Cargando…

Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection

For 3D radial data reconstruction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fast Fourier transform via gridding (gFFT) is widely used for its fast processing and flexibility. In comparison, conventional 3D filtered back projection (cFBP), while more robust against common radial k-space centering errors,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jinil, Lee, Jeongtaek, Lee, Joonyeol, Lee, Seung-Kyun, Park, Jang-Yeon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70698-4
_version_ 1783570951803240448
author Park, Jinil
Lee, Jeongtaek
Lee, Joonyeol
Lee, Seung-Kyun
Park, Jang-Yeon
author_facet Park, Jinil
Lee, Jeongtaek
Lee, Joonyeol
Lee, Seung-Kyun
Park, Jang-Yeon
author_sort Park, Jinil
collection PubMed
description For 3D radial data reconstruction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fast Fourier transform via gridding (gFFT) is widely used for its fast processing and flexibility. In comparison, conventional 3D filtered back projection (cFBP), while more robust against common radial k-space centering errors, suffers from long computation times and is less frequently used. In this study, we revisit another back-projection reconstruction strategy, namely two-step 2D filtered back-projection (tsFBP), as an alternative 3D radial MRI reconstruction method that combines computational efficiency and certain error tolerance. In order to compare the three methods (gFFT, cFBP, and tsFBP), theoretical analysis was performed to evaluate the number of computational steps involved in each method. Actual reconstruction times were also measured and compared using 3D radial-MRI data of a phantom and a human brain. Additionally, the sensitivity of tsFBP to artifacts caused by radial k-space centering errors was compared with the other methods. Compared to cFBP, tsFBP dramatically improved the reconstruction speed while retaining the benefit of tolerance to the radial k-space errors. Our study therefore suggests that tsFBP can be a promising alternative to the conventional back projection method for 3D radial MRI reconstruction.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7427795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74277952020-08-18 Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection Park, Jinil Lee, Jeongtaek Lee, Joonyeol Lee, Seung-Kyun Park, Jang-Yeon Sci Rep Article For 3D radial data reconstruction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fast Fourier transform via gridding (gFFT) is widely used for its fast processing and flexibility. In comparison, conventional 3D filtered back projection (cFBP), while more robust against common radial k-space centering errors, suffers from long computation times and is less frequently used. In this study, we revisit another back-projection reconstruction strategy, namely two-step 2D filtered back-projection (tsFBP), as an alternative 3D radial MRI reconstruction method that combines computational efficiency and certain error tolerance. In order to compare the three methods (gFFT, cFBP, and tsFBP), theoretical analysis was performed to evaluate the number of computational steps involved in each method. Actual reconstruction times were also measured and compared using 3D radial-MRI data of a phantom and a human brain. Additionally, the sensitivity of tsFBP to artifacts caused by radial k-space centering errors was compared with the other methods. Compared to cFBP, tsFBP dramatically improved the reconstruction speed while retaining the benefit of tolerance to the radial k-space errors. Our study therefore suggests that tsFBP can be a promising alternative to the conventional back projection method for 3D radial MRI reconstruction. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7427795/ /pubmed/32796888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70698-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Park, Jinil
Lee, Jeongtaek
Lee, Joonyeol
Lee, Seung-Kyun
Park, Jang-Yeon
Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection
title Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection
title_full Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection
title_fullStr Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection
title_full_unstemmed Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection
title_short Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection
title_sort strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3d mri with radial data acquisition: 3d fast fourier transform vs two-step 2d filtered back-projection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796888
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70698-4
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjinil strategiesforrapidreconstructionin3dmriwithradialdataacquisition3dfastfouriertransformvstwostep2dfilteredbackprojection
AT leejeongtaek strategiesforrapidreconstructionin3dmriwithradialdataacquisition3dfastfouriertransformvstwostep2dfilteredbackprojection
AT leejoonyeol strategiesforrapidreconstructionin3dmriwithradialdataacquisition3dfastfouriertransformvstwostep2dfilteredbackprojection
AT leeseungkyun strategiesforrapidreconstructionin3dmriwithradialdataacquisition3dfastfouriertransformvstwostep2dfilteredbackprojection
AT parkjangyeon strategiesforrapidreconstructionin3dmriwithradialdataacquisition3dfastfouriertransformvstwostep2dfilteredbackprojection