Cargando…

Self-Monitoring and Management of Blood Pressure in Patients with Stroke or TIA: An Economic Evaluation of TEST-BP, A Randomised Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Prevention of secondary stroke following initial ictus is an important focus of after-stroke care. Blood pressure (BP) is a key risk factor, so usual care following stroke or transient ischaemic attack includes regular BP checks and monitoring of anti-hypertensive medication. This is tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Lois G., Wilson, Edward C. F., Davison, William J., Clark, Allan B., Myint, Phyo K., Potter, John F.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32056146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00196-w
_version_ 1783570661348737024
author Kim, Lois G.
Wilson, Edward C. F.
Davison, William J.
Clark, Allan B.
Myint, Phyo K.
Potter, John F.
author_facet Kim, Lois G.
Wilson, Edward C. F.
Davison, William J.
Clark, Allan B.
Myint, Phyo K.
Potter, John F.
author_sort Kim, Lois G.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Prevention of secondary stroke following initial ictus is an important focus of after-stroke care. Blood pressure (BP) is a key risk factor, so usual care following stroke or transient ischaemic attack includes regular BP checks and monitoring of anti-hypertensive medication. This is traditionally carried out in primary care, but the evidence supporting self-monitoring and self-guided management of BP in the general population with hypertension is growing. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to estimate the cost effectiveness of treatment as usual (TAU) versus (1) self-monitoring of BP (S-MON) and (2) self-monitoring and guided self-management of anti-hypertensive medication (S-MAN). METHODS: This was a within-trial economic evaluation of a randomised controlled trial estimating the incremental cost per 1 mmHg BP reduction and per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained over a 6-month time horizon from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS). RESULTS: Data were evaluable for 140 participants. Costs per patient were £473, £853 and £1035; mean reduction in systolic BP (SBP) was 3.6, 6.7 and 6.1 mmHg, and QALYs accrued were 0.427, 0.422 and 0.423 for TAU, S-MON and S-MAN, respectively. No statistically significant differences in incremental costs or outcomes were detected. On average, S-MAN was dominated or extended dominated. The incremental cost per 1 mmHg BP reduction from S-MON versus TAU was £137. CONCLUSION: On average, S-MAN is an inefficient intervention. S-MON may be cost effective, depending on the willingness to pay for a 1 mmHg BP reduction, although it yielded fewer QALYs over the within-trial time horizon. Decision modelling is required to explore the longer-term costs and outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-020-00196-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7426342
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74263422020-08-19 Self-Monitoring and Management of Blood Pressure in Patients with Stroke or TIA: An Economic Evaluation of TEST-BP, A Randomised Controlled Trial Kim, Lois G. Wilson, Edward C. F. Davison, William J. Clark, Allan B. Myint, Phyo K. Potter, John F. Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Prevention of secondary stroke following initial ictus is an important focus of after-stroke care. Blood pressure (BP) is a key risk factor, so usual care following stroke or transient ischaemic attack includes regular BP checks and monitoring of anti-hypertensive medication. This is traditionally carried out in primary care, but the evidence supporting self-monitoring and self-guided management of BP in the general population with hypertension is growing. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to estimate the cost effectiveness of treatment as usual (TAU) versus (1) self-monitoring of BP (S-MON) and (2) self-monitoring and guided self-management of anti-hypertensive medication (S-MAN). METHODS: This was a within-trial economic evaluation of a randomised controlled trial estimating the incremental cost per 1 mmHg BP reduction and per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained over a 6-month time horizon from the perspective of the UK National Health Service (NHS). RESULTS: Data were evaluable for 140 participants. Costs per patient were £473, £853 and £1035; mean reduction in systolic BP (SBP) was 3.6, 6.7 and 6.1 mmHg, and QALYs accrued were 0.427, 0.422 and 0.423 for TAU, S-MON and S-MAN, respectively. No statistically significant differences in incremental costs or outcomes were detected. On average, S-MAN was dominated or extended dominated. The incremental cost per 1 mmHg BP reduction from S-MON versus TAU was £137. CONCLUSION: On average, S-MAN is an inefficient intervention. S-MON may be cost effective, depending on the willingness to pay for a 1 mmHg BP reduction, although it yielded fewer QALYs over the within-trial time horizon. Decision modelling is required to explore the longer-term costs and outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s41669-020-00196-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-02-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7426342/ /pubmed/32056146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00196-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Kim, Lois G.
Wilson, Edward C. F.
Davison, William J.
Clark, Allan B.
Myint, Phyo K.
Potter, John F.
Self-Monitoring and Management of Blood Pressure in Patients with Stroke or TIA: An Economic Evaluation of TEST-BP, A Randomised Controlled Trial
title Self-Monitoring and Management of Blood Pressure in Patients with Stroke or TIA: An Economic Evaluation of TEST-BP, A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full Self-Monitoring and Management of Blood Pressure in Patients with Stroke or TIA: An Economic Evaluation of TEST-BP, A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Self-Monitoring and Management of Blood Pressure in Patients with Stroke or TIA: An Economic Evaluation of TEST-BP, A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Self-Monitoring and Management of Blood Pressure in Patients with Stroke or TIA: An Economic Evaluation of TEST-BP, A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_short Self-Monitoring and Management of Blood Pressure in Patients with Stroke or TIA: An Economic Evaluation of TEST-BP, A Randomised Controlled Trial
title_sort self-monitoring and management of blood pressure in patients with stroke or tia: an economic evaluation of test-bp, a randomised controlled trial
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426342/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32056146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-020-00196-w
work_keys_str_mv AT kimloisg selfmonitoringandmanagementofbloodpressureinpatientswithstrokeortiaaneconomicevaluationoftestbparandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wilsonedwardcf selfmonitoringandmanagementofbloodpressureinpatientswithstrokeortiaaneconomicevaluationoftestbparandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT davisonwilliamj selfmonitoringandmanagementofbloodpressureinpatientswithstrokeortiaaneconomicevaluationoftestbparandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT clarkallanb selfmonitoringandmanagementofbloodpressureinpatientswithstrokeortiaaneconomicevaluationoftestbparandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT myintphyok selfmonitoringandmanagementofbloodpressureinpatientswithstrokeortiaaneconomicevaluationoftestbparandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT potterjohnf selfmonitoringandmanagementofbloodpressureinpatientswithstrokeortiaaneconomicevaluationoftestbparandomisedcontrolledtrial