Cargando…
Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline
BACKGROUND: No guidelines have been published regarding stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of Spetzler-Martin grade I and II arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). OBJECTIVE: To establish SRS practice guidelines for grade I-II AVMs on the basis of a systematic literature review. METHODS:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32065836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa004 |
_version_ | 1783570633501704192 |
---|---|
author | Graffeo, Christopher S Sahgal, Arjun De Salles, Antonio Fariselli, Laura Levivier, Marc Ma, Lijun Paddick, Ian Regis, Jean Marie Sheehan, Jason Suh, John Yomo, Shoji Pollock, Bruce E |
author_facet | Graffeo, Christopher S Sahgal, Arjun De Salles, Antonio Fariselli, Laura Levivier, Marc Ma, Lijun Paddick, Ian Regis, Jean Marie Sheehan, Jason Suh, John Yomo, Shoji Pollock, Bruce E |
author_sort | Graffeo, Christopher S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: No guidelines have been published regarding stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of Spetzler-Martin grade I and II arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). OBJECTIVE: To establish SRS practice guidelines for grade I-II AVMs on the basis of a systematic literature review. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant search of Medline, Embase, and Scopus, 1986-2018, for publications reporting post-SRS outcomes in ≥10 grade I-II AVMs with a follow-up of ≥24 mo. Primary endpoints were obliteration and hemorrhage; secondary outcomes included Spetzler-Martin parameters, dosimetric variables, and “excellent” outcomes (defined as total obliteration without new post-SRS deficit). RESULTS: Of 447 abstracts screened, 8 were included (n = 1, level 2 evidence; n = 7, level 4 evidence), representing 1102 AVMs, of which 836 (76%) were grade II. Obliteration was achieved in 884 (80%) at a median of 37 mo; 66 hemorrhages (6%) occurred during a median follow-up of 68 mo. Total obliteration without hemorrhage was achieved in 78%. Of 836 grade II AVMs, Spetzler-Martin parameters were reported in 680: 377 were eloquent brain and 178 had deep venous drainage, totaling 555/680 (82%) high-risk SRS-treated grade II AVMs. CONCLUSION: The literature regarding SRS for grade I-II AVM is low quality, limiting interpretation. Cautiously, we observed that SRS appears to be a safe, effective treatment for grade I-II AVM and may be considered a front-line treatment, particularly for lesions in deep or eloquent locations. Preceding publications may be influenced by selection bias, with favorable AVMs undergoing resection, whereas those at increased risk of complications and nonobliteration are disproportionately referred for SRS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7426190 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74261902020-08-18 Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline Graffeo, Christopher S Sahgal, Arjun De Salles, Antonio Fariselli, Laura Levivier, Marc Ma, Lijun Paddick, Ian Regis, Jean Marie Sheehan, Jason Suh, John Yomo, Shoji Pollock, Bruce E Neurosurgery Review BACKGROUND: No guidelines have been published regarding stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of Spetzler-Martin grade I and II arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). OBJECTIVE: To establish SRS practice guidelines for grade I-II AVMs on the basis of a systematic literature review. METHODS: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA)-compliant search of Medline, Embase, and Scopus, 1986-2018, for publications reporting post-SRS outcomes in ≥10 grade I-II AVMs with a follow-up of ≥24 mo. Primary endpoints were obliteration and hemorrhage; secondary outcomes included Spetzler-Martin parameters, dosimetric variables, and “excellent” outcomes (defined as total obliteration without new post-SRS deficit). RESULTS: Of 447 abstracts screened, 8 were included (n = 1, level 2 evidence; n = 7, level 4 evidence), representing 1102 AVMs, of which 836 (76%) were grade II. Obliteration was achieved in 884 (80%) at a median of 37 mo; 66 hemorrhages (6%) occurred during a median follow-up of 68 mo. Total obliteration without hemorrhage was achieved in 78%. Of 836 grade II AVMs, Spetzler-Martin parameters were reported in 680: 377 were eloquent brain and 178 had deep venous drainage, totaling 555/680 (82%) high-risk SRS-treated grade II AVMs. CONCLUSION: The literature regarding SRS for grade I-II AVM is low quality, limiting interpretation. Cautiously, we observed that SRS appears to be a safe, effective treatment for grade I-II AVM and may be considered a front-line treatment, particularly for lesions in deep or eloquent locations. Preceding publications may be influenced by selection bias, with favorable AVMs undergoing resection, whereas those at increased risk of complications and nonobliteration are disproportionately referred for SRS. Oxford University Press 2020-09 2020-02-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7426190/ /pubmed/32065836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa004 Text en © Congress of Neurological Surgeons 2020. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Review Graffeo, Christopher S Sahgal, Arjun De Salles, Antonio Fariselli, Laura Levivier, Marc Ma, Lijun Paddick, Ian Regis, Jean Marie Sheehan, Jason Suh, John Yomo, Shoji Pollock, Bruce E Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline |
title | Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline |
title_full | Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline |
title_fullStr | Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline |
title_full_unstemmed | Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline |
title_short | Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade I and II Arteriovenous Malformations: International Society of Stereotactic Radiosurgery (ISRS) Practice Guideline |
title_sort | stereotactic radiosurgery for spetzler-martin grade i and ii arteriovenous malformations: international society of stereotactic radiosurgery (isrs) practice guideline |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426190/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32065836 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyaa004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT graffeochristophers stereotacticradiosurgeryforspetzlermartingradeiandiiarteriovenousmalformationsinternationalsocietyofstereotacticradiosurgeryisrspracticeguideline AT sahgalarjun stereotacticradiosurgeryforspetzlermartingradeiandiiarteriovenousmalformationsinternationalsocietyofstereotacticradiosurgeryisrspracticeguideline AT desallesantonio stereotacticradiosurgeryforspetzlermartingradeiandiiarteriovenousmalformationsinternationalsocietyofstereotacticradiosurgeryisrspracticeguideline AT farisellilaura stereotacticradiosurgeryforspetzlermartingradeiandiiarteriovenousmalformationsinternationalsocietyofstereotacticradiosurgeryisrspracticeguideline AT leviviermarc stereotacticradiosurgeryforspetzlermartingradeiandiiarteriovenousmalformationsinternationalsocietyofstereotacticradiosurgeryisrspracticeguideline AT malijun stereotacticradiosurgeryforspetzlermartingradeiandiiarteriovenousmalformationsinternationalsocietyofstereotacticradiosurgeryisrspracticeguideline AT paddickian stereotacticradiosurgeryforspetzlermartingradeiandiiarteriovenousmalformationsinternationalsocietyofstereotacticradiosurgeryisrspracticeguideline AT regisjeanmarie stereotacticradiosurgeryforspetzlermartingradeiandiiarteriovenousmalformationsinternationalsocietyofstereotacticradiosurgeryisrspracticeguideline AT sheehanjason stereotacticradiosurgeryforspetzlermartingradeiandiiarteriovenousmalformationsinternationalsocietyofstereotacticradiosurgeryisrspracticeguideline AT suhjohn stereotacticradiosurgeryforspetzlermartingradeiandiiarteriovenousmalformationsinternationalsocietyofstereotacticradiosurgeryisrspracticeguideline AT yomoshoji stereotacticradiosurgeryforspetzlermartingradeiandiiarteriovenousmalformationsinternationalsocietyofstereotacticradiosurgeryisrspracticeguideline AT pollockbrucee stereotacticradiosurgeryforspetzlermartingradeiandiiarteriovenousmalformationsinternationalsocietyofstereotacticradiosurgeryisrspracticeguideline |