Cargando…

Responses of active soil microorganisms facing to a soil biostimulant input compared to plant legacy effects

Agriculture is changing to rely on agroecological practices that take into account biodiversity, and the ecological processes occurring in soils. The use of agricultural biostimulants has emerged as a valid alternative to chemicals to indirectly sustain plant growth and productivity. Certain BS have...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hellequin, Eve, Monard, Cécile, Chorin, Marion, Le bris, Nathalie, Daburon, Virginie, Klarzynski, Olivier, Binet, Françoise
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70695-7
_version_ 1783570679764877312
author Hellequin, Eve
Monard, Cécile
Chorin, Marion
Le bris, Nathalie
Daburon, Virginie
Klarzynski, Olivier
Binet, Françoise
author_facet Hellequin, Eve
Monard, Cécile
Chorin, Marion
Le bris, Nathalie
Daburon, Virginie
Klarzynski, Olivier
Binet, Françoise
author_sort Hellequin, Eve
collection PubMed
description Agriculture is changing to rely on agroecological practices that take into account biodiversity, and the ecological processes occurring in soils. The use of agricultural biostimulants has emerged as a valid alternative to chemicals to indirectly sustain plant growth and productivity. Certain BS have been shown to select and stimulate plant beneficial soil microorganisms. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the effects and way of action of the biostimulants operating on soil functioning as well as on the extent and dynamic of these effects. In this study we aimed to decipher the way of action of a seaweed and amino-acids based biostimulant intended to be applied on soil crop residues to increase their microbial mineralization and the further release of nutrients. By setting-up a two-phase experiment (soil plant-growing and soil incubation), our objectives were to (1) determine the effects of the soil biostimulant over time on the active soil bacteria and fungi and the consequences on the organic carbon mineralization in bare soils, and (2) assess the biostimulant effects on soil microorganisms relatively to plant legacy effects in planted soils. We demonstrated that the soil biostimulant had a delayed effect on the active soil microorganisms and activated both plant growth promoting bacteria and saprophytes microorganisms at the medium-term of 49 days. However, the changes in the abundances of active microbial decomposers were not associated to a higher mineralization rate of organic carbon derived from soil and/or litter. The present study assessed the biostimulant beneficial effect on active soil microbial communities as similar as or even higher than the legacy effects of either A. thaliana or T. aestivum plants. We specifically showed that the biostimulant increased the active fungal richness to a higher extent than observed in soils that previously grew the two plants tested.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7426422
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74264222020-08-14 Responses of active soil microorganisms facing to a soil biostimulant input compared to plant legacy effects Hellequin, Eve Monard, Cécile Chorin, Marion Le bris, Nathalie Daburon, Virginie Klarzynski, Olivier Binet, Françoise Sci Rep Article Agriculture is changing to rely on agroecological practices that take into account biodiversity, and the ecological processes occurring in soils. The use of agricultural biostimulants has emerged as a valid alternative to chemicals to indirectly sustain plant growth and productivity. Certain BS have been shown to select and stimulate plant beneficial soil microorganisms. However, there is a lack of knowledge on the effects and way of action of the biostimulants operating on soil functioning as well as on the extent and dynamic of these effects. In this study we aimed to decipher the way of action of a seaweed and amino-acids based biostimulant intended to be applied on soil crop residues to increase their microbial mineralization and the further release of nutrients. By setting-up a two-phase experiment (soil plant-growing and soil incubation), our objectives were to (1) determine the effects of the soil biostimulant over time on the active soil bacteria and fungi and the consequences on the organic carbon mineralization in bare soils, and (2) assess the biostimulant effects on soil microorganisms relatively to plant legacy effects in planted soils. We demonstrated that the soil biostimulant had a delayed effect on the active soil microorganisms and activated both plant growth promoting bacteria and saprophytes microorganisms at the medium-term of 49 days. However, the changes in the abundances of active microbial decomposers were not associated to a higher mineralization rate of organic carbon derived from soil and/or litter. The present study assessed the biostimulant beneficial effect on active soil microbial communities as similar as or even higher than the legacy effects of either A. thaliana or T. aestivum plants. We specifically showed that the biostimulant increased the active fungal richness to a higher extent than observed in soils that previously grew the two plants tested. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7426422/ /pubmed/32792675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70695-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Hellequin, Eve
Monard, Cécile
Chorin, Marion
Le bris, Nathalie
Daburon, Virginie
Klarzynski, Olivier
Binet, Françoise
Responses of active soil microorganisms facing to a soil biostimulant input compared to plant legacy effects
title Responses of active soil microorganisms facing to a soil biostimulant input compared to plant legacy effects
title_full Responses of active soil microorganisms facing to a soil biostimulant input compared to plant legacy effects
title_fullStr Responses of active soil microorganisms facing to a soil biostimulant input compared to plant legacy effects
title_full_unstemmed Responses of active soil microorganisms facing to a soil biostimulant input compared to plant legacy effects
title_short Responses of active soil microorganisms facing to a soil biostimulant input compared to plant legacy effects
title_sort responses of active soil microorganisms facing to a soil biostimulant input compared to plant legacy effects
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426422/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32792675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70695-7
work_keys_str_mv AT hellequineve responsesofactivesoilmicroorganismsfacingtoasoilbiostimulantinputcomparedtoplantlegacyeffects
AT monardcecile responsesofactivesoilmicroorganismsfacingtoasoilbiostimulantinputcomparedtoplantlegacyeffects
AT chorinmarion responsesofactivesoilmicroorganismsfacingtoasoilbiostimulantinputcomparedtoplantlegacyeffects
AT lebrisnathalie responsesofactivesoilmicroorganismsfacingtoasoilbiostimulantinputcomparedtoplantlegacyeffects
AT daburonvirginie responsesofactivesoilmicroorganismsfacingtoasoilbiostimulantinputcomparedtoplantlegacyeffects
AT klarzynskiolivier responsesofactivesoilmicroorganismsfacingtoasoilbiostimulantinputcomparedtoplantlegacyeffects
AT binetfrancoise responsesofactivesoilmicroorganismsfacingtoasoilbiostimulantinputcomparedtoplantlegacyeffects