Cargando…
Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods
OBJECTIVES: The aim was to identify the most important features of structural knee osteoarthritis (OA) progressors and classification using machine learning methods. METHODS: Participants, features and outcomes were from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Features were from baseline (1107), including ar...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20933468 |
_version_ | 1783570830795472896 |
---|---|
author | Jamshidi, Afshin Leclercq, Mickael Labbe, Aurelie Pelletier, Jean-Pierre Abram, François Droit, Arnaud Martel-Pelletier, Johanne |
author_facet | Jamshidi, Afshin Leclercq, Mickael Labbe, Aurelie Pelletier, Jean-Pierre Abram, François Droit, Arnaud Martel-Pelletier, Johanne |
author_sort | Jamshidi, Afshin |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim was to identify the most important features of structural knee osteoarthritis (OA) progressors and classification using machine learning methods. METHODS: Participants, features and outcomes were from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Features were from baseline (1107), including articular knee tissues (135) assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OA progressors were ascertained by four outcomes: cartilage volume loss in medial plateau at 48 and 96 months (Prop_CV_48M, 96M), Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade ⩾ 2 and medial joint space narrowing (JSN) ⩾ 1 at 48 months. Six feature selection models were used to identify the common features in each outcome. Six classification methods were applied to measure the accuracy of the selected features in classifying the subjects into progressors and non-progressors. Classification of the best features was done using an automatic machine learning interface and the area under the curve (AUC). To prioritize the top five features, sparse partial least square (sPLS) method was used. RESULTS: For the classification of the best common features in each outcome, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) achieved the highest AUC in Prop_CV_96M, KL and JSN (0.80, 0.88, 0.95), and Gradient Boosting Machine for Prop_CV_48M (0.70). sPLS showed the baseline top five features to predict knee OA progressors are the joint space width, mean cartilage thickness of the medial tibial plateau and sub-regions and JSN. CONCLUSION: In this comprehensive study using a large number of features (n = 1107) and MRI outcomes in addition to radiological outcomes, we identified the best features and classification methods for knee OA structural progressors. Data revealed baseline X-ray and MRI-based features could predict early OA knee progressors and that MLP is the best classification method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7427139 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74271392020-08-25 Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods Jamshidi, Afshin Leclercq, Mickael Labbe, Aurelie Pelletier, Jean-Pierre Abram, François Droit, Arnaud Martel-Pelletier, Johanne Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis Original Research OBJECTIVES: The aim was to identify the most important features of structural knee osteoarthritis (OA) progressors and classification using machine learning methods. METHODS: Participants, features and outcomes were from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Features were from baseline (1107), including articular knee tissues (135) assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). OA progressors were ascertained by four outcomes: cartilage volume loss in medial plateau at 48 and 96 months (Prop_CV_48M, 96M), Kellgren–Lawrence (KL) grade ⩾ 2 and medial joint space narrowing (JSN) ⩾ 1 at 48 months. Six feature selection models were used to identify the common features in each outcome. Six classification methods were applied to measure the accuracy of the selected features in classifying the subjects into progressors and non-progressors. Classification of the best features was done using an automatic machine learning interface and the area under the curve (AUC). To prioritize the top five features, sparse partial least square (sPLS) method was used. RESULTS: For the classification of the best common features in each outcome, Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) achieved the highest AUC in Prop_CV_96M, KL and JSN (0.80, 0.88, 0.95), and Gradient Boosting Machine for Prop_CV_48M (0.70). sPLS showed the baseline top five features to predict knee OA progressors are the joint space width, mean cartilage thickness of the medial tibial plateau and sub-regions and JSN. CONCLUSION: In this comprehensive study using a large number of features (n = 1107) and MRI outcomes in addition to radiological outcomes, we identified the best features and classification methods for knee OA structural progressors. Data revealed baseline X-ray and MRI-based features could predict early OA knee progressors and that MLP is the best classification method. SAGE Publications 2020-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC7427139/ /pubmed/32849918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20933468 Text en © The Author(s), 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jamshidi, Afshin Leclercq, Mickael Labbe, Aurelie Pelletier, Jean-Pierre Abram, François Droit, Arnaud Martel-Pelletier, Johanne Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods |
title | Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods |
title_full | Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods |
title_fullStr | Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods |
title_short | Identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods |
title_sort | identification of the most important features of knee osteoarthritis structural progressors using machine learning methods |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427139/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32849918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1759720X20933468 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamshidiafshin identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods AT leclercqmickael identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods AT labbeaurelie identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods AT pelletierjeanpierre identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods AT abramfrancois identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods AT droitarnaud identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods AT martelpelletierjohanne identificationofthemostimportantfeaturesofkneeosteoarthritisstructuralprogressorsusingmachinelearningmethods |