Cargando…

Comparison of Thromboelastography and Conventional Coagulation Tests in Patients With Severe Liver Disease

OBJECTIVE: Thromboelastography (TEG) may provide rapid and clinically important coagulation information in acutely ill patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Our objective was to describe the relationship between TEG and conventional coagulation tests (CCTs), which has not been previously explor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lloyd-Donald, Patryck, Vasudevan, Abhinav, Angus, Peter, Gow, Paul, Mårtensson, Johan, Glassford, Neil, Eastwood, Glenn M., Hart, Graeme K., Jones, Daryl, Weinberg, Laurence, Bellomo, Rinaldo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32496878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029620925915
_version_ 1783570806239920128
author Lloyd-Donald, Patryck
Vasudevan, Abhinav
Angus, Peter
Gow, Paul
Mårtensson, Johan
Glassford, Neil
Eastwood, Glenn M.
Hart, Graeme K.
Jones, Daryl
Weinberg, Laurence
Bellomo, Rinaldo
author_facet Lloyd-Donald, Patryck
Vasudevan, Abhinav
Angus, Peter
Gow, Paul
Mårtensson, Johan
Glassford, Neil
Eastwood, Glenn M.
Hart, Graeme K.
Jones, Daryl
Weinberg, Laurence
Bellomo, Rinaldo
author_sort Lloyd-Donald, Patryck
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Thromboelastography (TEG) may provide rapid and clinically important coagulation information in acutely ill patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Our objective was to describe the relationship between TEG and conventional coagulation tests (CCTs), which has not been previously explored in this population. METHODS: In acutely ill patients with severe CLD (Child-Pugh score > 9, category C), we conducted a prospective observational study investigating coagulation assessment as measured by both CCTs and TEG. We used quantile regression to explore 30 associations between TEG parameters and corresponding CCTs. We compared TEG and CCT measures of coagulation initiation, clot formation, clot strength, and fibrinolysis. RESULTS: We studied 34 patients on a total of 109 occasions. We observed inconsistent associations between TEG and CCT measures of coagulation initiation: TEG (citrated kaolin [CK] assay) standard reaction time and international normalized ratio: R (2) = 0.117 (P = .044). Conversely, there were strong and consistent associations between tests of clot formation: TEG (CK) kinetics time and fibrinogen: R (2) = 0.202 (P < .0001) and TEG (CK) α angle and fibrinogen 0.263 (P < .0001). We also observed strong associations between tests of clot strength, specifically TEG MA and conventional fibrinogen levels, across all TEG assays: MA (CK) and fibrinogen: R (2) = 0.485 (P < .0001). There were no associations between TEG and D-dimer levels. CONCLUSIONS: In acutely ill patients with CLD, there are strong and consistent associations between TEG measures of clot formation and clot strength and conventional fibrinogen levels. There are weak and/or inconsistent associations between TEG and all other conventional measures of coagulation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7427018
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74270182020-08-25 Comparison of Thromboelastography and Conventional Coagulation Tests in Patients With Severe Liver Disease Lloyd-Donald, Patryck Vasudevan, Abhinav Angus, Peter Gow, Paul Mårtensson, Johan Glassford, Neil Eastwood, Glenn M. Hart, Graeme K. Jones, Daryl Weinberg, Laurence Bellomo, Rinaldo Clin Appl Thromb Hemost Original Article OBJECTIVE: Thromboelastography (TEG) may provide rapid and clinically important coagulation information in acutely ill patients with chronic liver disease (CLD). Our objective was to describe the relationship between TEG and conventional coagulation tests (CCTs), which has not been previously explored in this population. METHODS: In acutely ill patients with severe CLD (Child-Pugh score > 9, category C), we conducted a prospective observational study investigating coagulation assessment as measured by both CCTs and TEG. We used quantile regression to explore 30 associations between TEG parameters and corresponding CCTs. We compared TEG and CCT measures of coagulation initiation, clot formation, clot strength, and fibrinolysis. RESULTS: We studied 34 patients on a total of 109 occasions. We observed inconsistent associations between TEG and CCT measures of coagulation initiation: TEG (citrated kaolin [CK] assay) standard reaction time and international normalized ratio: R (2) = 0.117 (P = .044). Conversely, there were strong and consistent associations between tests of clot formation: TEG (CK) kinetics time and fibrinogen: R (2) = 0.202 (P < .0001) and TEG (CK) α angle and fibrinogen 0.263 (P < .0001). We also observed strong associations between tests of clot strength, specifically TEG MA and conventional fibrinogen levels, across all TEG assays: MA (CK) and fibrinogen: R (2) = 0.485 (P < .0001). There were no associations between TEG and D-dimer levels. CONCLUSIONS: In acutely ill patients with CLD, there are strong and consistent associations between TEG measures of clot formation and clot strength and conventional fibrinogen levels. There are weak and/or inconsistent associations between TEG and all other conventional measures of coagulation. SAGE Publications 2020-06-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7427018/ /pubmed/32496878 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029620925915 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Lloyd-Donald, Patryck
Vasudevan, Abhinav
Angus, Peter
Gow, Paul
Mårtensson, Johan
Glassford, Neil
Eastwood, Glenn M.
Hart, Graeme K.
Jones, Daryl
Weinberg, Laurence
Bellomo, Rinaldo
Comparison of Thromboelastography and Conventional Coagulation Tests in Patients With Severe Liver Disease
title Comparison of Thromboelastography and Conventional Coagulation Tests in Patients With Severe Liver Disease
title_full Comparison of Thromboelastography and Conventional Coagulation Tests in Patients With Severe Liver Disease
title_fullStr Comparison of Thromboelastography and Conventional Coagulation Tests in Patients With Severe Liver Disease
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Thromboelastography and Conventional Coagulation Tests in Patients With Severe Liver Disease
title_short Comparison of Thromboelastography and Conventional Coagulation Tests in Patients With Severe Liver Disease
title_sort comparison of thromboelastography and conventional coagulation tests in patients with severe liver disease
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427018/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32496878
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1076029620925915
work_keys_str_mv AT lloyddonaldpatryck comparisonofthromboelastographyandconventionalcoagulationtestsinpatientswithsevereliverdisease
AT vasudevanabhinav comparisonofthromboelastographyandconventionalcoagulationtestsinpatientswithsevereliverdisease
AT anguspeter comparisonofthromboelastographyandconventionalcoagulationtestsinpatientswithsevereliverdisease
AT gowpaul comparisonofthromboelastographyandconventionalcoagulationtestsinpatientswithsevereliverdisease
AT martenssonjohan comparisonofthromboelastographyandconventionalcoagulationtestsinpatientswithsevereliverdisease
AT glassfordneil comparisonofthromboelastographyandconventionalcoagulationtestsinpatientswithsevereliverdisease
AT eastwoodglennm comparisonofthromboelastographyandconventionalcoagulationtestsinpatientswithsevereliverdisease
AT hartgraemek comparisonofthromboelastographyandconventionalcoagulationtestsinpatientswithsevereliverdisease
AT jonesdaryl comparisonofthromboelastographyandconventionalcoagulationtestsinpatientswithsevereliverdisease
AT weinberglaurence comparisonofthromboelastographyandconventionalcoagulationtestsinpatientswithsevereliverdisease
AT bellomorinaldo comparisonofthromboelastographyandconventionalcoagulationtestsinpatientswithsevereliverdisease