Cargando…

EUS-guided transrectal drainage of pelvic fluid collections using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents: a case series

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pelvic fluid collections (PFCs) are frequent adverse events of abdominal surgery or inflammatory conditions. A percutaneous approach to deep PFCs could be challenging and result in a longer, painful recovery. The transvaginal approach has been considered easy but is limited by t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lisotti, Andrea, Cominardi, Anna, Bacchilega, Igor, Linguerri, Romano, Fusaroli, Pietro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vgie.2020.04.014
_version_ 1783570777262522368
author Lisotti, Andrea
Cominardi, Anna
Bacchilega, Igor
Linguerri, Romano
Fusaroli, Pietro
author_facet Lisotti, Andrea
Cominardi, Anna
Bacchilega, Igor
Linguerri, Romano
Fusaroli, Pietro
author_sort Lisotti, Andrea
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pelvic fluid collections (PFCs) are frequent adverse events of abdominal surgery or inflammatory conditions. A percutaneous approach to deep PFCs could be challenging and result in a longer, painful recovery. The transvaginal approach has been considered easy but is limited by the difficulty of leaving a stent in place. The transrectal approach has been described, but issues related to fecal contamination were hypothesized. Data on EUS-guided transrectal drainage (EUS-TRD) with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) are few and suggest unsatisfactory outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-TRD with LAMSs in patients with PFCs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database on therapeutic EUS was conducted. All EUS-TRD procedures were included. RESULTS: Five patients (2 male, age 44-89 years) were included. Four patients had postoperative PFCs, and 1 presented with a pelvic abscess complicating acute diverticulitis. Two of 5 had fecal diversion; the remaining 3 had unaltered large-bowel anatomy. One case had a concomitant abdominal collection, treated with percutaneous drainage in the same session. An electrocautery-enhanced LAMS delivery system (15 × 10 mm) was used in all cases. EUS-TRD was performed with the direct-puncture technique and lasted less than 10 minutes in 4 cases; in the remaining case, needle puncture and LAMS placement over a guidewire was required, and the procedure length was 14 minutes. The clinical success rate was 100%. LAMSs were removed after a median of 14 (range, 12-24) days. One patient reported partial proximal LAMS migration after 24 days (mild adverse event). No PFC recurrence was observed. CONCLUSION: EUS-TRD with LAMSs is a safe and effective technique for treatment of PFCs. The use of 15- × 10-mm LAMSs allows rapid PFC resolution. EUS-TRD could be performed not only in patients with fecal diversion but also in cases of unaltered anatomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7426890
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74268902020-08-19 EUS-guided transrectal drainage of pelvic fluid collections using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents: a case series Lisotti, Andrea Cominardi, Anna Bacchilega, Igor Linguerri, Romano Fusaroli, Pietro VideoGIE Video Case Series BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Pelvic fluid collections (PFCs) are frequent adverse events of abdominal surgery or inflammatory conditions. A percutaneous approach to deep PFCs could be challenging and result in a longer, painful recovery. The transvaginal approach has been considered easy but is limited by the difficulty of leaving a stent in place. The transrectal approach has been described, but issues related to fecal contamination were hypothesized. Data on EUS-guided transrectal drainage (EUS-TRD) with lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) are few and suggest unsatisfactory outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of EUS-TRD with LAMSs in patients with PFCs. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database on therapeutic EUS was conducted. All EUS-TRD procedures were included. RESULTS: Five patients (2 male, age 44-89 years) were included. Four patients had postoperative PFCs, and 1 presented with a pelvic abscess complicating acute diverticulitis. Two of 5 had fecal diversion; the remaining 3 had unaltered large-bowel anatomy. One case had a concomitant abdominal collection, treated with percutaneous drainage in the same session. An electrocautery-enhanced LAMS delivery system (15 × 10 mm) was used in all cases. EUS-TRD was performed with the direct-puncture technique and lasted less than 10 minutes in 4 cases; in the remaining case, needle puncture and LAMS placement over a guidewire was required, and the procedure length was 14 minutes. The clinical success rate was 100%. LAMSs were removed after a median of 14 (range, 12-24) days. One patient reported partial proximal LAMS migration after 24 days (mild adverse event). No PFC recurrence was observed. CONCLUSION: EUS-TRD with LAMSs is a safe and effective technique for treatment of PFCs. The use of 15- × 10-mm LAMSs allows rapid PFC resolution. EUS-TRD could be performed not only in patients with fecal diversion but also in cases of unaltered anatomy. Elsevier 2020-05-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7426890/ /pubmed/32821872 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vgie.2020.04.014 Text en © 2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Video Case Series
Lisotti, Andrea
Cominardi, Anna
Bacchilega, Igor
Linguerri, Romano
Fusaroli, Pietro
EUS-guided transrectal drainage of pelvic fluid collections using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents: a case series
title EUS-guided transrectal drainage of pelvic fluid collections using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents: a case series
title_full EUS-guided transrectal drainage of pelvic fluid collections using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents: a case series
title_fullStr EUS-guided transrectal drainage of pelvic fluid collections using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents: a case series
title_full_unstemmed EUS-guided transrectal drainage of pelvic fluid collections using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents: a case series
title_short EUS-guided transrectal drainage of pelvic fluid collections using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents: a case series
title_sort eus-guided transrectal drainage of pelvic fluid collections using electrocautery-enhanced lumen-apposing metal stents: a case series
topic Video Case Series
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7426890/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32821872
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.vgie.2020.04.014
work_keys_str_mv AT lisottiandrea eusguidedtransrectaldrainageofpelvicfluidcollectionsusingelectrocauteryenhancedlumenapposingmetalstentsacaseseries
AT cominardianna eusguidedtransrectaldrainageofpelvicfluidcollectionsusingelectrocauteryenhancedlumenapposingmetalstentsacaseseries
AT bacchilegaigor eusguidedtransrectaldrainageofpelvicfluidcollectionsusingelectrocauteryenhancedlumenapposingmetalstentsacaseseries
AT linguerriromano eusguidedtransrectaldrainageofpelvicfluidcollectionsusingelectrocauteryenhancedlumenapposingmetalstentsacaseseries
AT fusarolipietro eusguidedtransrectaldrainageofpelvicfluidcollectionsusingelectrocauteryenhancedlumenapposingmetalstentsacaseseries