Cargando…

How can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? Balance between adherence and adaptations: a study protocol

BACKGROUND: Using evidence-based interventions (EBIs) is a basic premise of contemporary social services (e.g., child and family social services). However, EBIs seldom fit seamlessly into a specific setting but often need to be adapted. Although some adaptions might be necessary, they can cause inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hasson, Henna, Gröndal, Hedvig, Rundgren, Åsa Hedberg, Avby, Gunilla, Uvhagen, Håkan, von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00005-9
_version_ 1783570971885568000
author Hasson, Henna
Gröndal, Hedvig
Rundgren, Åsa Hedberg
Avby, Gunilla
Uvhagen, Håkan
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
author_facet Hasson, Henna
Gröndal, Hedvig
Rundgren, Åsa Hedberg
Avby, Gunilla
Uvhagen, Håkan
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
author_sort Hasson, Henna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Using evidence-based interventions (EBIs) is a basic premise of contemporary social services (e.g., child and family social services). However, EBIs seldom fit seamlessly into a specific setting but often need to be adapted. Although some adaptions might be necessary, they can cause interventions to be less effective or even unsafe. The challenge of balancing adherence and adaptations when using EBIs is often referred to as the adherence and adaptation dilemma. Although the current literature identifies professionals’ management of this dilemma as problematic, it offers little practical guidance for professionals. This research aims to investigate how the adherence and adaptation dilemma is handled in social services and to explore how structured decision support can impact the management of the dilemma. METHODS: The design is a prospective, longitudinal intervention with a focus on the feasibility and usefulness of the structured decision support. The project is a collaboration between academic researchers, embedded researchers at three research and development units, and social service organizations. A multi-method data collection will be employed. Initially, a scoping review will be performed, and the results will be used in the development of a structured decision support. The decision support will be further developed and tested during a series of workshops with social service professionals. Different forms of data—focus group interviews, questionnaires, and documentation—will be used on several occasions to evaluate the impact of the structured decision support. Qualitative and quantitative analysis will be performed and usefulness for practice prioritized throughout the study. DISCUSSION: The study will contribute with knowledge on how the adherence and adaption dilemma is handled and experienced by social service professionals. Most importantly, the study will generate rich empirical data on how a structured decision support impacts professionals’ management of adherence and adaptions. The goal is to produce more strategic and context-sensitive implementation of EBIs in social service, which will increase value for service users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7427905
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-74279052020-09-02 How can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? Balance between adherence and adaptations: a study protocol Hasson, Henna Gröndal, Hedvig Rundgren, Åsa Hedberg Avby, Gunilla Uvhagen, Håkan von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica Implement Sci Commun Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Using evidence-based interventions (EBIs) is a basic premise of contemporary social services (e.g., child and family social services). However, EBIs seldom fit seamlessly into a specific setting but often need to be adapted. Although some adaptions might be necessary, they can cause interventions to be less effective or even unsafe. The challenge of balancing adherence and adaptations when using EBIs is often referred to as the adherence and adaptation dilemma. Although the current literature identifies professionals’ management of this dilemma as problematic, it offers little practical guidance for professionals. This research aims to investigate how the adherence and adaptation dilemma is handled in social services and to explore how structured decision support can impact the management of the dilemma. METHODS: The design is a prospective, longitudinal intervention with a focus on the feasibility and usefulness of the structured decision support. The project is a collaboration between academic researchers, embedded researchers at three research and development units, and social service organizations. A multi-method data collection will be employed. Initially, a scoping review will be performed, and the results will be used in the development of a structured decision support. The decision support will be further developed and tested during a series of workshops with social service professionals. Different forms of data—focus group interviews, questionnaires, and documentation—will be used on several occasions to evaluate the impact of the structured decision support. Qualitative and quantitative analysis will be performed and usefulness for practice prioritized throughout the study. DISCUSSION: The study will contribute with knowledge on how the adherence and adaption dilemma is handled and experienced by social service professionals. Most importantly, the study will generate rich empirical data on how a structured decision support impacts professionals’ management of adherence and adaptions. The goal is to produce more strategic and context-sensitive implementation of EBIs in social service, which will increase value for service users. BioMed Central 2020-02-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7427905/ /pubmed/32885177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00005-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Hasson, Henna
Gröndal, Hedvig
Rundgren, Åsa Hedberg
Avby, Gunilla
Uvhagen, Håkan
von Thiele Schwarz, Ulrica
How can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? Balance between adherence and adaptations: a study protocol
title How can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? Balance between adherence and adaptations: a study protocol
title_full How can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? Balance between adherence and adaptations: a study protocol
title_fullStr How can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? Balance between adherence and adaptations: a study protocol
title_full_unstemmed How can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? Balance between adherence and adaptations: a study protocol
title_short How can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? Balance between adherence and adaptations: a study protocol
title_sort how can evidence-based interventions give the best value for users in social services? balance between adherence and adaptations: a study protocol
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7427905/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32885177
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00005-9
work_keys_str_mv AT hassonhenna howcanevidencebasedinterventionsgivethebestvalueforusersinsocialservicesbalancebetweenadherenceandadaptationsastudyprotocol
AT grondalhedvig howcanevidencebasedinterventionsgivethebestvalueforusersinsocialservicesbalancebetweenadherenceandadaptationsastudyprotocol
AT rundgrenasahedberg howcanevidencebasedinterventionsgivethebestvalueforusersinsocialservicesbalancebetweenadherenceandadaptationsastudyprotocol
AT avbygunilla howcanevidencebasedinterventionsgivethebestvalueforusersinsocialservicesbalancebetweenadherenceandadaptationsastudyprotocol
AT uvhagenhakan howcanevidencebasedinterventionsgivethebestvalueforusersinsocialservicesbalancebetweenadherenceandadaptationsastudyprotocol
AT vonthieleschwarzulrica howcanevidencebasedinterventionsgivethebestvalueforusersinsocialservicesbalancebetweenadherenceandadaptationsastudyprotocol