Cargando…

Phase II Study of Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer With an Incomplete Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy

Background: Phase 3 studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors have not shown a survival benefit in prostate cancer, but some patients have a profound anticancer response. Patients and Methods: We evaluated the efficacy of the CTLA-4 targeted agent, ipilimumab, in metastatic prostate cancer patients wh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Graff, Julie N., Stein, Mark N., Surana, Rishi, Al Rabadi, Luai, Liu, Eric, Fong, Lawrence, Bailey, Shawna, Latour, Emile, Newby, Timothy A., Moran, Amy E., Beer, Tomasz M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32850444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01381
_version_ 1783570701158973440
author Graff, Julie N.
Stein, Mark N.
Surana, Rishi
Al Rabadi, Luai
Liu, Eric
Fong, Lawrence
Bailey, Shawna
Latour, Emile
Newby, Timothy A.
Moran, Amy E.
Beer, Tomasz M.
author_facet Graff, Julie N.
Stein, Mark N.
Surana, Rishi
Al Rabadi, Luai
Liu, Eric
Fong, Lawrence
Bailey, Shawna
Latour, Emile
Newby, Timothy A.
Moran, Amy E.
Beer, Tomasz M.
author_sort Graff, Julie N.
collection PubMed
description Background: Phase 3 studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors have not shown a survival benefit in prostate cancer, but some patients have a profound anticancer response. Patients and Methods: We evaluated the efficacy of the CTLA-4 targeted agent, ipilimumab, in metastatic prostate cancer patients who had an incomplete biochemical response to initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone. Ten patients were enrolled, each treated with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg (every 3 weeks for up to 4 doses) with maintenance ipilimumab every 12 weeks for non-progressing patients. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients with an undetectable PSA. The total sample size was 30 patients, but there was an interim analysis planned at 10 for futility. If none of the 10 patients achieved an undetectable PSA, the study would be halted. Results: The study was halted at the interim analysis as none of the 10 patients achieved the primary endpoint, but 30% of patients demonstrated a >50% reduction in PSA, with one patient achieving a >90% reduction in PSA. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) examined by mass cytometry showed that patients with clinical responses had an increase in effector memory T-cell subsets as well as an increase in T-cell expression of T-bet, suggesting induction of a Th1 response. Conclusions: This study provides further evidence that ipilimumab has activity in some patients with prostate cancer and provides further rationale for the development of future studies aimed at identifying a subset of patients with CPRC that are more likely to derive a benefit from treatment with ipilimumab. Implications for Practice: There is insufficient evidence to use ipilimumab in prostate cancer in routine practice. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01498978. Registered 26 December 2011. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01498978?term=julie+graff&rank=3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7426513
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74265132020-08-25 Phase II Study of Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer With an Incomplete Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy Graff, Julie N. Stein, Mark N. Surana, Rishi Al Rabadi, Luai Liu, Eric Fong, Lawrence Bailey, Shawna Latour, Emile Newby, Timothy A. Moran, Amy E. Beer, Tomasz M. Front Oncol Oncology Background: Phase 3 studies of immune checkpoint inhibitors have not shown a survival benefit in prostate cancer, but some patients have a profound anticancer response. Patients and Methods: We evaluated the efficacy of the CTLA-4 targeted agent, ipilimumab, in metastatic prostate cancer patients who had an incomplete biochemical response to initial androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone. Ten patients were enrolled, each treated with ipilimumab 10 mg/kg (every 3 weeks for up to 4 doses) with maintenance ipilimumab every 12 weeks for non-progressing patients. The primary endpoint was proportion of patients with an undetectable PSA. The total sample size was 30 patients, but there was an interim analysis planned at 10 for futility. If none of the 10 patients achieved an undetectable PSA, the study would be halted. Results: The study was halted at the interim analysis as none of the 10 patients achieved the primary endpoint, but 30% of patients demonstrated a >50% reduction in PSA, with one patient achieving a >90% reduction in PSA. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) examined by mass cytometry showed that patients with clinical responses had an increase in effector memory T-cell subsets as well as an increase in T-cell expression of T-bet, suggesting induction of a Th1 response. Conclusions: This study provides further evidence that ipilimumab has activity in some patients with prostate cancer and provides further rationale for the development of future studies aimed at identifying a subset of patients with CPRC that are more likely to derive a benefit from treatment with ipilimumab. Implications for Practice: There is insufficient evidence to use ipilimumab in prostate cancer in routine practice. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01498978. Registered 26 December 2011. https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01498978?term=julie+graff&rank=3. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7426513/ /pubmed/32850444 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01381 Text en Copyright © 2020 Graff, Stein, Surana, Al Rabadi, Liu, Fong, Bailey, Latour, Newby, Moran and Beer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Graff, Julie N.
Stein, Mark N.
Surana, Rishi
Al Rabadi, Luai
Liu, Eric
Fong, Lawrence
Bailey, Shawna
Latour, Emile
Newby, Timothy A.
Moran, Amy E.
Beer, Tomasz M.
Phase II Study of Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer With an Incomplete Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy
title Phase II Study of Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer With an Incomplete Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy
title_full Phase II Study of Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer With an Incomplete Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy
title_fullStr Phase II Study of Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer With an Incomplete Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy
title_full_unstemmed Phase II Study of Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer With an Incomplete Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy
title_short Phase II Study of Ipilimumab in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer With an Incomplete Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy
title_sort phase ii study of ipilimumab in men with metastatic prostate cancer with an incomplete response to androgen deprivation therapy
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426513/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32850444
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.01381
work_keys_str_mv AT graffjulien phaseiistudyofipilimumabinmenwithmetastaticprostatecancerwithanincompleteresponsetoandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT steinmarkn phaseiistudyofipilimumabinmenwithmetastaticprostatecancerwithanincompleteresponsetoandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT suranarishi phaseiistudyofipilimumabinmenwithmetastaticprostatecancerwithanincompleteresponsetoandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT alrabadiluai phaseiistudyofipilimumabinmenwithmetastaticprostatecancerwithanincompleteresponsetoandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT liueric phaseiistudyofipilimumabinmenwithmetastaticprostatecancerwithanincompleteresponsetoandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT fonglawrence phaseiistudyofipilimumabinmenwithmetastaticprostatecancerwithanincompleteresponsetoandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT baileyshawna phaseiistudyofipilimumabinmenwithmetastaticprostatecancerwithanincompleteresponsetoandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT latouremile phaseiistudyofipilimumabinmenwithmetastaticprostatecancerwithanincompleteresponsetoandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT newbytimothya phaseiistudyofipilimumabinmenwithmetastaticprostatecancerwithanincompleteresponsetoandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT moranamye phaseiistudyofipilimumabinmenwithmetastaticprostatecancerwithanincompleteresponsetoandrogendeprivationtherapy
AT beertomaszm phaseiistudyofipilimumabinmenwithmetastaticprostatecancerwithanincompleteresponsetoandrogendeprivationtherapy