Shiyam Sunder, Goudar, Shivaprasad S., Goudar, Guruprasad, Saleem, Sarah, McClure, Elizabeth M., Goldenberg, Robert L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32787868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00969-w
_version_ 1783570526675927040
author Feroz, Anam Shahil
Paganelli, Christina
Bunei, Milka
Eshetu, Beza
Parveen, Shahana
Reza, Sayyeda
Sanji, Chaitali
Tikmani, Shiyam Sunder
Goudar, Shivaprasad S.
Goudar, Guruprasad
Saleem, Sarah
McClure, Elizabeth M.
Goldenberg, Robert L.
author_facet Feroz, Anam Shahil
Paganelli, Christina
Bunei, Milka
Eshetu, Beza
Parveen, Shahana
Reza, Sayyeda
Sanji, Chaitali
Tikmani, Shiyam Sunder
Goudar, Shivaprasad S.
Goudar, Guruprasad
Saleem, Sarah
McClure, Elizabeth M.
Goldenberg, Robert L.
author_sort Feroz, Anam Shahil
collection PubMed
description Globally, more than 5 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually. For many, the cause of death (CoD) is unknown. Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) has been increasingly used in postmortem examinations for ascertaining the CoD in stillbirths and neonates. Our study compared the counseling and consent methods used in MITS projects in five countries in Africa and south Asia. Key informant interviews were conducted with researchers to describe the characteristics and backgrounds of counselors, the environment and timing of consent and perceived facilitators and barriers encountered during the consent process. Counselors at all sites had backgrounds in social science, psychology and counseling or clinical expertise in obstetrics/gynecology or pediatrics. All counsellors received training about techniques for building rapport and offering emotional support to families; training duration and methods differed across sites. Counselling environments varied significantly; some sites allocated a separate room, others counselled families at the bedside or nursing stations. All counsellors had a central role in explaining the MITS procedure to families in their local languages. Most sites did not use visual aids during the process, relying solely on verbal descriptions. In most sites, parents were approached within one hour of death. The time needed for decision making by families varied from a few minutes to 24 h. In most sites, extended family took part in the decision making. Because many parents wanted burial as soon as possible, counsellors ensured that MITS would be conducted promptly after receiving consent. Barriers to consent included decreased comprehension of information due to the emotional and psychological impact of grief. Moreover, having more family members engaged in decision-making increased the complexity of counselling and achieving consensus to consent for the procedure. While each site adapted their approach to fit the context, consistencies and similarities across sites were observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7425595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74255952020-08-16 A comparison of MITS counseling and informed consent processes in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Kenya, and Ethiopia Feroz, Anam Shahil Paganelli, Christina Bunei, Milka Eshetu, Beza Parveen, Shahana Reza, Sayyeda Sanji, Chaitali Tikmani, Shiyam Sunder Goudar, Shivaprasad S. Goudar, Guruprasad Saleem, Sarah McClure, Elizabeth M. Goldenberg, Robert L. Reprod Health Commentary Globally, more than 5 million stillbirths and neonatal deaths occur annually. For many, the cause of death (CoD) is unknown. Minimally invasive tissue sampling (MITS) has been increasingly used in postmortem examinations for ascertaining the CoD in stillbirths and neonates. Our study compared the counseling and consent methods used in MITS projects in five countries in Africa and south Asia. Key informant interviews were conducted with researchers to describe the characteristics and backgrounds of counselors, the environment and timing of consent and perceived facilitators and barriers encountered during the consent process. Counselors at all sites had backgrounds in social science, psychology and counseling or clinical expertise in obstetrics/gynecology or pediatrics. All counsellors received training about techniques for building rapport and offering emotional support to families; training duration and methods differed across sites. Counselling environments varied significantly; some sites allocated a separate room, others counselled families at the bedside or nursing stations. All counsellors had a central role in explaining the MITS procedure to families in their local languages. Most sites did not use visual aids during the process, relying solely on verbal descriptions. In most sites, parents were approached within one hour of death. The time needed for decision making by families varied from a few minutes to 24 h. In most sites, extended family took part in the decision making. Because many parents wanted burial as soon as possible, counsellors ensured that MITS would be conducted promptly after receiving consent. Barriers to consent included decreased comprehension of information due to the emotional and psychological impact of grief. Moreover, having more family members engaged in decision-making increased the complexity of counselling and achieving consensus to consent for the procedure. While each site adapted their approach to fit the context, consistencies and similarities across sites were observed. BioMed Central 2020-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7425595/ /pubmed/32787868 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00969-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Commentary
Feroz, Anam Shahil
Paganelli, Christina
Bunei, Milka
Eshetu, Beza
Parveen, Shahana
Reza, Sayyeda
Sanji, Chaitali
Tikmani, Shiyam Sunder
Goudar, Shivaprasad S.
Goudar, Guruprasad
Saleem, Sarah
McClure, Elizabeth M.
Goldenberg, Robert L.
A comparison of MITS counseling and informed consent processes in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Kenya, and Ethiopia
title A comparison of MITS counseling and informed consent processes in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Kenya, and Ethiopia
title_full A comparison of MITS counseling and informed consent processes in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Kenya, and Ethiopia
title_fullStr A comparison of MITS counseling and informed consent processes in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Kenya, and Ethiopia
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of MITS counseling and informed consent processes in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Kenya, and Ethiopia
title_short A comparison of MITS counseling and informed consent processes in Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Kenya, and Ethiopia
title_sort comparison of mits counseling and informed consent processes in pakistan, india, bangladesh, kenya, and ethiopia
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32787868
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00969-w
work_keys_str_mv AT ferozanamshahil acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT paganellichristina acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT buneimilka acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT eshetubeza acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT parveenshahana acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT rezasayyeda acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT sanjichaitali acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT tikmanishiyamsunder acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT goudarshivaprasads acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT goudarguruprasad acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT saleemsarah acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT mcclureelizabethm acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT goldenbergrobertl acomparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT ferozanamshahil comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT paganellichristina comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT buneimilka comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT eshetubeza comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT parveenshahana comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT rezasayyeda comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT sanjichaitali comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT tikmanishiyamsunder comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT goudarshivaprasads comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT goudarguruprasad comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT saleemsarah comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT mcclureelizabethm comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia
AT goldenbergrobertl comparisonofmitscounselingandinformedconsentprocessesinpakistanindiabangladeshkenyaandethiopia