Cargando…

The effect of bone cement distribution on the outcome of percutaneous Vertebroplasty: a case cohort study

BACKGROUND: To analyze the effect of different types of bone cement distribution after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). METHODS: One hundred thirty seven patients with single level OVCF who underwent PVP were retrospectively analy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tan, Lei, Wen, Bingtao, Guo, Zhaoqing, Chen, Zhongqiang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32791975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03568-9
_version_ 1783570819708878848
author Tan, Lei
Wen, Bingtao
Guo, Zhaoqing
Chen, Zhongqiang
author_facet Tan, Lei
Wen, Bingtao
Guo, Zhaoqing
Chen, Zhongqiang
author_sort Tan, Lei
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To analyze the effect of different types of bone cement distribution after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). METHODS: One hundred thirty seven patients with single level OVCF who underwent PVP were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to bone cement distribution. Group A: bone cement contacted both upper and lower endplates; Group B: bone cement missed at least one endplate. Group B was divided into 3 subgroups. Group B1: bone cement only contacted the upper endplates; Group B2: bone cement only contacted the lower endplates; Group B3: bone cement only located in the middle of vertebral body. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 24 h post operation and last follow-up, anterior vertebral height restoration ratio (AVHRR), anterior vertebral height loss ratio (AVHLR), local kyphotic angle change and vertebral body recompression rate were compared. RESULTS: 24 h post operation, the pain of all groups were significantly improved. The average follow-up time was 15.3 ± 6.3 (6–24) months. At last follow-up, the VAS score of group A was lower than that of group B. There were 14 cases (10.2%) of adjacent vertebral fracture, 5 cases (8.6%) in group A and 9 cases (11.4%) in group B. There were 9 cases (6.6%) of cement leakage, 4 cases (6.9%) in group A and 5 cases (6.3%) in group B. At last follow-up, there were 16 cases (11.7%) of vertebral body recompression, including 3 cases (5.2%) in group A and 13 cases (16.5%) in group B. There was no significant difference in AVHRR between two groups. Local kyphotic angle change was significant larger in group B. At last follow-up, AVHLR in group B was higher than that in group A. Analysis in subgroup B revealed no significant difference in VAS score, local kyphotic angle change, vertebral recompression rate, AVHRR or AVHLR. CONCLUSIONS: If the bone cement fully contacted both the upper and lower endplates, it can better restore the strength of the vertebral body and maintain the height of the vertebral body, reduce the risk of the vertebral body recompression and long-term pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7427078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74270782020-08-16 The effect of bone cement distribution on the outcome of percutaneous Vertebroplasty: a case cohort study Tan, Lei Wen, Bingtao Guo, Zhaoqing Chen, Zhongqiang BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: To analyze the effect of different types of bone cement distribution after percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) in patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF). METHODS: One hundred thirty seven patients with single level OVCF who underwent PVP were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into two groups according to bone cement distribution. Group A: bone cement contacted both upper and lower endplates; Group B: bone cement missed at least one endplate. Group B was divided into 3 subgroups. Group B1: bone cement only contacted the upper endplates; Group B2: bone cement only contacted the lower endplates; Group B3: bone cement only located in the middle of vertebral body. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score at 24 h post operation and last follow-up, anterior vertebral height restoration ratio (AVHRR), anterior vertebral height loss ratio (AVHLR), local kyphotic angle change and vertebral body recompression rate were compared. RESULTS: 24 h post operation, the pain of all groups were significantly improved. The average follow-up time was 15.3 ± 6.3 (6–24) months. At last follow-up, the VAS score of group A was lower than that of group B. There were 14 cases (10.2%) of adjacent vertebral fracture, 5 cases (8.6%) in group A and 9 cases (11.4%) in group B. There were 9 cases (6.6%) of cement leakage, 4 cases (6.9%) in group A and 5 cases (6.3%) in group B. At last follow-up, there were 16 cases (11.7%) of vertebral body recompression, including 3 cases (5.2%) in group A and 13 cases (16.5%) in group B. There was no significant difference in AVHRR between two groups. Local kyphotic angle change was significant larger in group B. At last follow-up, AVHLR in group B was higher than that in group A. Analysis in subgroup B revealed no significant difference in VAS score, local kyphotic angle change, vertebral recompression rate, AVHRR or AVHLR. CONCLUSIONS: If the bone cement fully contacted both the upper and lower endplates, it can better restore the strength of the vertebral body and maintain the height of the vertebral body, reduce the risk of the vertebral body recompression and long-term pain. BioMed Central 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7427078/ /pubmed/32791975 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03568-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tan, Lei
Wen, Bingtao
Guo, Zhaoqing
Chen, Zhongqiang
The effect of bone cement distribution on the outcome of percutaneous Vertebroplasty: a case cohort study
title The effect of bone cement distribution on the outcome of percutaneous Vertebroplasty: a case cohort study
title_full The effect of bone cement distribution on the outcome of percutaneous Vertebroplasty: a case cohort study
title_fullStr The effect of bone cement distribution on the outcome of percutaneous Vertebroplasty: a case cohort study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of bone cement distribution on the outcome of percutaneous Vertebroplasty: a case cohort study
title_short The effect of bone cement distribution on the outcome of percutaneous Vertebroplasty: a case cohort study
title_sort effect of bone cement distribution on the outcome of percutaneous vertebroplasty: a case cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32791975
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03568-9
work_keys_str_mv AT tanlei theeffectofbonecementdistributionontheoutcomeofpercutaneousvertebroplastyacasecohortstudy
AT wenbingtao theeffectofbonecementdistributionontheoutcomeofpercutaneousvertebroplastyacasecohortstudy
AT guozhaoqing theeffectofbonecementdistributionontheoutcomeofpercutaneousvertebroplastyacasecohortstudy
AT chenzhongqiang theeffectofbonecementdistributionontheoutcomeofpercutaneousvertebroplastyacasecohortstudy
AT tanlei effectofbonecementdistributionontheoutcomeofpercutaneousvertebroplastyacasecohortstudy
AT wenbingtao effectofbonecementdistributionontheoutcomeofpercutaneousvertebroplastyacasecohortstudy
AT guozhaoqing effectofbonecementdistributionontheoutcomeofpercutaneousvertebroplastyacasecohortstudy
AT chenzhongqiang effectofbonecementdistributionontheoutcomeofpercutaneousvertebroplastyacasecohortstudy