Cargando…
Dynamics of odor sampling strategies in mice
Mammalian olfactory receptor neurons in the nasal cavity are stimulated by odorants carried by the inhaled air and their activation is therefore tied to and driven by the breathing or sniffing frequency. Sniffing frequency can be deliberately modulated to alter how odorants stimulate olfactory recep...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32797072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237756 |
_version_ | 1783571017123233792 |
---|---|
author | Reisert, Johannes Golden, Glen J. Dibattista, Michele Gelperin, Alan |
author_facet | Reisert, Johannes Golden, Glen J. Dibattista, Michele Gelperin, Alan |
author_sort | Reisert, Johannes |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mammalian olfactory receptor neurons in the nasal cavity are stimulated by odorants carried by the inhaled air and their activation is therefore tied to and driven by the breathing or sniffing frequency. Sniffing frequency can be deliberately modulated to alter how odorants stimulate olfactory receptor neurons, giving the animal control over the frequency of odorant exposure to potentially aid odorant detection and discrimination. We monitored sniffing behaviors and odorant discrimination ability of freely-moving mice while they sampled either decreasing concentrations of target odorants or sampled a fixed target odorant concentration in the presence of a background of increasing odorant concentrations, using a Go-NoGo behavioral paradigm. This allowed us to ask how mice alter their odorant sampling duration and sampling (sniffing) frequency depending on the demands of the task and its difficulty. Mice showed an anticipatory increase in sniffing rate prior to odorant exposure and chose to sample for longer durations when exposed to odorants as compared to the solvent control odorant. Similarly, mice also took more odorant sampling sniffs when exposed to target odorants compared to the solvent control odorant. In general, odorant sampling strategies became more similar the more difficult the task was, e.g. the lower the target odorant concentration or the lower the target odorant contrast relative to the background odorant, suggesting that sniffing patterns are not preset, but are dynamically modulated by the particular task and its difficulty. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7428156 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-74281562020-08-20 Dynamics of odor sampling strategies in mice Reisert, Johannes Golden, Glen J. Dibattista, Michele Gelperin, Alan PLoS One Research Article Mammalian olfactory receptor neurons in the nasal cavity are stimulated by odorants carried by the inhaled air and their activation is therefore tied to and driven by the breathing or sniffing frequency. Sniffing frequency can be deliberately modulated to alter how odorants stimulate olfactory receptor neurons, giving the animal control over the frequency of odorant exposure to potentially aid odorant detection and discrimination. We monitored sniffing behaviors and odorant discrimination ability of freely-moving mice while they sampled either decreasing concentrations of target odorants or sampled a fixed target odorant concentration in the presence of a background of increasing odorant concentrations, using a Go-NoGo behavioral paradigm. This allowed us to ask how mice alter their odorant sampling duration and sampling (sniffing) frequency depending on the demands of the task and its difficulty. Mice showed an anticipatory increase in sniffing rate prior to odorant exposure and chose to sample for longer durations when exposed to odorants as compared to the solvent control odorant. Similarly, mice also took more odorant sampling sniffs when exposed to target odorants compared to the solvent control odorant. In general, odorant sampling strategies became more similar the more difficult the task was, e.g. the lower the target odorant concentration or the lower the target odorant contrast relative to the background odorant, suggesting that sniffing patterns are not preset, but are dynamically modulated by the particular task and its difficulty. Public Library of Science 2020-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7428156/ /pubmed/32797072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237756 Text en © 2020 Reisert et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Reisert, Johannes Golden, Glen J. Dibattista, Michele Gelperin, Alan Dynamics of odor sampling strategies in mice |
title | Dynamics of odor sampling strategies in mice |
title_full | Dynamics of odor sampling strategies in mice |
title_fullStr | Dynamics of odor sampling strategies in mice |
title_full_unstemmed | Dynamics of odor sampling strategies in mice |
title_short | Dynamics of odor sampling strategies in mice |
title_sort | dynamics of odor sampling strategies in mice |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7428156/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32797072 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237756 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reisertjohannes dynamicsofodorsamplingstrategiesinmice AT goldenglenj dynamicsofodorsamplingstrategiesinmice AT dibattistamichele dynamicsofodorsamplingstrategiesinmice AT gelperinalan dynamicsofodorsamplingstrategiesinmice |