Cargando…

Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to identify the most important features of structural knee osteoarthritis (OA) progressors and classification using machine learning methods. METHODS: Participants, features and outcomes were from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Features were from baseline (1107), including ar...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jamshidi, Afshin, Leclercq, Mickael, Labbe, Aurelie, Pelletier, Jean-Pierre, Abram, François, Droit, Arnaud, Martel-Pelletier, Johanne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20933468
_version_ 1783570830795472896
author Jamshidi, Afshin
Leclercq, Mickael
Labbe, Aurelie
Pelletier, Jean-Pierre
Abram, François
Droit, Arnaud
Martel-Pelletier, Johanne
author_facet Jamshidi, Afshin
Leclercq, Mickael
Labbe, Aurelie
Pelletier, Jean-Pierre
Abram, François
Droit, Arnaud
Martel-Pelletier, Johanne
author_sort Jamshidi, Afshin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim was to identify the most important features of structural knee osteoarthritis (OA) progressors and classification using machine learning methods. METHODS: Participants, features and outcomes were from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Features were from baseline (1107), including articular knee tissues (135) assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OA progressors were ascertained by four outcomes: cartilage volume loss in medial plateau at 48 and 96 months (Prop_CV_48M, 96M), Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade ⩾ 2 and medial joint space narrowing (JSN) ⩾ 1 at 48 months. Six feature selection models were used to identify the common features in each outcome. Six classification methods were applied to measure the accuracy of the selected features in classifying the subjects into progressors and non-progressors. Classification of the best features was done using an automatic machine learning interface and the area under the curve (AUC). To prioritize the top five features, sparse partial least square (sPLS) method was used. RESULTS: For the classification of the best common features in each outcome, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) achieved the highest AUC in Prop_CV_96M, KL and JSN (0.80, 0.88, 0.95), and Gradient Boosting Machine for Prop_CV_48M (0.70). sPLS showed the baseline top five features to predict knee OA progressors are the joint space width, mean cartilage thickness of the medial tibial plateau and sub-regions and JSN. CONCLUSION: In this comprehensive study using a large number of features (n = 1107) and MRI outcomes in addition to radiological outcomes, we identified the best features and classification methods for knee OA structural progressors. Data revealed baseline X-ray and MRI-based features could predict early OA knee progressors and that MLP is the best classification method.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7427139
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74271392020-08-25 Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods Jamshidi, Afshin Leclercq, Mickael Labbe, Aurelie Pelletier, Jean-Pierre Abram, François Droit, Arnaud Martel-Pelletier, Johanne Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis Original Research OBJECTIVES: The aim was to identify the most important features of structural knee osteoarthritis (OA) progressors and classification using machine learning methods. METHODS: Participants, features and outcomes were from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Features were from baseline (1107), including articular knee tissues (135) assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OA progressors were ascertained by four outcomes: cartilage volume loss in medial plateau at 48 and 96 months (Prop_CV_48M, 96M), Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade ⩾ 2 and medial joint space narrowing (JSN) ⩾ 1 at 48 months. Six feature selection models were used to identify the common features in each outcome. Six classification methods were applied to measure the accuracy of the selected features in classifying the subjects into progressors and non-progressors. Classification of the best features was done using an automatic machine learning interface and the area under the curve (AUC). To prioritize the top five features, sparse partial least square (sPLS) method was used. RESULTS: For the classification of the best common features in each outcome, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) achieved the highest AUC in Prop_CV_96M, KL and JSN (0.80, 0.88, 0.95), and Gradient Boosting Machine for Prop_CV_48M (0.70). sPLS showed the baseline top five features to predict knee OA progressors are the joint space width, mean cartilage thickness of the medial tibial plateau and sub-regions and JSN. CONCLUSION: In this comprehensive study using a large number of features (n = 1107) and MRI outcomes in addition to radiological outcomes, we identified the best features and classification methods for knee OA structural progressors. Data revealed baseline X-ray and MRI-based features could predict early OA knee progressors and that MLP is the best classification method. SAGE Publications 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7427139/ /pubmed/32849918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20933468 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Research
Jamshidi, Afshin
Leclercq, Mickael
Labbe, Aurelie
Pelletier, Jean-Pierre
Abram, François
Droit, Arnaud
Martel-Pelletier, Johanne
Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods
title Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods
title_full Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods
title_fullStr Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods
title_full_unstemmed Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods
title_short Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods
title_sort identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427139/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20933468
work_keys_str_mv AT jamshidiafshin identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods
AT leclercqmickael identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods
AT labbeaurelie identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods
AT pelletierjeanpierre identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods
AT abramfrancois identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods
AT droitarnaud identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods
AT martelpelletierjohanne identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods