Cargando…
Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection
For 3D radial data reconstruction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fast Fourier transform via gridding (gFFT) is widely used for its fast processing and flexibility. In comparison, conventional 3D filtered back projection (cFBP), while more robust against common radial k-space centering errors,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70698-4 |
_version_ | 1783570951803240448 |
---|---|
author | Park, Jinil Lee, Jeongtaek Lee, Joonyeol Lee, Seung-Kyun Park, Jang-Yeon |
author_facet | Park, Jinil Lee, Jeongtaek Lee, Joonyeol Lee, Seung-Kyun Park, Jang-Yeon |
author_sort | Park, Jinil |
collection | PubMed |
description | For 3D radial data reconstruction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fast Fourier transform via gridding (gFFT) is widely used for its fast processing and flexibility. In comparison, conventional 3D filtered back projection (cFBP), while more robust against common radial k-space centering errors, suffers from long computation times and is less frequently used. In this study, we revisit another back-projection reconstruction strategy, namely two-step 2D filtered back-projection (tsFBP), as an alternative 3D radial MRI reconstruction method that combines computational efficiency and certain error tolerance. In order to compare the three methods (gFFT, cFBP, and tsFBP), theoretical analysis was performed to evaluate the number of computational steps involved in each method. Actual reconstruction times were also measured and compared using 3D radial-MRI data of a phantom and a human brain. Additionally, the sensitivity of tsFBP to artifacts caused by radial k-space centering errors was compared with the other methods. Compared to cFBP, tsFBP dramatically improved the reconstruction speed while retaining the benefit of tolerance to the radial k-space errors. Our study therefore suggests that tsFBP can be a promising alternative to the conventional back projection method for 3D radial MRI reconstruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7427795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74277952020-08-18 Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection Park, Jinil Lee, Jeongtaek Lee, Joonyeol Lee, Seung-Kyun Park, Jang-Yeon Sci Rep Article For 3D radial data reconstruction in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), fast Fourier transform via gridding (gFFT) is widely used for its fast processing and flexibility. In comparison, conventional 3D filtered back projection (cFBP), while more robust against common radial k-space centering errors, suffers from long computation times and is less frequently used. In this study, we revisit another back-projection reconstruction strategy, namely two-step 2D filtered back-projection (tsFBP), as an alternative 3D radial MRI reconstruction method that combines computational efficiency and certain error tolerance. In order to compare the three methods (gFFT, cFBP, and tsFBP), theoretical analysis was performed to evaluate the number of computational steps involved in each method. Actual reconstruction times were also measured and compared using 3D radial-MRI data of a phantom and a human brain. Additionally, the sensitivity of tsFBP to artifacts caused by radial k-space centering errors was compared with the other methods. Compared to cFBP, tsFBP dramatically improved the reconstruction speed while retaining the benefit of tolerance to the radial k-space errors. Our study therefore suggests that tsFBP can be a promising alternative to the conventional back projection method for 3D radial MRI reconstruction. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7427795/ /pubmed/32796888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70698-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Park, Jinil Lee, Jeongtaek Lee, Joonyeol Lee, Seung-Kyun Park, Jang-Yeon Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection |
title | Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection |
title_full | Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection |
title_fullStr | Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection |
title_full_unstemmed | Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection |
title_short | Strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3D MRI with radial data acquisition: 3D fast Fourier transform vs two-step 2D filtered back-projection |
title_sort | strategies for rapid reconstruction in 3d mri with radial data acquisition: 3d fast fourier transform vs two-step 2d filtered back-projection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32796888 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70698-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkjinil strategiesforrapidreconstructionin3dmriwithradialdataacquisition3dfastfouriertransformvstwostep2dfilteredbackprojection AT leejeongtaek strategiesforrapidreconstructionin3dmriwithradialdataacquisition3dfastfouriertransformvstwostep2dfilteredbackprojection AT leejoonyeol strategiesforrapidreconstructionin3dmriwithradialdataacquisition3dfastfouriertransformvstwostep2dfilteredbackprojection AT leeseungkyun strategiesforrapidreconstructionin3dmriwithradialdataacquisition3dfastfouriertransformvstwostep2dfilteredbackprojection AT parkjangyeon strategiesforrapidreconstructionin3dmriwithradialdataacquisition3dfastfouriertransformvstwostep2dfilteredbackprojection |