Cargando…
Increasing adverse drug reaction reporting—How can we do better?
Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are associated with morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although national systems for reporting ADRs exist there is a low reporting rate. The aim of the current study was to evaluate an intervention plan for improving ADRs reporting among medical professionals (physician...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32790671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235591 |
_version_ | 1783570583227727872 |
---|---|
author | Potlog Shchory, Miri Goldstein, Lee H. Arcavi, Lidia Shihmanter, Renata Berkovitch, Matitiahu Levy, Amalia |
author_facet | Potlog Shchory, Miri Goldstein, Lee H. Arcavi, Lidia Shihmanter, Renata Berkovitch, Matitiahu Levy, Amalia |
author_sort | Potlog Shchory, Miri |
collection | PubMed |
description | Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are associated with morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although national systems for reporting ADRs exist there is a low reporting rate. The aim of the current study was to evaluate an intervention plan for improving ADRs reporting among medical professionals (physicians and nurses). A multicentre intervention study was conducted, in which one medical centre was randomly assigned to the intervention group and two medical centres to the control group. The study consisted of 3 phases: baseline data collection, intervention and follow-up of the reporting rate. The questionnaire that was filled in at base line and at the end of study, contained questions about personal/professional demographic variables, and statements regarding knowledge of and behaviour toward ADRs reporting. The intervention program consisted of posters, lectures, distant electronic learning and reminders. An increase in the number of ADRs reports was noted in the intervention group (74 times higher than in the control group) during the intervention period, which was gradually decreased with as the study progressed (adjusted O.R = 74.1, 95% CI = 21.11–260.1, p<0.001). The changes in the "knowledge related to behaviour” (p = 0.01) and in the "behaviour related to reporting" (p<0.001) score was significantly higher in the intervention group. Specialist physicians and nurses (p<0.001), fulfilling additional positions (p<0.001) and those working in other places (p = 0.05) demonstrated a high rate of report. Lectures were preferable as a method to encourage ADRs reporting. The most convenient reporting tools were telephone and online reporting. Thus, implementation and maintenance of a continuous intervention program, by a pharmacovigilance specialist staff member, will improve ADRs reporting rates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7425892 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74258922020-08-20 Increasing adverse drug reaction reporting—How can we do better? Potlog Shchory, Miri Goldstein, Lee H. Arcavi, Lidia Shihmanter, Renata Berkovitch, Matitiahu Levy, Amalia PLoS One Research Article Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) are associated with morbidity and mortality worldwide. Although national systems for reporting ADRs exist there is a low reporting rate. The aim of the current study was to evaluate an intervention plan for improving ADRs reporting among medical professionals (physicians and nurses). A multicentre intervention study was conducted, in which one medical centre was randomly assigned to the intervention group and two medical centres to the control group. The study consisted of 3 phases: baseline data collection, intervention and follow-up of the reporting rate. The questionnaire that was filled in at base line and at the end of study, contained questions about personal/professional demographic variables, and statements regarding knowledge of and behaviour toward ADRs reporting. The intervention program consisted of posters, lectures, distant electronic learning and reminders. An increase in the number of ADRs reports was noted in the intervention group (74 times higher than in the control group) during the intervention period, which was gradually decreased with as the study progressed (adjusted O.R = 74.1, 95% CI = 21.11–260.1, p<0.001). The changes in the "knowledge related to behaviour” (p = 0.01) and in the "behaviour related to reporting" (p<0.001) score was significantly higher in the intervention group. Specialist physicians and nurses (p<0.001), fulfilling additional positions (p<0.001) and those working in other places (p = 0.05) demonstrated a high rate of report. Lectures were preferable as a method to encourage ADRs reporting. The most convenient reporting tools were telephone and online reporting. Thus, implementation and maintenance of a continuous intervention program, by a pharmacovigilance specialist staff member, will improve ADRs reporting rates. Public Library of Science 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7425892/ /pubmed/32790671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235591 Text en © 2020 Potlog Shchory et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Potlog Shchory, Miri Goldstein, Lee H. Arcavi, Lidia Shihmanter, Renata Berkovitch, Matitiahu Levy, Amalia Increasing adverse drug reaction reporting—How can we do better? |
title | Increasing adverse drug reaction reporting—How can we do better? |
title_full | Increasing adverse drug reaction reporting—How can we do better? |
title_fullStr | Increasing adverse drug reaction reporting—How can we do better? |
title_full_unstemmed | Increasing adverse drug reaction reporting—How can we do better? |
title_short | Increasing adverse drug reaction reporting—How can we do better? |
title_sort | increasing adverse drug reaction reporting—how can we do better? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7425892/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32790671 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235591 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT potlogshchorymiri increasingadversedrugreactionreportinghowcanwedobetter AT goldsteinleeh increasingadversedrugreactionreportinghowcanwedobetter AT arcavilidia increasingadversedrugreactionreportinghowcanwedobetter AT shihmanterrenata increasingadversedrugreactionreportinghowcanwedobetter AT berkovitchmatitiahu increasingadversedrugreactionreportinghowcanwedobetter AT levyamalia increasingadversedrugreactionreportinghowcanwedobetter |