Cargando…

Diffusing science through social networks: The case of breastfeeding communication on Twitter

Breastfeeding is one of many health practices known to support the survival and health of mother and infant, yet low breastfeeding rates persist globally. These rates may be influenced by limited diffusion of evidence-based research and guidelines from the scientific community (SC). As recently high...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moukarzel, Sara, Rehm, Martin, del Fresno, Miguel, Daly, Alan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32790712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237471
_version_ 1783570582006136832
author Moukarzel, Sara
Rehm, Martin
del Fresno, Miguel
Daly, Alan J.
author_facet Moukarzel, Sara
Rehm, Martin
del Fresno, Miguel
Daly, Alan J.
author_sort Moukarzel, Sara
collection PubMed
description Breastfeeding is one of many health practices known to support the survival and health of mother and infant, yet low breastfeeding rates persist globally. These rates may be influenced by limited diffusion of evidence-based research and guidelines from the scientific community (SC). As recently highlighted by the National Academy of Sciences, there is a need for the SC to diffuse its findings to the public more effectively online, as means to counteract the spread of misinformation. In response to this call, we gathered data from Twitter for one month from major breastfeeding hashtags resulting in an interconnected social network (n = 3,798 users). We then identified 59 influencers who disproportionately influenced information flow using social network analysis. These influencers were from the SC (e.g. academics, researchers, health care practitioners), as well as interested citizens (IC) and companies. We then conducted an ego-network analysis of influencer networks, developed ego maps, and compared diffusion metrics across the SC, IC and company influencers. We also qualitatively analyzed their tweets (n = 711) to understand the type of information being diffused. SC influencers were the least efficient communicators. Although having the highest tweeting activity (80% of tweets), they did not reach more individuals compared to IC and companies (two-step ego size: 220± 99, 188 ± 124, 169 ± 97 respectively, P = 0.28). Content analysis of tweets suggest IC are more active than the SC in diffusing evidence-based breastfeeding knowledge, with 35% of their tweets around recent research findings compared to only 12% by the SC. Nonetheless, in terms of outreach to the general public, the two-step networks of SC influences were more heterogenous than ICs (55.7 ± 5.07, 50.9 ± 12.0, respectively, P<0.001). Collectively, these findings suggest SC influencers may possess latent potential to diffuse research and evidence- based practices. However, the research suggests specific ways to enhance diffusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7425887
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74258872020-08-20 Diffusing science through social networks: The case of breastfeeding communication on Twitter Moukarzel, Sara Rehm, Martin del Fresno, Miguel Daly, Alan J. PLoS One Research Article Breastfeeding is one of many health practices known to support the survival and health of mother and infant, yet low breastfeeding rates persist globally. These rates may be influenced by limited diffusion of evidence-based research and guidelines from the scientific community (SC). As recently highlighted by the National Academy of Sciences, there is a need for the SC to diffuse its findings to the public more effectively online, as means to counteract the spread of misinformation. In response to this call, we gathered data from Twitter for one month from major breastfeeding hashtags resulting in an interconnected social network (n = 3,798 users). We then identified 59 influencers who disproportionately influenced information flow using social network analysis. These influencers were from the SC (e.g. academics, researchers, health care practitioners), as well as interested citizens (IC) and companies. We then conducted an ego-network analysis of influencer networks, developed ego maps, and compared diffusion metrics across the SC, IC and company influencers. We also qualitatively analyzed their tweets (n = 711) to understand the type of information being diffused. SC influencers were the least efficient communicators. Although having the highest tweeting activity (80% of tweets), they did not reach more individuals compared to IC and companies (two-step ego size: 220± 99, 188 ± 124, 169 ± 97 respectively, P = 0.28). Content analysis of tweets suggest IC are more active than the SC in diffusing evidence-based breastfeeding knowledge, with 35% of their tweets around recent research findings compared to only 12% by the SC. Nonetheless, in terms of outreach to the general public, the two-step networks of SC influences were more heterogenous than ICs (55.7 ± 5.07, 50.9 ± 12.0, respectively, P<0.001). Collectively, these findings suggest SC influencers may possess latent potential to diffuse research and evidence- based practices. However, the research suggests specific ways to enhance diffusion. Public Library of Science 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7425887/ /pubmed/32790712 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237471 Text en © 2020 Moukarzel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Moukarzel, Sara
Rehm, Martin
del Fresno, Miguel
Daly, Alan J.
Diffusing science through social networks: The case of breastfeeding communication on Twitter
title Diffusing science through social networks: The case of breastfeeding communication on Twitter
title_full Diffusing science through social networks: The case of breastfeeding communication on Twitter
title_fullStr Diffusing science through social networks: The case of breastfeeding communication on Twitter
title_full_unstemmed Diffusing science through social networks: The case of breastfeeding communication on Twitter
title_short Diffusing science through social networks: The case of breastfeeding communication on Twitter
title_sort diffusing science through social networks: the case of breastfeeding communication on twitter
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425887/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32790712
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237471
work_keys_str_mv AT moukarzelsara diffusingsciencethroughsocialnetworksthecaseofbreastfeedingcommunicationontwitter
AT rehmmartin diffusingsciencethroughsocialnetworksthecaseofbreastfeedingcommunicationontwitter
AT delfresnomiguel diffusingsciencethroughsocialnetworksthecaseofbreastfeedingcommunicationontwitter
AT dalyalanj diffusingsciencethroughsocialnetworksthecaseofbreastfeedingcommunicationontwitter